Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:43:36.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Islam and Modern Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Fauzi M. Najjar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Not since the tenth century has Islam been confronted with a greater challenge of self-examination than in the first half of the twentieth century. During its early expansion Islam came into contact with Greek science and philosophy. Its failure to adapt itself to Greek science and philosophy, and to integrate Greek methods and teachings into its own, determined the character of subsequent Islamic thought and institutions. Between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries, Islamic society lapsed into scientific and cultural stagnation, accompanied by political corruption and social disorganization. The Muslims transmitted Greek science and philosophy to Europe without having been influenced by it to any great degree. Whereas Western Europe accepted the Greek heritage and tried to harmonize it with Christian teachings, the Muslim world remained essentially unaffected. Assuming a negative attitude, it finally rejected Greek thought and learning as heretical and, in self-defense, returned to literalism and orthodoxy. Ever since, Islam has been dominated by the theology of its medieval ulama or doctors of Islamic Law.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , April 1958 , pp. 164 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In the Arab World Iraq, Jordan, and Egypt (until 1952) have adopted a British-type constitutional monarchy, whereas Syria and Lebanon are republics after the French pattern.

2 Orthodox theologians and conservative thinkers accused Mustapha Kemal of undermining Islam by introducing Western democracy into Turkey.

3 SirArnold, T. W., The Caliphate (Oxford, 1924), p. 17.Google Scholar

4 Gardet, Louis, La Cité Musulmane (Paris, 1954), p. 27.Google Scholar

5 Ibid., p. 36.

6 Recurrence and regularity in nature are explained in terms of the “custom of God,” 'ādat Allah.

7 An eminent Pakistani scholar maintains that, as a result of human weakness, man cannot comprehend what is good or bad without being guided by a Prophet; Fyzee, Asaf A. A., Outlines of Muhammadan Law (Oxford, 1949), p. 15.Google Scholar

8 This is also true in a democracy with the essential difference that in a democracy, we obey laws of our own making.

9 Rida, Rashid, al-Khilāfa wal-Imāma al-'Uzmā (The Caliphate or the Supreme Imamate) (Cairo, 1922), p. 27.Google Scholar Cf. Koran, 6, 57.Google Scholar

10 al-Tiktaka, Ibn: al-Fakhri on the systems of government and the Muslim dynasties, trans, by Whiting, C. E. J. (London, 1947), p. 30.Google Scholar

11 SirGibb, H. A. R., “Social Reform Factor X, The Search for an Islamic Democracy,” The Atlantic Monthly, 10, 1956, p. 138.Google Scholar

12 “Although we are apt to think of Islam as a religion,” said Professor D. S. Margoliouth, “it is probable that the Prophet thought of it rather as a nation.”

13 Faruki, Kemal A., Islamic Constitution (Karachi, 1952), p. 57.Google Scholar

14 Jews and Christians were the only religious groups allowed by Islam to maintain their own beliefs and practices if they chose to, on the grounds that they believed in the one God and had the “book.” Others were given the choice of either conversion or the sword.

15 von Grunebaum, Gustav E., Medieval Islam, 2nd ed. (Chicago, 1954), p. 179.Google Scholar

16 Gardet, , op. cit., p. 58.Google Scholar

17 Rida, , op. cit., p. 124.Google Scholar

18 Ibid., p. 123. This is true of most Muslim sects except the Shi'ites who maintain that the Imam receives revelation directly from God and alone has the right to interpret the Koran and the Traditions.

19 It is difficult to reconcile this with the Tradition mentioned on page 168 which implies that obedience is the duty of the Believer no matter what the rulers do. Cf. Rida, , op. cit., p. 41.Google Scholar

20 Levy, Reuben, The Social Structure of Islam (Cambridge [England], 1957), p. 103.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., p. 81.

22 Gardet, , op. cit., p. 64.Google Scholar

23 Levy, , op. cit., p. 78.Google Scholar

24 Koran, 4, 38.Google Scholar

25 However, women did vote in the 1957 national election in Egypt, and two women were elected to Parliament, The New York Times, 07 16, 1957.Google Scholar

26 Gardet, , op. cit., p. 70.Google Scholar

27 Lindsay, A. D., The Modern Democratic State (London, 1955), p. 120.Google Scholar

28 The French understanding of the separation of powers is quite different from, if not completely opposed to, the American practice.

29 Contemporary examples are Saudi Arabia and Yemen.

30 Note the significant demand for a “controlled” and “guided” democracy in Pakistan and Indonesia respectively.

31 In response to recent claims by the orthodox that Turkey should restore the Shari'a as a source of legislation, President Bayar said: “We must never give reaction a chance to return to Turkey.” He was supported by the Opposition leader, Inonu, Ismat. Time, 06 24, 1957.Google Scholar However, the Turkish Government has found it feasible to encourage the revival of Islamic religious sentiment as a check to Communism or as a means for political ends. Cf. Reed, Howard A., “Secularism and Islam in Turkish Politics,” Current History, Vol. 32, No. 190, (06 1957), pp. 333–38.Google Scholar

32 Smith, W. C., Modern Islam in India, A Social Analysis, rev. ed. (London, 1947), pp. 110–111, 133.Google Scholar

33 Ibid., p. 149.

34 Islam and the Principles of Government (Cairo, 1925).Google Scholar

35 From Here We Start, 7th ed. (Cairo, 1954).Google Scholar

36 Rasik, , op. cit., p. 102.Google Scholar

37 Khalid, , op. cit., p. 134.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., p. 142. This does not mean that Islam is equally tolerant of communism or fascism.

39 Muhammad 'Abdu urged the pursuit of modern thought, confident that in the last resort it could not undermine but only confirm the religious truth of Islam.

40 al-Aqqad, Abbas M., Democracy in Islam (Arabic) (Cairo, 1952), pp. 62–63.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., p. 65.

42 Ibid., p. 109.

43 Gardet, , op. cit., p. 120.Google Scholar

44 The Hanbalite school rejected ijma' as invalid after the first generation of the Companions of the Prophet, and Qiyās, analogy, as a legal method. The Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia followed the Hanbalites in rejecting ijma'. Gibb, H. A. R., Mohammedanism (London, 1949), pp. 170–171.Google Scholar

45 al-Razik, Ali Abd, Consensus in the Islamic Shari'a (Cairo 1947), p. 96.Google Scholar

46 Hamayun, Kabir, Science, Democracy, and Islam (London, 1955), p. 20.Google Scholar

47 Ibid., p. 21.

48 Ibid., p. 22.