No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Decline can be defined as the disruption of an established order, and if so defined, does not exclude the possibility of the simultaneous rise of new order. The “Decline of the West,” Spengler's term, is substantiated in the history of Western civilization, though not according to Spengler's theory, in the successive disruption of the community of belief, Christendom, through the Protestant revolution of the sixteenth century, of the community of reason, or the Concert of Europe, as it was afterwards named, through the French Revolution at the end of the eighteenth century, and of the community of fear, the balance of power, through the totalitarian revolutions of the twentieth century. A revolution, in every instance, is the overthrow of an established order. Whether the new order, if any, was better than the established order does not matter in deciding whether or not there has been a decline. Whether, for example, during the decline of the West there has been the rise of a scientific and technological community that has spread from the West to the world, giving substance to the slogan ”One World,” does not alter the fact that there has been a gradual disintegration of the established order in the West itself.
1 Osgood, Robert, Limited War (Chicago, 1957)Google Scholar.
2 Voeglin, Eric, “Machiavelli's Prince: Background and Formation,” The Review of Politics, XIII (1951), 142–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 Il Principe, chap. III.
4 Ibid., chap. XI.
5 Loc. cit.
6 Ibid., chap. II.
7 Ibid., chap. XXIV.
8 Ibid., chap. XVIII.
9 Ibid., chap. XI.
10 Ibid., chap. XX.
11 Ibid., chap. XII.
12 Ibid., chap. XIII. Cf. chap. VII.
13 Ibid., chap. III.
14 Ibid., chap. XXI.
15 Ibid., chap. XVII.
16 Richelieu, , Testament Politique, edited by André, Louis (Paris, 1947), p. 99Google Scholar.
17 Ibid., p. 118.
18 Ibid., p. 108.
19 Ibid., p. 145.
20 Ibid., p. 95.
21 Ibid., p. 323.
22 Ibid., pp. 150 ff.
23 Ibid., pp. 202 f.
24 Denzinger-Bannwart, , Enchiridion Symbolorum (Barcelona, 1948), 1322–1326.Google Scholar
25 Richelieu, , op. cit., pp. 325 ff.Google Scholar
26 Ibid., pp. 347 ff.
27 Ibid., pp. 143 ff., 354 ff., 373 ff.
28 Cf. ibid., pp. 372 ff.
29 Bismarck, , Reflections and Reminiscences, tr. by Butler, A. J. (London, 1898), II, 137Google Scholar.
30 Ibid., 134.
31 Ibid., I, 396.
32 Ibid., 401.
33 As quoted by Medlicott, W. N., Bismarck, Gladstone, and the Concert of Europe (London, 1956), p. 30Google Scholar.
34 As quoted by Medlicott, , op. cit., p. 160Google Scholar.
35 Cf. the text of the treaty in Medlicott, , op. cit., pp. 338–341Google Scholar.
36 As quoted by Kohn, Hans, German History: Some New German Views (Boston, 1954), p.30Google Scholar.
37 Bismarck, , op. cit., II, 41 fGoogle Scholar.
38 Tocqueville, De, De la Démocratie en Amérique, ed. by Gain, André (Paris, 1951), I, 623 fGoogle Scholar.
39 Niebuhr, Reinhold, Moral Man and Immoral Society (New York, 1932)Google Scholar.
40 Morgenthau, Hans, “The Decline and Fall of American Foreign Policy,” New Republic, CXXXV (1956), 12 10, 11–16; Dec. 17, 14–18Google Scholar.
41 Kennan, George, American Diplomacy: 1900–1950 (Chicago, 1951), p. 120Google Scholar.
42 Selections from the original memorandum are to be found in Walter Millis, The Forrestal Diaries (New York, 1951), pp. 135–140Google Scholar.
43 Kissinger, Henry, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy (New York, 1957)Google Scholar.
44 Cf. Dulles, in Department of State Bulletin, XXX (1954), 107 fGoogle Scholar.
45 New York Times, Feb. 19, 1953, p. 1.
46 Kennan, George, Russia, the Atom and the West (New York, 1958)Google Scholar.
47 Acheson, Dean, Power and Diplomacy (Cambridge, Mass., 1958), pp. 83 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
48 Morgenthau, Hans, Scientific Man versus Power Politics (Chicago, 1946)Google Scholar.
49 Cf. Fitch, Robert, “The Scientist as Priest and Saviour,” The Christian Century, LXXV (1958), 368–370Google Scholar.