Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:31:06.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and educational inequality during the 18th to 20th centuries: Latin America in global comparison*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

Joerg Baten  and
Christina Mumme
Joerg Baten*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Tuebingen and CESifo, Mohlstrasse 36, 72074 Tuebingen. [email protected], [email protected]
Christina Mumme*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Tuebingen and CESifo, Mohlstrasse 36, 72074 Tuebingen. [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the inequality of numeracy and education by studying school years and numeracy of the rich and poor, as well as of tall and short individuals. To estimate numeracy, the age-heaping method is used for the 18th to early 20th centuries. Testing the hypothesis that globalization might have increased the inequality of education, we find evidence that 19th century globalization actually increased inequality in Latin America, but 20th century globalization had positive effects by reducing educational inequality in a broader sample of developing countries. Moreover, we find strong evidence for Kuznets’s inverted U hypothesis, that is, rising educational inequality with GDP per capita in the period until 1913 and the opposite after 1945.

Resumen

En este artículo se estudia la inequidad en la alfabetización matemática – numeracy- y en la educación analizando los años de escolarización y alfabetización matemática de ricos y pobres, ya sean individuos altos o bajos. Para estimar la alfabetización matemática utilizamos el método age heaping para los siglos XVIII y XIX. Contrastando la hipótesis de que la globalización puede haber incrementado la inequidad educacional, encontramos evidencias de que la globalización del siglo XIX aumentó esta inequidad mientras la globalización del siglo XX tuvo, sin embargo, efectos positivos en la reducción de la inequidad educacional en una amplia muestra de países en desarrollo. Además, hemos encontrado evidencias que confirman la hipótesis de la U invertida de Kuznets: una relación positiva entre la inequidad educacional y el PBI per cápita en el período anterior a 1913 y lo opuesto en el período posterior a 1945.

Keywords

human capitalinequalityage heapingnumeracyglobalizationI21N30N36O57capital humanodesigualdadage heapingglobalización
Type
Articles/Artículos
Information
Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History , Volume 28 , Special Issue 2: Special Issue on Latin American Inequality , September 2010 , pp. 279 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Instituto Figuerola de Historia y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

A’Hearn, B.; Crayen, D.Baten, J. (2009): «Quantifying Quantitative Literacy: Age heaping and the History of Human Capital». Journal of Economic History, 68 (3), pp. 783–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzer, M.Baten, J. (2008): «Heights, Inequality, and Trade in the Latin American Periphery, 1950-2004». Economics and Human Biology, 6 (2), pp. 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baten, J. (1999): Ernährung und wirtschaftliche Entwicklung in Bayern, 1730-1880. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Baten, J. (2000b): «Height and Real Wages: An International Comparison». Jahrbuch fuer Wirtschaftsgeschichte, 2000 (1), pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Baten, J.Fraunholz, U. (2004): «Did Partial Globalization Increase Inequality? The Case of the Latin American Periphery, 1950-2000». CESifo Economic Studies, 50 (1), pp. 45–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baten, J.Komlos, J. (2004): «Looking Backward and Looking Forward: Anthropometric Research and the Development of Social Science History». Social Science History, 28 (2), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Baten, J.; Pelger, I.Twrdek, L. (2009): «The Anthropometric History of Brazil, Lima (Peru), and Argentina during the 19th-20th Centuries». Economics and Human Biology, 7 (4), pp. 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillet-Bois, R. R. (1919): Documentos Para la Historia Argentina, vol. 11: Territorio y Poblacion. Padrones de las Ciudades y Campanas de Buenos Aires y Montevideo. Buenos Aires: Compania Sud-Americana de Billetes de Banco.Google Scholar
Castello, A.Domenech, R. (2002): «Human Capital Inequality and Economic Growth: Some New Evidence». Economic Journal, 112, pp. C187–C200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEPAL (2004): Social Panorama of Latin America. Santiago: United Nations Publication.Google Scholar
Clodfelter, M. (2002): Warfare and Armed Conflicts. A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1500-2000. Jefferson, North Carolina and London: McFarland&Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Crayen, D.Baten, J. (2010a): «Global Trends in Numeracy 1820-1949 and its Implications for Long-Run Growth». Explorations in Economic History, 47 (1), pp. 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crayen, D.Baten, J. (2010b): «New Evidence and New Methods to Measure Human Capital Inequality before and during the Industrial Revolution: France and the U.S. in the Seventeenth to Nineteenth Centuries». Economic History Review, 53 (2), pp. 452–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobado, R., Garcia, H. (2009): «Neither So Low Nor So Short! Wages and Heights in Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries Colonial Hispanic America». Working Paper of the Universidad Complutense, Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales Madrid 14-09.Google Scholar
Frankema, E. (2008): «The Historical Evolution of Inequality in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis, 1870-2000». Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit, Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Guntupalli, A.Baten, J. (2006): «The Development and Inequality of Heights in North, West and East India, 1915-44». Explorations in Economic History, 43 (4), pp. 578–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, M., Williamson, J. G. (1999): «Explaining Inequality the World Round: Cohort Size, Kuznets Curves, and Openness». NBER Working Paper no. 7224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1955): «Economic Growth and Income Inequality». American Economic Review, 45 (1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Lambert, D. C. (1968): «La Reparticion Des Los Ingresos y Las Desigualdades Sociales en la America Latina». Revista Mexicana de Sociologia, 30 (3), pp. 571–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H.; Squire, L.Zou, H. (1998): «Explaining International and Intertemporal Variations in Income Inequality». Economic Journal, 108, pp. 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, P., Williamson, J. G. (2001): «Does Globalization Make the World More Unequal?». NBER Working Paper no. 8228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (2001): The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, P.; Rasmussen, F.Gyllenstein, U. (2006): «Height at Age 18 Years Is a Strong Predictor of Attained Education Later in Life: Cohort Study of Over 950,000 Swedish Men». International Journal of Epidemiology, 35, pp. 658–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzel, K.Baten, J. (2009): «Gender Equality and Inequality in Numeracy — the Case of Latin America and the Caribbean, 1880-1949». Revista de Historia Económica — Journal of Latin American and Iberian Economic History, 27 (1), pp. 37–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzel, K., Baten, J. (2010): «Convergence and Divergence of Numeracy: The Development of Age Heaping in Latin America, 17th to 20th Century». Working Paper. University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Moradi, A. (2002): «Height and Health of Women in Sub Saharan Africa and South Asia 1950-80». Conference Proceedings of the International Economic History Association Conference, Buenos Aires (on CDROM).Google Scholar
Moradi, A.Baten, J. (2005): «Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: New Data and New Insights from Anthropometric Estimates». World Development, 33 (8), pp. 1233–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, C., Murtin, F. (2007): «Education Inequalities and the Kuznets Curves: a Global Perspective since 1870». Paris School of Economics Working Paper no. 2007-12.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, K.Williamson, J. G. (1999): Globalization and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxson, C.Schady, N. (2007): «Cognitive Development among Young Children in Ecuador: The Roles of Wealth, Health and Parenting». Journal of Human Resources, 42 (1), pp. 49–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, L. D. (1998): Census Records for Latin America and the Hispanic United States. Baltimore, M.D.: Genealogical Publishing Com.Google Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. (2007): «Inequality and Poverty in Latin America: a Long-Run Exploration», in T. J. Hatton, K. H. O’Rourke and A. M. Taylor (eds), New Comparative Economic History. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. (2008): «Inequality, Poverty and the Kuznets Curve in Spain, 1850-2000». European Review of Economic History, 12, pp. 287–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, F., Rodrik, D. (1999): «Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Sceptic’s Guide to Cross-National Evidence». NBER Working Paper no. 7081.Google Scholar
Sachs, J.Warner, A. (1995): «Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration». Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995 (1), pp. 1–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somoza, J., Lattes, A. (1967): «Muestras de los dos Primeros Censos Nacionales de Población, 1869 y 1895». Documento de Trabajo no. 46, Instituto T. Di Tella, CIS, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Steckel, R.Floud, R. (eds) (1997): Health and Welfare During Industrialization. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Y.; Baten, J., Botelho, T. (2010): «Growth Effects of Brazilian Immigration». Working Paper Tuebingen/Belo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Tanck de Estrada, D. (1999): Pueblos de Indios y Educación en el México Colonial, 1750-1821. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, V.; Wang, Y., Fan, X. (2001): «Measuring Education Inequality: Gini Coefficients of Education, 1960-2000». World Bank Research Paper no. 2525.Google Scholar
Timmer, A.Williamson, J. G. (1998): «Immigration Policy Prior to the 1930s: Labor Markets, Policy Interactions, and Globalization Backlash». Population and Development Review, 24, pp. 739–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutino, J. (2001): «Rural Economy and Society: 1821-1910», in M. S. Werner (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Mexico. Chicago, I.L.: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, pp. 697–705.Google Scholar
United Nations (1995): Economic Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean 1994-1995. Santiago: United Nations.Google Scholar
Van Zanden, J. L. (2009): «The Skill Premium and the Great Divergence». European Review of Economic History, 13, pp. 121–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicario, C. (2010): «Estructura Social y Ocupacional en el Sur Atlántico. Montevideo 1760-1860». Université. de la Republica de Uruguay, Master thesis.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. (2009): «History without Evidence: Latin American Inequality since 1491». Inequality Conference Madrid, May 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. (1994): North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1997): «Openness and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries: The Latin American Challenge to East Asian Conventional Wisdom». World Bank Economic Review, 11, pp. 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. (1998): «Globalisation and the Rise in Labour Market Inequalities». Economic Journal, 108, pp. 1463–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar