Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:55:02.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrative or systematic reviews: can we be more ‘evidence-based’?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

David Barer
David Barer
Affiliation:
University Department of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine), Newcastle General Hospital, Westgate Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 6BE, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 365 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

1Villar, J, Carroli, G, Belizan, JM. Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1995; 345: 772–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2De PedroCuesta, J, WidenHolmqvist, L, BachyRita, P. Evaluation of stroke rehabilitation by randomized controlled studies: a review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1992; 86: 433–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Langhorne, P, Williams, BO, Gilchrist, W, Howie, K. Do stroke units save lives? Lancet 1993; 342: 395–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Dickersin, K, Scherer, R, Lefebvre, C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309: 1286–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Easterbrook, PJ, Berlin, JA, Gopalan, R, Mathews, DW. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Ottenbacher, KJ, Jannel, S. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. Arch Neurol 1993; 50: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Egger, M, Davey, Smith G. Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995; 310: 752–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Woods, KL, Barnett, DB. Magnesium in acute myocardial infarction. BMJ 1995; 310: 1669–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Thompson, SG. Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 1994; 309: 1351–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Barer, D. Assessment in rehabilitation. Rev Clin Gerontol 1993; 3: 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Collen, F, Wade, DT, Bradshaw, GM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 6–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Collen, F, Wade, DT, Robb, GF, Bradshaw, GM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991; 13: 50–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Dennis, M, Langhorne, P. So stroke units save lives: where do we go from here? BMJ 1994; 309: 1273–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Barer, D, Ellul, J. From meta-analysis to epi-analysis. In: Fracchia, GN, Haavisto, KH eds. European medicines research. European Conference Publications, 1995.Google Scholar