Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:21:55.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reasoning Democratically with Who We Are

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

Mark Redhead
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thanks to all the commentators for providing a series of well-reasoned and challenging comments. Many of these concerns are at once a product of stuff left on the cutting room floor, while others have been indirectly addressed in some recent publications. What I want to briefly do is highlight some of the criticisms that I agree with and engage a few salient points of contention.

Type
Roundtable: Mark Redhead's Reasoning with Who We Are: Democratic Theory for a Not So Liberal Era
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , Fall 2015 , pp. 675 - 681
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Redhead, Mark, “Reasoning between Athens and Jerusalem,” Polity 47, no.1 (2015): 84–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “Complementing Rivals: Foucault, Rawls and the Problem of Public Reasoning,” Philosophy and Social Criticism (available online and forthcoming).

2 Jeffrey Stout, Blessed Are the Organized (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010); Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals (New York: Random House, 1971); Luke Bretherton, Christianity and Contemporary Politics (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).

3 Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, 2nd ed. (New York: Crossroads, 1988), 269–71.

4 Alasdair MacIntyre, God, Philosophy, Universities (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009), 179.

5 See Axel Honneth, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996).

6 See Saul D. Alinsky, Reveille for Radicals (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945).

7 See Mark Redhead, Charles Taylor: Thinking and Living Deep Diversity (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2002); Redhead, Mark, “Making the Past Useful for a Pluralistic Present: Taylor, Arendt and a Problem for Historical Reasoning,” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 4 (2002): 803–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Redhead, Mark, “Alternative Secularisms,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 32, no. 5 (2006): 639–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 See Charles Taylor, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), and Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).

9 Charles Taylor, Philosophical Arguments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).

10 See Alinsky, Reveille for Radicals and Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed [1970] (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).