Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:45:45.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was Alexander Hamilton a Machiavellian Statesman?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Karl Walling
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many important scholars have seen significant similarities in the political thought of Alexander Hamilton and Niccolo Machiavelli, but the only two references to Machiavelli in Hamilton's papers suggest deep misgivings about the kinds of politics we now call Machiavellian. This essay attempts to clarify Hamilton's ambiguous relation to the sage Florentine by focussing on the problem of waging war effectively and remaining free at the same time in the thought of both statesmen. Although Hamilton understood at least as well as Machiavelli the necessity of dynamic virtù in princes and civic virtue in free citizens, he sought to establish a new order of the ages, a republican empire, which would supply an effectual moral alternative to the genuine Machiavellian regimes of his day.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , Summer 1995 , pp. 419 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1995

References

Nathan Tarcov, Harvey C. Mansfield, Jr., Forrest McDonald, Robert Scigliano, and Michael and Catherine Zuckert supplied much needed advice for revising this essay. The Earhart Foundation supplied generous financial assistance.

1. Stourzh, Gerald, Alexander Hamilton and the Idea of Republican Government (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1970), pp. 132–45Google Scholar; Pocock, J. G. A., The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), pp. 528–33Google Scholar; Kramnick, Isaac, “The ‘Great National Discussion': The Discourse of Politics in 1787,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd ser., 45 (01 1988): 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr., Taming the Prince: The Ambivalence of Modern Executive Power (New York: Free Press, 1989), pp. 247–78.Google Scholar

2. Rufus King to Alexander Hamilton, 14 July 1798, n 2; Relations with France, 1795–1796; and The Stand, No 1,30 March 1798, in The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, ed. Syrett, Harold G. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1961), 19:523–24Google Scholar, 21: 382, and 22:1–2. Hereafter all citations from Hamilton's Papers will be by volume and page number, e.g., Papers, 19: 523–24Google Scholar, etc.

3. Hamilton, to Duane, James, 3 09 1780, Papers, 2: 401Google Scholar, and Burnett, Edmund Cody, The Continental Congress (New York: Macmillan, 1941), p. 487.Google Scholar

4. Duane, , Papers, 2:406.Google Scholar See also Peckham, Howard, The War for Independence (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958), pp. 82–85.Google Scholar

5. See Hamilton, to Laurens, Colonel John, 30 06 and 12 09, 1780, Papers, 2: 348, 428Google Scholar; and Plato's, Republic, trans. Bloom, Allan (New York: Basic Books, 1968), 375a.Google Scholar

6. See, for example, Wood's, GordonCreation of the American Republic (New York: W. W. Norton, 1969), pp. 65–70.Google Scholar

7. See Jefferson's, Thomas Kentucky Resolutions, The Portable Jefferson, ed. Peterson, Merrill D. (New York: Viking Press, 1985), p. 288Google Scholar, and Hamilton's, discussion of jealousy as a vice in Federalist, No. 1, in The Federalist, ed. Cooke, Jacob E. (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1961), p. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Hereafter all citations from The Federalist will be by essay and page number, e.g. Federalist 1:5.Google Scholar

8. Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius, in Machiavelli, the Chief Works and Others, trans. Gilbert, Allan (Durham: Duke University Press, 1989), 3, 29: 492–93.Google Scholar

9. A Full Vindication, December, 1774, Papers, 1: 54Google Scholar; The Farmer Refuted, February 1775, Papers, 1:155–56Google Scholar; Continentalist 3, 9 August 1781, Papers, 2:662–63Google Scholar; Discourses, 2. 2: 330–31Google Scholar; 16: 363; and The Prince, trans. Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 5: 20.Google Scholar

10. Duane, , Papers, 2: 417Google Scholar, and Discourses, 3. 33: 502–03.Google Scholar

11. Duane, , Papers, 2: 406.Google Scholar See also Federalist, 15: 94–98Google Scholar; The Prince, 1: 5–6; 24: 97Google Scholar; and Discourses, 3.11: 458.Google Scholar

12. See Duane, , Papers, 2: 401, 406–407Google Scholar; Hamilton, to De Barbe-marbois, Marquis, 7 02 1781, Papers, 2: 554Google Scholar; Hamilton's, “Unsubmitted Resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention,” July 1783, Papers, 3: 421Google Scholar; Burnett, , Continental Congress, pp. 452–56, 484–85Google Scholar; and Discourses, 1.27:254Google Scholar; 1.34:269; 2.15 360; 3. 24: 485–86.

13. See Federalist, 25: 162–63Google Scholar; Discourses, 1. 34: 267–69Google Scholar; 1. 45: 288–89; and Mansfield, , Taming the Prince, pp. 255–57.Google Scholar

14. Continentalist 3, 9 August 1781, Papers, 2: 663–64Google Scholar; The Prince, 24: 97Google Scholar; and Discourses, 2. 4: 335–39.Google Scholar

15. See Duane, , Papers, 2: 403–04Google Scholar; Hamilton, to Clinton, George, 13 02 1778, Papers, 1:425Google Scholar; and Burnett, , Continental Congress, pp. 317,503,592, 605, 607.Google Scholar

16. Duane, , Papers, 2: 405Google Scholar; Hamilton, to Morris, Robert, 30 04 1781, Papers 2: 604–605.Google Scholar

17. Federalist, 74: 500Google Scholar; The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Nugent, Thomas (New York: Hafner, 1949), 9.1:126Google Scholar; and Discourses, 2. 7: 336–39.Google Scholar

18. See Duane, , Papers, 2: 413Google Scholar; Hamilton's, “Notes Taken at the Federal Convention,” 1–26 06 1787, Papers, 4:163Google Scholar; Hamilton's, “Remarks at the Federal Convention,” 26 06 1787Google Scholar; Papers, 4:218Google Scholar; Hamilton's, “Remarks at the New York Ratifying Convention,” 28 06 1788, Papers, 5: 125Google Scholar; Discourses, 2. 2: 329, 333–34Google Scholar; Tocqueville, Alexis De, Democracy in America, trans. Lawrence, George (New York: Harper, 1966), 1: 237Google Scholar; and Lincoln's speech to the 166th Ohio Regiment, 22 August 1864, in The Political Thought of Abraham Lincoln, ed. Current, Richard N. (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967), 330.Google Scholar

19. Book, Pay, Papers, 1: 390Google Scholar; Duane, , Papers, 2: 404Google Scholar; Hamilton, to Morris, , Papers, 2: 605Google Scholar; The Prince, 25: 99–101Google Scholar; Machiavelli's, Art of War, trans. Farneworth, Ellis (New York: Da Capo, 1965), 7:202–04Google Scholar, martial maxims # 1,6,24; and Clausewitz, Carl Von, On War, ed. Rapoport, Anatol (New York: Penguin, 1985), 3. 6: 259.Google Scholar

20. Burnett, , Continental Congress, pp. 419, 426–27Google Scholar, and Swanson, Donald F., The Origins of Hamilton's Fiscal Policies (Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 1963), pp. 35–37.Google Scholar

21. See Hamilton, to Major General John Sullivan, 7 07 1777, Papers, 1: 284Google Scholar; and Hamilton, to Colonel Clement Biddle, 20 08 1780, Papers, 2: 380.Google Scholar

22. See Discourses, 1.37:272; 2. 2:333; 2.10:349–51Google Scholar; and The Prince, 19:72; 21: 91.Google Scholar See also Hamilton, to Morris, , Papers, 2: 606Google Scholar, his Defense of the Funding System, 07 1795, Papers, 19: 53–54Google Scholar; Federalist, 8: 47Google Scholar; and Flaumenhaft's, HarveyThe Effective Republic, Administration and Constitution in the Thought of Alexander Hamilton (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992), p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23. See, for example, Pocock, , Machiavellian Moment, p. 529.Google Scholar

24. Duane, , Papers, 2: 414Google Scholar, and Morris, , Papers, 2: 604–05, 631.Google Scholar

25. See Necker, Jacques, A Treatise on the Finances of France, trans. Mortimer, Thoma, 3 vols. (London: Logographic Press, 1787), 1: ix–xiii, xxii–xxiii, xcivGoogle Scholar; Swanson, Donald F. and Trout, Andrew P., “Alexander Hamilton, ‘the celebrated Mr. Necker,' and Public Credit,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd. ser., 48 (07 1990): 424–30Google Scholar; and Mcdonald, Forrest, Alexander Hamilton: A Biography (New York: Norton, 1979), pp. 135–36,164–71.Google Scholar

26. See The Prince 18: 70–71Google Scholar; Discourses, 1. 25:252–53Google Scholar; Locke's, Second Treatise ed. Laslett, Peter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 415:215Google Scholar; Hume's, “Of the First Principles of Government,” in Essays Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1985), p. 32Google Scholar; Hamilton's, First Report on Public Credit, 9 01 1790, Papers, 6: 69Google Scholar; and Mcdonald, , Hamilton, p.171.Google Scholar

27. Morris, , Papers, 2:616–20,624Google Scholar; and Discourses 1.25:252Google Scholar; 1.47:292. To trace the relation between the modern economy of increase through trade and credit to the economic foundations of modern military power, see The Prince, 16: 63 and 21: 91Google Scholar; Second Treatise, 42: 298Google Scholar; Hume's, “Of Commerce,” pp. 258–63Google Scholar; Smith's, AdamWealth of Nations, ed. Campbell, R. H. et al. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics, 1979), 1:463–64 and 2:705–09,781–88Google Scholar; Hamilton's, Report on Manufactures, 5 12 1791, Papers, 10: 230, 254–56, 259, 262–63, 291Google Scholar; Hamilton's, Defense of the Funding System, 19: 53–54Google Scholar; and Classic, Edward Meade Earle's, “Adam Smith, Alexander Hamilton, and Friedrich List: the Economic Foundations of Military Power,” in Makers of Modern Strategy, ed. Paret, Peter (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), pp. 217–61.Google Scholar

28. See Clausewitz, , On War, 8. 3: 371–81Google Scholar; Peter Paret's “Clausewitz,” in Makers of Modern Strategy; Earle (see note 27), Weigley, Russel F., Towards an American Army: Military Thought from Washington to Marshall (New York: Columbia University Press, 1962), pp. 10–29Google Scholar; Huntington, Samuel P., The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Practice of Civil Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957), pp. 193–221Google Scholar; and Fiske, John, The Critical Period in American History (Boston: Riverside Press, 1899), pp. 101–103.Google Scholar

29. Hamilton also wanted to rid the army of foreign officers whose presence tended to undermine the morale of American officers, but it was difficult to cashier them without offending American allies. Sometimes, it seems, the only way to follow Machiavelli's famous advice to get rid of mercenaries is to pension them. See Duane, , Papers, 2: 409–410Google Scholar; Hamilton, to Clinton, George, 13 02 1778, Papers, 1:149Google Scholar, Hamilton, to Duer, William, Papers, 1: 247Google Scholar; The Prince, 12: 48–49Google Scholar; and Burnett, , Continental Congress, pp. 312–313,393, 444.Google Scholar

30. Hamilton, to Jay, John, 14 03 1779, Papers, 2:17–19.Google Scholar

31. See Discourses, 1. 6: 209Google Scholar, and Democracy in America, 1: 57 and 2: 705.Google Scholar

32. See Hamilton, to Dickenson, John, 25–30 09 1783, Papers, 3: 454Google Scholar; Federalist, 8: 47Google Scholar; Federalist, 24:156–57.Google Scholar

33. Rudowski, Victor A., The Prince, an Historical Critique (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992), pp. 77–78.Google Scholar

34. Weigley, 25; Hamilton to William Loughton Smith, 10 April 1797, p. 21: 40; Hamilton to Theodore Sedgewick, 2 February, 1799, p.22: 453; and The Art of War, 1:35Google Scholar; VII:212.

35. Federalist, 8: 47Google Scholar; Hamilton's, Remarks on an Act Acknowledging the Independence of Vermont, 28 03 1787, Papers, 4: 140Google Scholar; and Flaumenhaft, , The Effective Republic, p. 19.Google Scholar

36. Discourses, 1,43: 286.Google Scholar

37. See Discourses, 1, 43: 286Google Scholar; Hamilton's, draft of Washington's “Speech to Congress,” 10 11 1796, Papers, 20: 384–85Google Scholar; the Report on a Military Peace Establishment, Papers, 3:391–92Google Scholar; and various proposals for reorganizing the military during the Quasi-War at Papers, 21: 83, 342–43, 362, 486Google Scholar; Papers, 22: 389–90Google Scholar; and Papers, 24: 70,310.Google Scholar

38. Federalist, 8: 45Google Scholar; Discourses, 1. 3: 201–202Google Scholar; 2. 25: 399; and 3.1: 419–421.

39. Federalist, 8: 48.Google Scholar

40. Federalist, 8: 47–48.Google Scholar For an alternate view, which ignores the evidence of this essay and treats Hamilton as the leader of a militarist conspiracy, see Kohn, Richard H., The Eagle and the Sword: The Federalists and the Creation of the Military Establishment in America, 1783–1802 (New York: Free Press, 1975), pp. 252, 272–73, 284–86.Google ScholarElkins, Stanley and Mckitrick, Eric offer a slightly more balanced account in the Age of Federalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 715–19.Google Scholar

41. See Pocock, , Machiavellian Moment, pp. 210, 423, 495Google Scholar; The Prince 21: 91Google Scholar; Discourses, 1. 37: 272Google Scholar; Art of War, 1. 31–32Google Scholar; Locke's, Second Treatise, 42: 297–98Google Scholar; Hume's, “Of Refinement in the Arts,” pp. 277–78Google Scholar; Wealth of Nations, 1:401–02,412Google Scholar; Hamilton at the New York Ratifying Convention, 27 06 1788, Papers, 5: 101Google Scholar; and Hamilton's, Report on Manufactures, 10: 253–54Google Scholar.

42. See Hamilton's, “Design for a Seal for the United States,” 05, 1796, Papers, 20: 208–09.Google Scholar Hamilton spent the last years of his career as an American Churchill warning of a gathering storm in Europe which might soon cross the sea to America. His warnings are not often taken seriously, in part because the French claimed to fight for liberty, and Hamilton's party committed many excesses (which Hamilton sought to prevent) in dealing with suspected Jacobins in America. Moreover, the French invasion did not materialize, at least not during Hamilton's watch. Yet Hamilton's fears were not without foundation. Napoleon did in fact try to send two military expeditions to New Orleans via Haiti in the administration of Thomas Jefferson, who dismantled the forces Hamilton built to confront the best troops of Europe. Fortunately, the courage of rebellious slaves and the persistence of malaria-carrying mosquitoes in Haiti inflicted so many casualties on the French expeditions that Jefferson was able to avoid the necessity of relying on his own arms. See Mcdonald, Forrest, The Presidency of Thomas Jefferson (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1976), pp. 62–64.Google Scholar

43. Federalist, 11: 72–73.Google Scholar See also Epstein, David, The Political Theory of the Federalist (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 11–34.Google Scholar

44. See The Cause of France, 1794, Papers, 17: 585–86Google Scholar; The French Revolution, 1794, Papers, 17:586–88Google Scholar; The War in Europe, 09-12 1796, Papers, 20 339–40.Google Scholar Largely because modern ideological warfare does inspire passions rivalling religious fanaticism, Hamilton did not think it would be possible to combat the French effectively without attaching the passions of religion to constitutional government in America. He proposed forming a Christian Constitutional Society, which might have been a more dynamic alternative to the moribund Federalist Party and have become an American version of the Christian Democratic parties of Europe. Constitutional government would thus have become a kind of Machiavellian civil religion, but for the purposes of combatting the much uglier, atheistic civil religion of republican France. See Hamilton, to Pickering, Timothy, 22 03 1797, Papers, 20: 545Google Scholar; Hamilton, to Bayard, James A., 16–21 04 1802, Papers, 25: 606Google Scholar; and Discourses, 1.15: 234Google Scholar; II: 2, 330–31.

45. The Farmer Refuted, Papers, 1: 86–87Google Scholar; Hamilton, to Gouveneur Morris, 19 05 1777, Papers, 1: 255Google Scholar; Federalist, 1: 3Google Scholar; Federalist, 22:146Google Scholar; Federalist, 85: 594Google Scholar; The Stand, Papers, 21:408Google Scholar; The Prince, 15: 61Google Scholar; 21:88; Discourses, 1 Preface, 190; 2.2:333; and Hume's, “Of the Original Contract” and “An Idea for a Perfect Commonwealth,” pp. 21, 471, 525.Google Scholar

46. See Hamilton's, speech of 18 06 1787, Papers, 4:193Google Scholar, and Jefferson's, notes on Hamilton's republican professions in “Conversation with Thomas Jefferson,” 13 08 1791, Papers, 9:33–34.Google Scholar