Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Lonergan's cognitional theory, though generally unknown in the discipline, points the way toward a more concrete understanding of politics through its emphasis on the self-appropriation of our knowing. This article examines the invariant structure or method Lonergan finds in all practical or scientific knowing, the precepts that can be derived from the operations of the mind, the continuity between cognitive and moral self-transcendence, and the different horizons which may confine our knowing. It considers the biases which distort personal and political development, the need for cosmopolis, an informal community which helps to save practicality by transcending it, the methodological natural right which may be derived from norms inherent in our knowing, and the emergent probability of progress or decline set by the stock of insights or oversights operative in a society. It concludes that Lonergan's work makes a substantial contribution to the critical human science he seeks and that it could play a helpful role in unifying the discipline.
1. Voegelin, Eric, Anamnesis, trans. Niemeyer, Gerhart (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978), p. 3.Google Scholar
2. Webb, Eugene, Philosophers of Consciousness (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988);Google ScholarGermino, Dante, Beyond Ideology (New York: Harper and Row, 1968);Google ScholarLonergan, Bernard, Insight: A Study of Human Understanding (New York: Harper and Row, 1978), p. 236.Google Scholar [Where possible, I will provide the equivalent citation to the Collected Works of Bernard Lonergan, ed. Crowe, F. E. and Doran, R. M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1988-; 4 vols, to date).Google Scholar Thus Insight, p. 236 = CWL 3: 261].Google Scholar
3. On the general character of Lonergan's effort, see Crowe, F. E., The Lonergan Enterprise (Cambridge: Cowley, 1980).Google Scholar Helpful studies of political implications include Lawrence, Frederick, “Political Theology and ‘The Longer Cycle of Decline,’” in Lonergan Workshop II, ed. Lawrence, F. (Chico: Scholars Press, 1978);Google ScholarDoran, Robert, “Education for Cosmopolis,” Method: Journal of Lonergan Studies 1: 134–57;Google ScholarLamb, Michael, “The Political and Social Dimensions of Lonergan's Theology,” in The Desires of the Heart (New York: Paulist Press, 1988);Google ScholarCrowe, F. E., Bernard Lonergan and the Community of Canadians (Toronto: Lonergan Institute and Canadian Institute of Jesuit Affairs, 1992);Google Scholar and Glendon, Mary Ann, “Comparative Law As Shock Treatment,” Method:JLS 11: 137–53.Google Scholar Unpublished materials and revised editions of published works are being prepared for publication in the Collected Works at the Lonergan Research Institute in Toronto, which generously allows scholars full access to unpublished materials. They maintain a library of printed primary and secondary materials, as well as archives of manu scripts, lecture notes, letters, recordings and other materials.
4. Going, Cathleen, ed., Dialogues in Celebration (Montreal: Thomas More Institute Press, 1980), p. 295.Google Scholar
5. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism and the Integration of the Sciences” (Toronto: Regis College typescript of Dublin transcript of lectures, 1961), p. 14.Google Scholar For Lonergan's related reinterpretation of St. Thomas, , see his Verbum, ed. Burrell, David (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 1967).Google Scholar
6. See: Burrell, David, “Method and Sensibility: Novak's Debt to Lonergan,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 40: 349–67;Google ScholarCrowe, F. E., The Lonergan Enterprise, pp. 60–62;Google Scholar and Lonergan, , A Second Collection, ed. Ryan, F. J. and Tyrell, B. J. (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1974), pp. 213–15.Google Scholar
7. A sample of Lonergan's later writings which nicely illustrates the wide range of his interests is his Third Collection (1985). His educational writings have just been published as Topics in Education and his economic work will be published soon as Essay in Circulation Analysis in the Collected Works.
8. Many applications have been published in Method:Journal of Lonergan Studies and in the volumes of Lonergan Workshop, edited by Frederick Lawrence. A continuing bibliography may be found in the Lonergan Newsletter, edited by F. E. Crowe and R. M. Doran and published by the Lonergan Research Institute.
9. For a summary treatment, see “Cognitional Structure,” in Collection, ed. Crowe, F. E. (New York: Herder and Herder, 1967)Google Scholar = CWL 4;Google ScholarLonergan, , Method in Theology (New York: Seabury Press, 1972), p. 4.Google Scholar
10. Lonergan, , Collection, p. 221Google Scholar = CWL 4: 206.Google Scholar
11. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism,” p. 19.Google Scholar
12. Lonergan, , The Subject (Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1968), p. 15.Google Scholar
13. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism,” p. 20.Google Scholar
14. Lambert, Pierrot et al. , Caring About Meaning:Patterns in the Life of Bernard Lonergan (Montreal: Thomas More Institute, 1982), p. 53.Google Scholar All references to this volume are to Lonergan's answers to questions put to him by a panel; Lonergan, , “Cognitional Structure,” p. 223Google Scholar = CWL 4: 206–207.Google Scholar
15. Going, , Dialogues, pp. 286–87.Google Scholar
16. Lonergan, , Understanding and Being, ed. E. A., and Morelli, M. D. (New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1980), p. 140Google Scholar = CWL 5: 114–15.Google Scholar
17. Insight, chap. 10.
18. Lonergan, , Second Collection, p. 38;Google ScholarLambert, , Caring, pp. 13–15; 46;Google ScholarPolanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge (New York: Harper and Row, 1964);Google ScholarGelwick, Richard, The Way of Discovery (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977), pp. 135–36;Google ScholarLonergan, , “True Judgment and Science,” a 1929 composition, of which a copy is available at the Lonergan Research Institute.Google Scholar
19. Lonergan, , Understanding and Being, p. 148–49Google Scholar = CW 5:121–22.Google Scholar
20. Ibid., p. 149 = CWL 5:122;Google ScholarLonergan, , “Critical Realism,” pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
21. Lonergan, , Collection, p. 227Google Scholar = CWL 4: 210.Google Scholar
22. Lambert, , Caring, pp. 68, 117.Google Scholar
23. Lonergan, , Method in Theology, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
24. Lonergan, , The Subject, p. 9.Google Scholar
25. Insight, p. xGoogle Scholar = CWL 3:3.Google Scholar
26. Ibid., p. 3 = CWL 3:27.Google Scholar
27. O'Connor, Eric, ed., Curiosity At the Center of One's Life (Montreal: Thomas More Institute, 1987), p. 374;Google ScholarInsight, pp. 5–6Google Scholar = CWL 3: 28–31.Google Scholar
28. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism,” p. 2.Google Scholar
29. Lonergan, , Second Collection, p. 269;Google Scholar“Critical Realism,” pp. 2–5;Google ScholarUnderstanding and Being, pp. 26–29Google Scholar = CWL 5: 23–26;Google ScholarMethod in Theology, p. 213 n.63.Google Scholar
30. Polanyi, , The Tacit Dimension (Garden City: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
31. Lonergan, , Collection, p. 228Google Scholar = CWL 4: 211;Google ScholarThe Subject, pp. 11–12.Google Scholar
32. Lonergan, , The Subject, pp. 14–17;Google ScholarLambert, , Caring, p. 52.Google Scholar
33. Lonergan, , The Subject, p. 18. Compare Plato's Republic vii, 514a–518d.Google Scholar
34. Lonergan, , Method in Theology, p. 104.Google Scholar
35. O'Connor, , Curiosity, p. 394.Google Scholar
36. Ibid., p. 395.
37. Insight, pp. 618, 601, 599–600Google Scholar = CWL 3: 641, 624, 622–23.Google Scholar
38. O'Connor, , Curiosity, pp. 371–72.Google Scholar
39. Cushman, Robert, Therapeia:Plato's Conception of Philosophy (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1976);Google ScholarLamb, , “Political and Social Dimensions in Lonergan's Theology,” pp. 270, 277.Google Scholar
40. Going, , Dialogues, p. 310.Google Scholar
41. Crowe, F. E., “An Expansion of Lonergan's Notion of Value” in Lonergan Workshop VII, ed. Lawrence, Fred (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1988).Google Scholar
42. Insight, p. 211Google Scholar = CWL 3:236;Google ScholarLonergan, , “Critical Realism,” pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
43. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism,” pp. 45, 47.Google Scholar
44. Ibid., p. 37.
45. Feynman, Richard, What Do You Care What Other People Think? (New York: Bantam Books, 1989), pp. 116–18.Google Scholar
46. Lonergan, , A Third Collection, ed. Crowe, F. E. (New York: Paulist Press, 1985), p. 177.Google Scholar
47. Lonergan, , Philosophy of God and Theology (London: Darton: Longman and Todd, 1973), p. ix.Google Scholar
48. Going, , Dialogues, p. 288.Google Scholar
49. Lonergan, , Second Collection, p. 29.Google Scholar
50. Ibid., p. 30; Lonergan, , The Subject, pp. 2–7.Google Scholar
51. O'Connor, , Curiosity, p. 382;Google ScholarLambert, , Caring, pp. 230, 245;Google ScholarLonergan, , The Subject, pp. 9–12;Google ScholarGoing, , Dialogues, p. 288.Google Scholar
52. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism,” pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
53. Ibid., pp. 40–43.
54. Lonergan, , Understanding and Being, pp. 110–111Google Scholar = CWL 5: 91.Google Scholar
55. Lonergan, , “Critical Realism,” p. 42.Google Scholar
56. O'Connor, , Curiosity, p. 382.Google Scholar
57. Jacobs, Jane, The Death and Life of Great American Cities (New York: Vintage Books, 1961).Google Scholar
58. Insight, pp. 210–11Google Scholar = CWL 3:235–36.Google Scholar
59. Ibid., p. 229 = CWL 3: 254.Google Scholar
60. Lonergan, , Third Collection, p. 105.Google Scholar
61. O'Connor, , Curiosity, p. 388.Google Scholar
62. Insight, p. 212Google Scholar = CWL 3: 238.Google Scholar
63. de Jouvenal, Bertrand, Sovereignty, trans. Huntington, J. F. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963), pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
64. Insight, p. 209Google Scholar = CWL 3: 234.Google Scholar
65. Ibid., pp. 209–214 = CWL 3:234–39.Google Scholar
66. Ibid., p. 191 = CWL 3: 214;Google ScholarLamb, , “Political and Social Dimensions of Lonergan's Theology,” pp. 270–75.Google Scholar
67. Insight, pp. 220–21Google Scholar = CWL 3: 245–47;Google ScholarLamb, , “Political and Social Dimensions of Lonergan's Theology,” pp. 267–69.Google Scholar
68. Bergson, Henri, The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, R. Ashley and Brereton, Cloudesley (New York: Holt, 1935).Google Scholar
69. Insight, p. 224Google Scholar = CWL 3: 249.Google Scholar
70. Ibid., p. 229 = CWL 3: 254.Google Scholar
71. Ibid., pp. 234, 239 = CWL 3: 259, 264.Google Scholar
72. Ibid., p. 239 = CWL 3: 264.Google Scholar
73. Ibid., pp. 240–241 = CWL 3: 265–67.Google Scholar
74. Lonergan, , Understanding and Being, pp. 328–29Google Scholar = CWL 5: 374–75.Google Scholar
75. Lonergan, , Third Collection, p. 172.Google Scholar
76. Ibid., p. 182; Braio, Frank Paul, “Lonergan's Recovery of the Notion of Natural Right,” Vera Lex 10 (1990): 4–5, 10.Google Scholar
77. Lonergan, , Third Collection, p. 176;Google ScholarInsight, p. 215Google Scholar = CWL 3: 241.Google Scholar
78. Lonergan, , Third Collection, p. 182.Google Scholar
79. Ibid., pp. 172, 174; Lonergan, , “Natural Right and Historical Mindedness” (abstract), in Program: Fifty First Annual Meeting (Washington: American Catholic Historical Society, 1977).Google Scholar
80. Lonergan, , Third Collection, p. 170.Google Scholar
81. Ibid., pp. 176–82.
82. For an interesting argument on the importance of accurate scientific knowledge in moral deliberation, see “Letter of Bernard Lonergan on contraception and the natural law,” ed. Crowe, F. E. and Doran, R. M., The Lonergan Newsletter, 11: 7–8.Google Scholar
83. Voegelin, , Anamnesis, p. 65.Google Scholar
84. Lonergan, , Third Collection, p. 104.Google Scholar
85. O'Connor, , Curiosity, p. 408.Google Scholar
86. Lonergan, , Second Collection, p. 39.Google Scholar
87. Insight, p. 236Google Scholar = CWL 3: 260–261.Google Scholar
88. See Nordquest, David A., “The Federalist on Truth and the Constitution,” Polity 23:527–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar