Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:52:42.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Defining a 5′ splice site by functional selection in the presence and absence of U1 snRNA 5′ end

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2002

METTE LUND
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark
JØRGEN KJEMS
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Pre-mRNA splicing in metazoans is mainly specified by sequences at the termini of introns. We have selected functional 5′ splice sites from randomized intron sequences through repetitive rounds of in vitro splicing in HeLa cell nuclear extract. The consensus sequence obtained after one round of selection in normal extract closely resembled the consensus of natural occurring 5′ splice sites, suggesting that the selection pressures in vitro and in vivo are similar. After three rounds of selection under competitive splicing conditions, the base pairing potential to the U1 snRNA increased, yielding a G100%U100%R94%A67%G89%U76%R83% intronic consensus sequence. Surprisingly, a nearly identical consensus sequence was obtained when the selection was performed in nuclear extract containing U1 snRNA with a deleted 5′ end, suggesting that other factors than the U1 snRNA are involved in 5′ splice site recognition. The importance of a consecutive complementarity between the 5′ splice site and the U1 snRNA was analyzed systematically in the natural range for in vitro splicing efficiency and complex formation. Extended complementarity was inhibitory to splicing at a late step in spliceosome assembly when pre-mRNA substrates were incubated in normal extract, but favorable for splicing under competitive splicing conditions or in the presence of truncated U1 snRNA where transition from complex A to complex B occurred more rapidly. This suggests that stable U1 snRNA binding is advantageous for assembly of commitment complexes, but inhibitory for the entry of the U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP, probably due to a delayed release of the U1 snRNP.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 RNA Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)