Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:57:39.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why were Latin America's tariffs so much higher than Asia's before 1950?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2011

Michael A. Clemens  and
Jeffrey G. Williamson
Michael A. Clemens*
Affiliation:
Center for Global Development, 1800 Massachusetts Avenue NW, 3rd floor, Washington, DC 20036, USA. [email protected]
Jeffrey G. Williamson*
Affiliation:
Harvard University and the University of Wisconsin, 350 South Hamilton Street, Unit 1002, Madison, WI 53703, USA. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Latin America had the highest tariffs in the world before 1914; Asia had the lowest. Heavily protected Latin America also boasted some of the most explosive belle époque growth, while open Asia registered some of the least. What brought the two regions to the opposite ends of the tariff policy spectrum? We find that limits to Asian tariff policy autonomy may have lowered tariffs substantially there, but by themselves they cannot explain why Asian tariffs were so much lower than the Latin American tariffs before 1914; that natural barriers, domestic political economy and strategic tariff policy seems to have contributed much to the difference and that the origins of Asian post-World War 2 import-substitution policies seem to lie in the interwar years when Asian tariff levels caught up with those of Latin America.

Resumen

América Latina tuvo los aranceles más altos del mundo antes de 1914; Asia tuvo los más bajos. Fuertemente protegida, América Latina también ofreció uno de los crecimientos más explosivos de la belle époque mientras Asia mostraba uno de los menores. ¿Fue el diferente espectro de la política arancelaria lo que llevó a estas dos regiones a destinos tan opuestos? Nosotros encontramos: que los límites a la autonomía de la política arancelaria en Asia habrían contribuido considerablemente a reducir los aranceles, pero no pueden explicar por sí mismos por qué los aranceles fueron mucho más bajos que en América Latina antes de 1914; las barreras naturales, la economía política nacional y las políticas arancelarias estratégicas parecen haber contribuido mucho a la diferencia en el comportamiento del crecimiento de estas dos zonas y los orígenes de la política de sustitución de importaciones asiática posterior a la II Guerra Mundial parecen extenderse al periodo de entreguerras cuando los niveles arancelarios asiáticos convergieron con los de América Latina.

Keywords

tariffsLatin AmericaAsiagrowthhistoryF13N70O24arancelesAmérica LatinaAsiacrecimientohistoria
Type
Articles/Artículos
Information
Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , 20 March 2012 , pp. 11 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. E. (1998): «Trade Restrictiveness Benchmarks». Economic Journal, 108 (July), pp. 1111-1125.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E.Neary, J. P. (1994): «Measuring the Restrictiveness of Trade Policy». The World Bank Economic Review, 8 (May), pp. 151-169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K.Staiger, R. W. (2002): The Economics of the World Trading System. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bairoch, P. (1989): «European Trade Policy, 1815-1914», in P. Mathias, and S. Pollard (eds), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, vol. VIII. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-160.Google Scholar
Bairoch, P. (1993): Economics and World History: Myths and Paradoxes. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Baier, S. L.Bergstrand, J. H. (2001): «The Growth of World Trade: Tariffs, Transport Costs, and Income Similarity». Journal of International Economics, 53 (1), pp. 1-27.Google Scholar
Bates, R. H.; Coatsworth, J. H.Williamson, J. G. (2007): «Lost Decades: Post-independence Performance in Latin America and Africa». Journal of Economic History, 67 (December), pp. 917-943.Google Scholar
Bernhofen, D. M.Brown, J. C. (2004): «A Direct Test of the Theory of Comparative Advantage: The Case of Japan». Journal of Political Economy, 112 (1), pp. 48-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhofen, D. M.Brown, J. C. (2005): «An Empirical Assessment of the Comparative Advantage Gains from Trade: Evidence from Japan». American Economic Review, 95 (March), pp. 208-224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattman, C., Clemens, M. A., Williamson, J. G. (2002): «Who Protected and Why? Tariffs the World Around 1870-1913». Paper presented to the Conference on the Political Economy of Globalization, Dublin (August 29-31).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattman, C.; Hwang, J.Williamson, J. G. (2007): «The Impact of the Terms of Trade on Economic Development in the Periphery, 1870-1939: Volatility and Secular Change». Journal of Development Economics, 82 (January), pp. 156-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, V. (1994): The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, L. (1993): «Interwar Japanese Agriculture: Revisionist Views on the Impact of the Colonial Rice Policy and Labor-Surplus Hypothesis». Explorations in Economic History, 30 (3), pp. 259-293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centeno, M. A. (1997): «Blood and Debt: War and Taxation in Nineteenth-Century Latin America». American Journal of Sociology, 102 (May), pp. 1565-1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, M. A.Williamson, J. G. (2004): «Why Did the Tariff-Growth Correlation Reverse After 1950?». Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (March), pp. 5-46.Google Scholar
Clingingsmith, D.Williamson, J. G. (2008): «De-Industrialization in 18th and 19th Century India: Mughal Decline, Climate Shocks and British Industrial Ascent». Explorations in Economic History, 45 (July), pp. 209-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatsworth, J. H.Williamson, J. G. (2004a): «The Roots of Latin American Protectionism: Looking Before the Great Depression», in A. Estevadeordal, D. Rodrik, A. Taylor, and A. Velasco (eds), Integrating the Americas: FTAA and Beyond. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp. 37-74.Google Scholar
Coatsworth, J. H.Williamson, J. G. (2004b): «Always Protectionist? Latin American Tariffs from Independence to Great Depression». Journal of Latin American Studies, 36 (part 2, May), pp. 205-232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbo, V. (1992): «Development Strategies and Policies in Latin America: A Historical Perspective». International Center for Economic Growth, Occasional Paper no. 22 (April), pp. 16-48.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A.; Frantz, B.Taylor, A. M. (2003): «The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870-1939». Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (May), pp. 359-407.Google Scholar
Diaz-Alejandro, C. (1984): «Latin America in the 1930s», in R. Thorp (ed.), Latin America in the 1930s. New York: Macmillan, pp. 17-49.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (1987): «Strategic Aspects of Trade Policy», in T. F. Bewley (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory: Fifth World Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobado, R.; Gómez-Galvarriato, A.Williamson, J. G. (2008): «Mexican Exceptionalism: Globalization and De-Industrialization 1750-1877». Journal of Economic History, 68 (September), pp. 758-811.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, (1943): Bread and Democracy in Germany. Berkeley, Cal: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gómez-Galvarriato, A.Williamson, J. G. (2009): «Was It Prices, Productivity or Policy? The Timing and Pace of Industrialization in Latin America 1870-1910». Journal of Latin American Studies, 41 (December), pp. 663-694.Google Scholar
Howe, C. (1996): The Origins of Japanese Trade Supremacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huber, J. R. (1971): «Effect on Prices of Japan's Entry into World Commerce after 1858». Journal of Political Economy, 79 (3), pp. 614-628.Google Scholar
Hurd, J. (1975): «Railways and the Expansion of Markets in India, 1861-1921». Explorations in Economic History, 12 (3), pp. 263-288.Google Scholar
Ingram, J. C. (1971): Economic Change in Thailand 1850-1970. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacks, D.; O'Rourke, K. H.Williamson, J. G. (2011): «Commodity Price Volatility and World Market Integration since 1700». Review of Economics and Statistics, 93 (3), pp. 800-813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, K. H., Cha, M. S. (1996): «Imperial Policy or World Price Shocks? Explaining Interwar Korean Living Standards». Paper presented to the Conference on East and Southeast Asian Economic Change in the Long Run, Honolulu, Hawaii (April).Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. (1951): «Group Behavior and International Trade». Journal of Political Economy, 59 (February), pp. 30-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, S.O'Rourke, K. H. (2011): «The Structure of Protection and Growth in the Late 19th Century». Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (2), pp. 606-616.Google Scholar
Lindert, P. H.Williamson, J. G. (2002): «Does Globalization Make the World More Unequal?», in M. Bordo, A. M. Taylor and J. G. Williamson (eds), Globalization in Historical Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER.Google Scholar
Lockwood, W. W. (1968): The Economic Development of Japan: Growth and Structural Change. Expanded Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mares, D. (2001): Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining In Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, N.Trefler, D. (2010): «The Structure of Tariffs and Long-Term Growth». American Economic Review: Macroeconomics, 2 (4), pp. 158-194.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, K. H. (2000): «Tariffs and Growth in the late 19th Century». Economic Journal, 110 (April), pp. 456-483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K. H.Williamson, J. G. (1999): Globalization and History. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K. H.Williamson, J. G. (2002): «After Columbus: Explaining the European Overseas Trade Boom 1500-1800». Journal of Economic History, 62 (June), pp. 417-456.Google Scholar
Pamuk, Ş.Williamson, J. G. (2011): «Ottoman De-Industrialization 1800-1913: Assessing the Shock, Its Impact and the Response». Economic History Review, 64 (February Special Issue), pp. 159-184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1950): The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Lake Success, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Poelhekke, S.Van der Ploeg, F. (2007): «Volatility, Financial Development and the Natural Resource Curse». CEPR Discussion Paper 6513, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London (October).Google Scholar
Owen, R. (1993): The Middle East in the World Economy 1800-1914. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
Remer, C. F. (1926): The Foreign Trade of China. Shanghai: The Commercial Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1989): Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Effects Domestic Political Arrangements. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D.Warner, A. (1995): «Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, I. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Singer, H. W. (1950): «The Distribution of Gains between Investing and Borrowing Countries». American Economic Review, 40, pp. 473-485.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. (1998): «On the Costs of Inward-Looking Development: Price Distortions, Growth, and Divergence in Latin America». Journal of Economic History, 58 (March), pp. 1-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Ploeg, F. (2011): «Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?». Journal of Economic Literature, 49 (2), pp. 366-420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2002): «Land, Labor and Globalization in the Third World, 1870-1940». Journal of Economic History, 62 (March), pp. 55-85.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2006a): Globalization and the Poor Periphery Before 1950. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2006b): «Explaining World Tariffs 1870-1938: Stolper-Samuelson, Strategic Tariffs and State Revenues», in R. Findlay, R. Henriksson, H. Lindgren and M. Lundahl (eds), Eli Heckscher, 1879-1952: A Celebratory Symposium. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2008): «Globalization and the Great Divergence: Terms of Trade Booms and Volatility in the Poor Periphery 1782-1913». European Review of Economic History, 12 (December), pp. 355-391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2011a): Trade and Poverty: When the Third World Fell Behind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2011b): «Industrial Catching Up in the Third World 1870-1975». NBER Working Paper16809, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. (February).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuba, Y. (1996): «Did Japan Ever Suffer from a Shortage of Natural Resources Before World War II?». Journal of Economic History, 56 (3), pp. 543-560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar