Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:32:21.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Different approaches to physiotherapy in stroke

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2008

CJ Partridge  and
W de Weerdt
CJ Partridge*
Affiliation:
The University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
W de Weerdt
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, Belgium
*
CJ Partridge, Centre for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, The University, Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NF, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Rehabilitation
Information
Reviews in Clinical Gerontology , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , May 1995 , pp. 199 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Bobath, B. Adult hemiplegia. London: Heinemann, 1970.Google Scholar
2Brunnström, S. Associated reactions of the upper extremity in adult patients with hemiplegia: an approach to training. Phys Ther 1956; 45: 17–32.Google Scholar
3Rood, MS. Neurologic reactions: a basis for physical therapy. Physiother Rev 1954; 34: 444–49.Google Scholar
4Carr, J, Shepherd, R. A motor relearning programme for stroke. London: Wiliam Heinemann, 1982.Google Scholar
5Affolter, F. Perceptual processes as prerequisites for complex human behaviour. Int Rehabil Med 1981; 3: 3–9.Google ScholarPubMed
6Kuhn, TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. In: Foundations of the unity of science (volumes 1 and 2 of The International Encyclopaedia of unified science). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.Google Scholar
7Kuhn, TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. London: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
8Mulley, GP. Practical management of stroke. London: Groom Helm, 1985.Google Scholar
9Riddock, G, Buzzard, EF. Reflex movements and postural reactions in quadriplegia and hemiplegia with special reference to those of the upper limb. Brain 1921; 44: 397–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Magnus, R. Some results of studies in the physiology of posture. Lancet 1926; ii: 531–36; 585–88.Google Scholar
11Perry, CE. Principles and techniques of the Brunnström approach to the treatment of hemiplegia. Am J Phys Med 1967; 46: 719–815.Google Scholar
12Voss, D. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1967; 46: 838–98.Google ScholarPubMed
13Mott, FW, Sherrington, CS. Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon movement and nutrition of the limb. Proc R Soc 1895; 57: 481–88.Google Scholar
14Kabat, H, Knott, M. Proprioceptive facilitation therapy for paralysis. Physiotherapy 1954; 40: 171–76.Google ScholarPubMed
15Goff, B. Appropriate afferent stimulation. Physiotherapy 1969; 51: 9–17.Google Scholar
16Stockmeyer, SA. An interpretation of the approach of Rood to the treatment of neuromuscular dysfunction. Am J Phys Med 1967; 46: 900–908.Google Scholar
17Bowden, REM. The structure and function of striated muscle. Physiotherapy 1968; 6: 190–95.Google Scholar
18Matthews, PBC. Receptors in muscle. Physiotherapy 1968; 6: 204–208.Google Scholar
19Buller, AJ. Spinal reflex action. Physiotherapy 1986; 6: 208–11.Google Scholar
20Bobath, B. Adult hemiplegia. London: Heineman, 1990.Google Scholar
21Sherrington, CS. Reflex inhibition as a factor in the co-ordination of movements and postures. Q J Exp Physiol 1913; 6: 251–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Magoun, HW, Rhines, H. Inhibitory mechanisms in bulbar reticular formation. J Neurophysiol 1946; 9: 165–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Magoun, HW, Rhines, H. Spasticity, the stretch reflex and the extrapyramidal systems. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1948.Google Scholar
24Gatev, V. The role of inhibition in the development of motor co-ordination in early childhood. Dev Med Child Neural 1972; 14: 336–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Rosner, BS. Brain functions. Annu Rev Psychol 1970; 21: 555–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Goldberger, M. Motor recovery after lesions. Trends Neurosci 1980; 2: 288–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Lawrence, S, Stein, DG. Recovery after brain damage and the concept of localisation of function. In: Finger, S ed. Recovery from brain damage. London: Plenum Press, 1978: 369–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Luria, AR. The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behaviour. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
29Cotton, E, Kinsman, R. Conductive education and adult hemiplegia. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1983.Google Scholar
30Kinsman, R. A conductive education approach to stroke patients at Barnet General Hospital. Physiotherapy 1989; 75: 418–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Holmqvist, LW, Wrethagen, N. Educational programmes for those involved in the total care of the stroke patient. In: Banks, M ed. Stroke. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1986: 526–31.Google Scholar
32Stern, P, McDowell, F, Miller, JM et al. Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 526–31.Google ScholarPubMed
33Mykyta, LJ, Bowling, JH, Nelson, DA, Lloyd, DJ. Caring for relatives of stroke patients. Age Ageing 1976; 5: 87–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Piaget, J. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Ayres, AJ. Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1972.Google Scholar
36Ayres, AJ. Southern California postrotatory nystagmus test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1975.Google Scholar
37Ayres, AJ. Sensory integration and praxis tests. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1984.Google Scholar
38International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.Google Scholar
39Sivenius, J, Pyörälä, K, Heinonen, O et al. The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 1985; 16: 928–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40Smith, D, Goldenberg, E, Ashburn, A et al. Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1981; 282: 517–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41Kalra, L, Dale, P, Crome, P. Improving stroke rehabilitation. A controlled study. Stroke 1993; 24: 1462–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42Garraway, W, Akhtar, A, Hockey, L et al. Management of acute stroke in the elderly: follow-up of a controlled trial. BMJ 1980; 281: 827–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43Langhorne, P, Williams, B, Gilchrist, W, Howie, K. Do stroke units save lives? Lancet 1933; 342: 392–98.Google Scholar
44Loggigian, M, Samuels, M, Falconer, J. Clinical exercise for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 364–67.Google Scholar
45Lord, J, Hall, K. Neuromuscular re-education versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Redhabil 1986; 67: 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46Dickstein, R, Hocherman, S, Pillar, T, Shaham, R. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1233–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Basmajian, JV, Gowland, CA, Finlayson, AJ et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioural-physical therapy versus traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 267–72.Google Scholar
48Wagenaar, RC, Meijer, OG, Wieringen, PCW et al. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neurodevelopmental treatment and the Brunnström method. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990; 22: 1–8.Google ScholarPubMed