Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:22:22.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Algorithm for determining the cantilever load carrying capacity in the 3D manipulation of nanoparticles with geometrical constraints based on FEM simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2014

A. H. Korayem ,
A. K. Hoshiar  and
M. H. Korayem
A. H. Korayem*
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
A. K. Hoshiar
Affiliation:
Faculty of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
M. H. Korayem
Affiliation:
Robotic Research Laboratory, Center of Excellence in Experimental Solid Mechanics and Dynamics, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Nowadays, with the growing use of atomic force microscope (AFM) nanorobots in the fabrication of nanostructures, research in this area has proliferated. A major limiting factor in the utilization of AFM nanorobots is the lack of real-time monitoring. Computer simulations have been widely used to improve the feasibility of nanoparticles pushing by means of the AFM-based nanorobots. In order to prevent damage to a cantilever during the nanoparticle displacement, it is necessary to come up with an algorithm that can check the feasibility of the manipulation operation with regards to the geometrical constraints of the cantilever and the considered path. The existing models for predicting the feasibility of manipulation processes are limited to 2D manipulation models (spherical nanoparticles), which are incapable of predicting the feasibility of 3D operations (lack of a comprehensive model of 3D cases). In this paper, to predict the feasibility of displacing cylindrical nanoparticles and to consider the path of motion (rough surface), a model has been proposed that can ensure the feasibility of the manipulation operation in advance. Finite element simulation has been employed to obtain the maximum load that can be withstood by a cantilever of a specific geometry. Also, the effect of surface roughness on the critical manipulation force has been explored. Ultimately, an algorithm has been presented for determining the feasibility of the manipulation operation by considering the particle motion path and the cantilever geometry.

Keywords

NanomanipulationDynamic load carrying capacityCylindrical nanoparticlesAFM nanorobot
Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 34 , Issue 9 , September 2016 , pp. 2087 - 2104
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kim, S., Shafiei, F., Ratchford, D. and Li, X., “Controlled AFM manipulation of small nanoparticles and assembly of hybrid nanostructures,” Nanotechnology 22, 1–6 (2011).Google Scholar
2. Li, G., Xi, N., Chen, H., Saeed, A. and Yu, M., “Assembly of Nanostructure using AFM Based Nanomanipulation System,” International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Vol. 1 (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2011) pp. 428–433.Google Scholar
3. Korayem, M. H., Zakeri, M. and Taheri, M., “Simulation of two-dimensional nano manipulation of particles based on the HK and LuGre friction models,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 38, 1573–1585 (Springer, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Palacio, M. L. B. and Bhushan, B., “Calibration of Normal and Lateral Forces in Cantilevers Used in Atomic Force Microscopy,” In: Nanotribology and Nanomechanics I, 35, pp. 135–193 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Schaefer, D. M., Reifenberger, R., Patil, A. and Andres, R. P., “Fabrication of two-dimensional arrays of nanometer-size clusters with the atomic force microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1012–1014 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Falvo, M. R., Clary, G., Helser, A., Paulson, S., Taylor, R. M. II, Chi, V., Brooks, F. P., Washburn, S. Jr. and Superfine, R., “Nanomanipulation experiments exploring frictional and mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes,” Microsc. Microanal. 4, 504–512 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Falvo, M. R., Steele, J., Taylor, R. M. II and Superfine, R., “Gearlike rolling motion mediated by commensurate contact: Carbon nanotubes on HOPG,” Phys. Rev. B 62, 10665–10667 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Hsu, J. H. and Chang, S. H., “Tribological interaction between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and silica surface using lateral force microscopy,” Wear 266, 952–959 (2009).Google Scholar
9. Sitti, M. and Hashimoto, H., “Controlled pushing of nanoparticles: Modeling and experiments,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 5, 199–211 (2000).Google Scholar
10. Tafazzoli, A. and Sitti, M., “Dynamic Behavior and Simulation of Nanoparticles Sliding During Nanoprobe-Based Positioning,” International Mechanical Engineering Congress (ASME), Anaheim, California (2004) pp. 965–972.Google Scholar
11. Tafazzoli, A. and Sitti, M., “Dynamic Modes of Nanoparticle Motion During Nanoprobe-Based Manipulation,” IEEE Nanotechnology Conference, Germany (2004) pp. 35–37.Google Scholar
12. Korayem, M. H. and Zakeri, M., “Sensitivity analysis of nanoparticles pushing critical conditions in 2-D controlled nanomanipulation based on AFM,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 41, 714–726 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Korayem, M. H., Zakeri, M. and Aslzaeim, M., “Sensitivity analysis of the manipulation process of driving of nanoparticles on substrates using the AFM with rectangular and V-shaped cantilevers,” Micro Nano Lett. 6, 586–591 (2011).Google Scholar
14. Daeinabi, K., Korayem, M. H. and Yarijani, S. A., “Spring constant analysis of the AFM rectangular, V-shaped and dagger cantilever probes,” Micro Nano Lett. 6, 1007–1011 (2011).Google Scholar
15. Korayem, M. H. and Hoshiar, A. K., “Modeling and simulation of dynamic modes in the manipulation of nanorods,” Micro Nano Lett. 8, 284–286 (2013).Google Scholar
16. Korayem, M. H. and Hoshiar, A. K., “Dynamic 3D modeling and simulation of nanoparticles manipulation using an AFM nanorobot,” Robotica, 32, 625–641 (2014).Google Scholar
17. Korayem, M. H. and Hoshiar, A. K., “3D kinematics of cylindrical nanoparticle manipulation by AFM nanorobot,” Sci. Iranica, accepted, (2014).Google Scholar
18. Onal, C. D., Ozcan, O. and Sitti, M., “Automated 2-D Nanoparticle Manipulation with an Atomic Force Microscope,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), (Japan, Kobe, 2009) pp. 1814–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Onal, C. D., Ozcan, O. and Sitti, M., “Automated 2-D nanoparticle manipulation using atomic force microscopy,” IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 10, 472–481 (2011).Google Scholar
20. Varol, A., Gunev, I. and Basdogan, C., “A Virtual Reality Toolkit for Path Planning and Manipulation at Nano-Scale,” Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, (Arlington, VA, USA, 2006) pp. 485–489.Google Scholar
21. Korayem, M. H. and Esmaeilzadehha, S., “Virtual reality interface for nano-manipulation based on enhanced images,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 63, 1153–1166 (2012).Google Scholar
22. Lianqing, L., Peng, Y., Xiaojun, T., Yuechao, W., Zaili, D. and Xi, N., “Force Analysis of Top-Down Forming CNT Electrical Connection Using Nanomanipulation Robot,” IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, (Luoyang, China, 2006), pp 113–17.Google Scholar
23. Korayem, M. H., Hoshiar, A. K., and Ebrahimi, N., “Maximum allowable load of atomic force microscope (AFM) nanorobot,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 43, 690–700 (2009).Google Scholar
24. Korayem, M. H. and Amanati, A., “Sensitivity analysis of load carrying capacity in AFM-based manipulation,” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 7692–7693 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Li, G., Wang, Y. and Liu, L., “Drift compensation in AFM-based nanomanipulation by strategic local scan,” Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 9, 755–762 (2012).Google Scholar
26. Wang, Z., Liu, L., Wang, Z., Dong, Z., Yuan, S. and Hou, J., “A Stochastic State Prediction in AFM Based Nanomanipulation,” International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, (Chengdu, China, 2012) pp. 1335–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Xu, K., Kalantari, A. and Qian, X., “Efficient AFM-based nanoparticle manipulation via sequential parallel pushing,” Trans. Nanotechnol. 11, 666–675 (2012).Google Scholar
28. Hou, J., Liu, L., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Xi, N., Wang, Y., Wu, C., Dong, Z. and Yuan, S., “AFM-based robotic nano-hand for stable manipulation at nanoscale,” Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 10, 285–295 (2013).Google Scholar