Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:45:44.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Conservatism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Evan Simpson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of ethics has recently become influenced by a form of moral conservatism—a critique of “modernity” with a bias towards Aristotle. It stresses the integrity of communities and their customs, a pluralistic and particularistic respect for the diversity of human groups, the poverty of utopianism and Marxism, and the inevitability of moral and political conflict. Each stress raises major issues: the priority of social goods over human rights; hermeneutical problems of understanding between communities; difficulties for societies' shaping a common future in accordance with their moral understanding; the balance between consensus and conflict in political life. These problems are addressed in an extended form of moral conservatism which defines a number of correspondences with progressive conceptions of humanity. Referring to central facts of moral psychology and possible institutions of public communication, the discussion identifies universal human purposes whose practical implications are consistent with a postmodern society in which the course of development is settled by public deliberation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , Winter 1987 , pp. 29 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Anscombe, G. E. M., “Modern Moral Philosophy,” in Ethics, Religion and Politics, Vol. 3 of her Collected Papers (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981), p. 26.Google Scholar

2 Nagel, Thomas, review of Morality and ConflictGoogle Scholar, by Hampshire, S., New York Times Book Review, 8 04 1984Google Scholar. The term moral conservatism is Nagel's.

3 MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981), p. 30Google Scholar. See also pp. 118–19.

4 Hampshire, Stuart, Morality and Conflict (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983), p. 166.Google Scholar

5 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, pp. 204–205.Google Scholar

6 Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983), pp. 28–29.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. 10. Compare MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 176.Google Scholar

8 Scruton, Roger, The Meaning of Conservatism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980), p. 141.Google Scholar

9 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 75, 86Google Scholar; Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 181.Google Scholar

10 y Gasset, José Ortega, The Revolt of the Masses (New York: W. W. Norton, 1957), p. 96.Google Scholar

11 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. xiv and 192.Google Scholar

12 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 8Google Scholar. Compare MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 119.Google Scholar

13 Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 21.Google Scholar

14 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, pp. 141 and 159.Google Scholar

15 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 152Google Scholar. See also p. 133.

16 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., p. 28.

18 Ibid., pp. 11–12.

19 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, pp. 160 and 100.Google Scholar

20 Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (London: Methuen, 1974), p. 58.Google Scholar

21 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 21.Google Scholar

22 Ibid., p. 152.

23 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, pp. 1, 61, and 67.Google Scholar

24 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 136.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., p. 115

26 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 8 and 314.Google Scholar

27 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, p. 123.Google Scholar

28 Grant, George, English-Speaking Justice (Sackville, New Brunswick: Mount Allison University, 1974), p. 74.Google Scholar

29 Sandel, Michael J., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), p. 133.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., pp. 177–79. Compare MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 206.Google Scholar

31 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. xv.Google Scholar

32 Fried, Charles, Right and Wrong (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978), p. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. xv.Google Scholar

34 On these points see ibid., together with MacIntyre, , After Virtue, p. 62Google Scholar, and Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 91.Google Scholar

35 See Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. xvGoogle Scholar, and Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 136.Google Scholar

36 Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1978), p. 118Google Scholar. Cf. Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 49.Google Scholar

37 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar

38 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 96Google Scholar; Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. 7Google Scholar; Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, pp. 140 and 190.Google Scholar

39 y Gasset, Ortega, The Revolt of the Masses, pp. 115–16.Google Scholar

40 Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, pp. 140–41Google Scholar. Compare Grant, George, Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism (Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 1979), pp. 95–96.Google Scholar

41 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 132.Google Scholar

42 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, pp. 59–79Google Scholar, and Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 149.Google Scholar

43 Cornman, James W. and Lehrer, Keith, Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction (New York: Macmillan, 1969), p. 367.Google Scholar

44 See Putnam, Hilary, Reason, Truth and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 48–56.Google Scholar

45 Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), p. 377.Google Scholar

46 Ibid.

47 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. Linge, D. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976), p. 9.Google Scholar

48 Compare Sandel, , Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, pp. 7–9, 133.Google Scholar

49 On considered attitudes see Hampshire, Stuart, Freedom of the Individual (London: Chatto and Windus, 1965), pp. 85–95.Google Scholar

50 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. xiv and 28Google Scholar. Cf. Woodcock, George, The Crystal Spirit, A Study of George Orwell (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1966), p. 234Google Scholar. I owe this reference to Dr. Louis Greenspan.

51 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, pp. 81 and 140–52.Google Scholar

52 Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, pp. 36, 134.Google Scholar

53 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 118Google Scholar. Compare Woodcock, , The Crystal Spirit, pp. 247, 285.Google Scholar

54 See Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, pp. 15, 281–84Google Scholar, and Scruton, , The Meaning of Conservatism, p. 186Google Scholar. Compare y Gasset, Ortega, The Revolt of the Masses, pp. 117–20, 122–23Google Scholar, and Woodcock, , The Crystal Spirit, p. 235.Google Scholar

55 Walzer, , Spheres of Justice, p. 30.Google Scholar

56 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 116.Google Scholar

57 MacIntyre, , After Virtue, pp. 160, 206.Google Scholar

58 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 152.Google Scholar

59 Burke, , Reflections on the Revolution in France, p. 175.Google Scholar

60 Oakeshott, , Rationalism in Politics, p. 105.Google Scholar

61 Woodcock, , The Crystal Spirit, p. 282.Google Scholar

62 Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (London: Sheed & Ward, 1975), pp. 273 and 337.Google Scholar

63 Freire, Paulo, Pedagogy of the Oppressed (New York: Seabury, 1970), pp. 91, 181–85.Google Scholar

64 Habermas, Jürgen, Legitimation Crisis (Boston: Beacon Press, 1975), pp. 102–110.Google Scholar

65 Grant, , Lament for a Nation, p. 96.Google Scholar

66 Ibid., p. 94.

67 For defense of the points in this paragraph see my article, “Emile's Moral Development: A Rousseauan Perspective on Kohlberg,” Human Development 26 (1983): 198–212.Google Scholar

68 See MacIntyre, , After Virtue, 2nd ed. (1984), p. 276.Google Scholar

69 See Habermas, , Legitimation Crisis, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar

70 Hampshire, , Morality and Conflict, p. 160.Google Scholar

71 See ibid., pp. 33 and 119.