Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:53:09.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

La Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial y la «americanización» de la industria del calzado en España

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2010

José Antonio Miranda Encarnación
José Antonio Miranda Encarnación
Affiliation:
Universidad de Alicantea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the role played by the National Commission for Industrial Productivity (CNPI) in the development of the Spanish footwear industry. First the nature of the Commission is reviewed highlighting its links with the «americanisation» campaign that took place in post-war Europe. Then, it is shown that footwear was one of the priority sectors for the CNPI, and the main initiatives developed by the organism in this industry in the years prior to the take off of exports are expounded. In third place, it is shown that the sector had already undergone a profound «americanisation» in Spain and in Europe in general during the first third of the 20th century. Lastly, the paper attempts to assess the effective repercussion of the CNPI's actions.

Resumen

Este artículo analiza el papel desempeñado por la Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (CNPI) en el desarrollo de la industria española del calzado. En primer lugar se revisa el carácter de la Comisión y se destacan sus vínculos con la campaña de «americanización» que tuvo lugar en la Europa de postguerra. A continuación se muestra que el calzado fue uno de los sectores prioritarios para la CNPI y se exponen las principales iniciativas desarrolladas por el organismo en esta industria en los años previos a su despegue exportador. En tercer lugar, se demuestra que el sector ya había experimentado una profunda «americanización», en España y en el conjunto de Europa, durante el primer tercio del siglo XX. Finalmente se intenta valorar la repercusión efectiva de las actuaciones de la CNPI.

Keywords

americanizaciónfranquismoproductividadindustria del calzadoAméricanisationFranco regimeproductivityfootwear industry

JEL classification

N84: Europe: 1913– N64: Europe: 1913– N44: Europe: 1913–
Type
Artículos
Information
Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , December 2004 , pp. 637 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAFÍA

Anglo-American Council on Productivy (1951): Productivity Team Report on the Footwear Industry. Londres: Anglo-American Council on Productivity.Google Scholar
Anuario Estadístico de España. Madrid (varios años).Google Scholar
Banco de Crédito Industrial (1962): Informe de carácter general sobre la industria del calzado en España, s.l.: Servicio de Estudios del Banco de Crédito Industriai.Google Scholar
Barciela, C. (2000): La ayuda americana a España (1953–1963). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
Barjot, D. (2002): «Introduction», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. París: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 13–50.Google Scholar
Boel, B. (1998): «The European Productivity Agency», en Kipping, M. y Bjarnar, O. (eds.), The Americanisation of European Business. The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models. Londres: Routledge, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Bondi, F. y Mariacher, G. (1979): La calzatura della Riviera del Brenta. Storia & Disegn. Venecia: Cavallino.Google Scholar
Brooker, K. B. (1986): «The transformation of the small master economy in the boot and shoe industry, 1887–1914: with special reference to Northampton». University of Hull. Tesis doctoral.Google Scholar
Buesa, M. (1984): «Las restricciones a la libertad de industria en la política industrial española (1938–1963)». Información Comercial Española 606, pp. 107–121.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (1965): Indexes of Output Per Man-Hour Footwear Industry, 1947–63. Washington: U. S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Calvo, O. (2001): «¡Bienvenido, Mister Marshall! La ayuda económica americana y la economía española en la década de 1950». Revista de Historia Económica XIX, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Carew, A. (1987): Labour under the Marshall Plan. The Politics of Productivity and the Marketing of Management Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1956): Memoria de las visitas realizadas a fábricas francesas de calzado por un grupo de fabricantes mallorquines, con indicación de las principales mejoras observadas para el aumento de su productividad. Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1957): La industria del calzado en Estados Unidos. Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1958): Normalización de medidas del calzado (Estudio piloto en Madrid). Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1959): Productividad de la industria española del calzado. Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1961a): La CNPI y sus actividades en 1960. Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1961b): Industria del curtido: Memoria presentada a la CNPI por el equipo de curtidos enviado a los Estados Unidos. Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1964): Comparación inter-empresas, un estudio piloto en la industria europea del calzado. Madrid: CNPI.Google Scholar
Department of Commerce (1924): Shoes, Leather, and Hides in Great Britain. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Duke, J. y Usher, L. (1989): «Multifactor Productivity Slips in the Nonrubber Footwear Industry». Monthly Labor Review (Abril), pp. 32–38.Google Scholar
Faler, P. G. (1981): Mechanics and Manufacturers in the Early Industrial Revolution. Lynn, Massachusetts, 1780–1860. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Farre-Escofet, E., Marimon, R. y Suris, J. M. (1977): La via menorquina del creixement. Barcelona: Banca Catalana-Servei d'Estudis.Google Scholar
Federation Nationale de L'Industrie de la Chaussure de France (1957): Les industries du cuir. L'industrie de la chaussure. París: Conseil National du Patronat Français et Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques.Google Scholar
Feldenkirchen, W. (2002): «Productivity Missions and the German Electrical Industry», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence After the Second World War. París: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 285–300.Google Scholar
Gabinete de Estudios de la Dirección General de Industrias Textiles y Varias (1966): La industria del calzado en España. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Industria.Google Scholar
Guillén, M. F. (1994): Models of Management. Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hogan, M. (1987): The Marshall Plan: America, Great Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, E. M. (1937): Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Industries du cuir, Les (1920).Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Investigaçao Industrial (1969): Estudos de produtividade, no 9. Medidas directas de produtividade na indústria de calçado mecânico. Lisboa: Secretaria de Estado da Industria-Ministério da Economia.Google Scholar
Kipping, M. (1997): «Consultancies, Institutions and the Diffusion of Taylorism in Britain, Germany and France, 1920s to 1950s». Business History 39 (4), pp. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipping, M. (2000): «A Slow and Difficult Process: the Americanization of the French Steel-Producing and Using Industries after the Second World War», en Zeitlin, J. y Herrigel, G. (eds.), Americanization and Its Limits. Reworking US Technology and Management in Postwar Europe and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–235.Google Scholar
Kipping, M. y Bjarnar, O. (eds.), (1998): The Americanisation of European Business. The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models. Londres: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuisel, R. (1996): Seducing the French. The Dilemma of Americanization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lanthier, P. (2002): «France and US Industrial Know-How: the Case of Electrical Engineering, 1945–60», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 301–314.Google Scholar
Leather Trade's Review, The (1929).Google Scholar
Leroux-Calas, M. (2002): «The Influence of the Productivity Missions on R&D in France: The Case of AFC-Péchiney», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 395–404.Google Scholar
McGlade, J. (1998a): «From Business Reform Programme to Production Drive. The Transformation of US Technical Assistance to Western Europe», en Kipping, M. y Bjarnar, O. (eds.), The Americanisation of European Business. The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models. Londres: Routledge, pp. 18–34.Google Scholar
McGlade, J. (1998b): «The Big Push: the Export of American Business Education to Western Europe After the Second World War», en Engwall, L. y Zamagni, V. (eds.), Management Education in Historical Perspective. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 50–65.Google Scholar
Mioche, P. (2002): «The Mistakes of Productivity Missions to the United States: The Case of the French Steel Industry», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. París: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 265–276.Google Scholar
Miranda, J. A. (1998): La industria del calzado en España (1860–1959). La formación de una industria moderna y los efectos del intervencionismo estatal. Alicante: Generalitat Valenciana e Instituto de Cultura «Juan Gil-Albert».Google Scholar
Miranda, J. A. (2001): «En busca del tiempo perdido: la conquista del mercado exterior y el desarrollo de la industria del calzado en España en la segunda mitad del siglo XX». Revista de Historia Industrial 19–20, pp. 39–77.Google Scholar
Moel, E. (2002): «The American Productivity Gospel in Norway: A Matter of Politics», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence After the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 99–112.Google Scholar
Nadal, J. (1994): «La transición del zapato manual al zapato mecánico en España», en Nadal, J. y Catalan, J. (eds), La cara oculta de la industrialización española. La modernización de los sectores no líderes (siglos XIX y XX). Madrid: Alianza Editorial, pp. 321–339.Google Scholar
Piel. Madrid (varios años).Google Scholar
Piore, M. J. y Sabel, C. F. (1990): La segunda ruptura industrial. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
Productividad. Revista de la CNPI. Madrid (varios años).Google Scholar
Puig, N. (2002): «Educating Spanish Managers. The United States, Modernizing Networks, and Business Schools in Spain, 1950–1975», en Adam, R. P.et al. (eds.), Inside the Business School: The Content of Management Education. Oslo: Abstrakt Press, pp. 71–102.Google Scholar
Revista española de las industrias de la piel. Madrid (varios años).Google Scholar
Revista de la piel. Madrid (varios años).Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F. y Zeitlyn, J. (1997): World of Possibilities. Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröter, H. G. (2002): «What Is Americanisation? Or About the Use and Abuse of the Americanisation-Concept», en Barjot, D., Lescent-Giles, I. y De Ferrière, M. (eds.), L'Américanisation en Europe au XXe siècle: Économie, culture, politique. Volume 1. Lille: Université Charles de Gaulle, pp. 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scranton, P. (1998): Endless Novelty. Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865–1925. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Segreto, L. (2002): «The Impact of the US Productivity Philosophy in Italy After the Second World Wan», en Barjot, D. (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence After the Second World War. París: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
Szenberg, M., Lombardi, J. W. y Lee, E. Y. (1977): Welfare Effects of Trade Restrictions. A Case Study of the U.S. Footwear Industry. Nueva York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. (1989): The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Tiratsoo, N. (2000): «The United States Technical Assistance Programme in Japan, 1955–62». Business History 42 (4), pp. 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiratsoo, N. y Tomlinson, (1993): Industrial Efficiency and State Intervention: Labour 1939–51. Londres: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, J. (1990): «The Failure of the Anglo-American Council on Productivity». Business History 33 (1), pp. 82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U. S. Bureau of Foreing and Domestic Commerce (1946): Boot and Shoe Industry Statistics. Washington: Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Commerce (1929a): Boot and Shoe Industry and Trade in Great Britain. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Commerce (1929b): Boot and Shoe Industry and Trade in Germany. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Commerce (1937): Leather Footwear. World Production and International Trade. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Viñas, A., Viñuela, J., Eguidazu, F., Pulgar, C. F. y Florensa, S. (1979): Política comercial exterior en España (1931–1975). Madrid: Servicio de Estudios del Banco Exterior de España.Google Scholar
Works Progress Administration (1939): Labor Productivity in the Boot and Shoe Industry. Philadelphia: Works Progress Administration, National Research Project in cooperation with Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, J. (2000): «Introduction: Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan», en Zeitlin, J. y Herrigel, G. (eds.), Americanization and Its Limits. Reworking US Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar