Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:55:15.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gerhard Ritter's Weltanschauung

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Norman Levine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The existence of core ideas, ideas which are never altered during a person's lifetime, are overlooked by historians who exclusively concentrate on the relativity of thought. Ideas of this unchanging nature are called atomic concepts. A study of Gerhard Ritter's major themes demonstrates that ideas can be either relative or atomic. Although they received different illuminations in different historical environments, Ritter possessed a group of atomic concepts. They were the material for a basic Weltanschauung, which survived seventy-nine years of history in fluid, but unmistakable form.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 209 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ritter, Gerhard, “Machiavelli und der Ursprung des modernen Nationalismus,” Vom sittlichen Problem der Macht (Bern, 1961), pp. 5–26.Google ScholarThis point is also discussed in the essay, Die Legende vom der verschmahten englischen Freundschaft (Freiburg, 1929).Google Scholar

2 Letter from Gerhard Ritter to Andreas Dorpalen, 03 3, 1962.Google Scholar

3 Oncken, Hermann, “Die Utopia des Thomas More und das Machtproblem in der Staatslehre,” Nation und Geschichte (Berlin, 1935), pp. 373–397.Google Scholar

4 Morus, Thomas: Utopia, Band 1 of Klassiker der Politik, ed. Oncken, H. (Berlin, 1922).Google Scholar

5 Die Heidelberger Universitãt (Heidelberg, 1934), p. 4.Google Scholar

6 Interview with Gerhard Ritter, 09 11, 1964.Google Scholar

7 Letter from Gerhard Ritter, 10 16, 1965.Google Scholar

8 “Die Geistigen Ursachen der Reformation,” Die Zeitwende, Band VII, Heft 7 (06, 1931), 1–13.Google ScholarSee also Studien zur Spãtscholastik (Heidelberg, 1931), Band 2.Google Scholar

9 “Die Reformation und das politische Schicksal Deutschlands,” Die Zeitwende, Band IV, Heft 1 (01, 1928), 1–21.Google ScholarThis theme is more fully developed in Die Neugestaltung Europas im 16. Jahrhundert (Berlin, 1950).Google Scholar

10 Ernst Troeltsch, The Social Teaching of the Christian Churches, trans. Olive Wyon (London, 1931), II, 511.Google Scholar

11 Oncken, , “Der Sinn der deutschen Geschichte,” Nation und Geschichte, pp. 15–44.Google Scholar

12 Interview with Gerhard Ritter, 09 11, 1964.Google Scholar

13 Holborn, Hajo, “Karl Höll,” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte, Band V, Heft 5 (06, 1927), 422.Google Scholar

14 Das deutsche Probleme (München, 1962).Google ScholarA more concentrated analysis of this idea is found in “The Historical Foundations of the Rise of National Socialism,” The Third Reich, ed. International Council for Philosophy and Humanistic Studies (London, 1955), pp. 310–416.Google Scholar

15 “Ewiges Recht und Staatsinteress,” Die Tatwelt, Band IX, Heft 1 (08, 1933), 11–19.Google ScholarFurther evidence is found in Die Staatsanschauung des Freiherrn vom Stein (Berlin, 1927).Google Scholar

16 Letter from Gerhard Ritter, 10 16, 1965.Google Scholar

17 Luther, : Gestalt und Symbol (München, 1925), p. 179.Google Scholar

19 Interview with Gerhard Ritter, 09 11, 1964.Google Scholar

20 Ibid.

21 Luther, : Gestalt und Symbol, p. 83.Google Scholar

22 Luther, : His Life and Work, trans. John Riches (New York, 1964), p. 218.Google Scholar

23 Letter from Gerhard Ritter, 12 11, 1965.Google Scholar

24 Bismarcks Verhältnis zu England und die Politik des “Neuen Kurses” (Berlin, 1924), p. 71.Google Scholar

25 Bismarcks Reichsgrundung und die Aufgaben deutscher Zukunft (Freiburg, 1928), p. 7.Google Scholar

26 Interview with Gerhard Ritter, 09 12, 1964.Google Scholar

27 Interview with Gerhard Ritter, 10 16, 1964.Google Scholar

28 Letter from Gerhard Ritter, 12 11, 1965.Google Scholar

29 Interview with Willy Andreas, 09 12, 1964.Google Scholar

30 Interview with Werner Conze, 10 6, 1964.Google Scholar

31 Die Preussischen Konservativen und Bismarcks deutsche Politik (Heidelberg, 1913), p. 98.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., p. 292.

33 “Die Entstehung der Indemnitätsvorlage von 1866,” Historische Zeitschrift, Band CXIV, Heft 3 (04, 1915), 43.Google Scholar

34 Die Preussischen Konservativen und Bismarcks deutsche Politik, p. 68.Google Scholar

35 Luther, : His Life and Work, p. 25.Google Scholar

36 Stein (3rd ed. Stuttgart, 1958), p. 19.Google Scholar

37 Friedrich der Grosse (Leipzig, 1936), p. 75.Google Scholar

38 Ibid., p. 76.

39 “Das Bismarckproblem,” Merkur, Band IV, Heft 6 (06, 1950), 657–676.Google ScholarAlso see “Grossdeutsch und Kleindeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert,” Schicksalswege deutsche Vergangenheit, ed. by Hubatsch, W. (Düsseldorf, 1950), pp. 177–201.Google Scholar

40 Luther, : His Life and Work, p. 135.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., p. 140.

42 Ibid., p. 122.

43 Friedrich der Grosse, p. 75.Google Scholar

44 Ibid., p. 77.

45 Luther, : His Life and Work, p. 30.Google Scholar

46 “Politische Ethik,” Vom sittlichen Problem der Macht (Bern, 1961), pp. 5–26.Google ScholarAdded clarification of this idea in “Dämonie der Macht und Weisheit der Antike,” Die Welt als Geschichte, Band V, Heft 6 (06, 1950), 81–85.Google Scholar

47 “Altersbriefs Ludwig von Gerlach,” Deutsche Review, Band XXXVI, Heft 1 (01, 1911), 43–59, 215–229, 358–70.Google ScholarAlso see Part Two in Deutsche Review, Band XXXVI, Heft 2 (02, 1911), 104–118, 207–215, 304–317.Google Scholar

48 Letter from Gerhard Ritter, 01 21, 1965.Google Scholar

49 Ibid.

50 Interview with Werner Conze, 10 6, 1964.Google Scholar

51 The German Resistance, trans. Clark, R. T. (New York, 1958).Google Scholar

52 “Die Ausprägung deutscher und westeuropäischer Geistesart ira konfessionellen Zeitalter,” Historische Zeitschrift, Band CXLIX, Heft 2 (10, 1934), 240–252.Google ScholarAlso, “Luther und die Politische Erziehung der Deutschen,” Die Zeitwende, Band XVIII, Heft 6 (09, 1947), 47–65.Google Scholar

53 Geschichte als Bildungsmacht (Stuttgart, 1947).Google Scholar

54 Vom Sinn des Todesopfers (München, 1947).Google Scholar

55 Interview with Gerhard Ritter, 09 11, 1964.Google Scholar

56 “Die deutschen Historikertage,” Geschichte in Wissenschaft und Unterricht, Band IV, Heft 9 (02, 1953), 513–521.Google Scholar“Scientific History, Contemporary History and Science,” History and Theory, I, (05, 1961), 240–268.Google Scholar“Zur Neugestaltung unserer Zeitschrift,” Archiv filr Reformationsgeschichte, Band XXXV, Heft 2 (05, 1938), 1–8.Google Scholar

57 Interview with Karl Löwith, 11 28, 1964.Google Scholar

58 “Christentum und Geschichte,” Die Zeitwende, Band XII, Heft 2 (10. 1952), 145–148.Google ScholarChristentum und Selbstbehauptung (Stuttgart, 1946).Google Scholar

59 Luther, : His Life and Work, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar

60 “Die Menschenrechte und das Christentum,” Vom sittlichen Problem der Macht (Bern, 1961), pp. 84–96.Google Scholar

61 Ibid.

62 Kohn, Hans, “Rethinking Recent German History,” German History: Some New German Views, ed.Kohn, Hans (Boston, 1954), pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

63 Rantzau, Johann von, “The Glorification of the State in German Historical Writing,” German History: Some New German Views, pp. 157–174.Google Scholar

64 Ibid.

65 Die Idee der Universitat und das Öffentliche Leben (Freiburg, 1946).Google Scholar

66 “Vom Ursprung der Einparteienstaats in Europa,” Lebendige Vergangenheit (München, 1958), pp. 37–41.Google Scholar

67 “Die Fälschung der deutschen Geschichtsbildes im Hitlerreich,” Deutsche Rundschau, Band LXX, Heft 4 (04, 1947), 152–159.Google Scholar

68 Das Problem der Militarismus in Deutschland (Bonn, 1955), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

69 The Schlieffen Plan, trans. Liddell Hart, B. H. (London, 1958).Google Scholar