No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
France in Algeria—A Problem of Culture Contact*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Extract
If We are to discuss race and culture contacts in North Africa, we must first appraise the historico-geographical conditions under which such contacts have taken place. It seems significant then that the Arab geographers called what is now Italian, French, and Spanish North Africa, Djesiret el Maghreb, that is the Island of the West. On a closer look, North Africa is indeed an island, separated, as it is, from the European North by the Mediterranean Sea, from Egypt and the Near East by the Libyan desert, and from the Negro country of the Sudan by the desert belt of the Sahara. To the West, it borders on the open Ocean. Within this so-bounded island, however, there is no unity. There are wild mountain ranges and fertile valleys, wind-swept plateaus, and the dry steppe regions which fade out into the immensity of the desert; but a core of integration, a central landscape, as it were, is lacking. As a result of these geographical conditions, there has been sufficient isolation for ancient customs and particular creeds to be preserved, but there has been not enough concentrated political power to enable the peoples of North Africa to fend off frequent invasion and the ever recurring play of outside intervention.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1945
References
1 Gautier, Émile-Félix, L'Afrique Blanche, (Paris, 1939), especially pp. 7–18, 167–206Google Scholar; Gautier, Émile-Félix, Le Sahara, (Paris, 1923)Google Scholar, Engl. transl. by Mayhew, Dorothy Ford: Sahara—The Creal Desert, (New York, 1935), especially pp., 121–139Google Scholar; Cf. Gautier, Émile-Félix, Le Passé de l'Afrique du Nord, (Paris, 1937)Google Scholar and Abderrahman Ben Abdallah Ben Imran Ben Amir Es-Saadi (French transl. from the Arabic by Houdas, O.), Tarty Es-Soudan, (Paris, 1900)Google Scholar.
2 Le Domaim Colonial Français, Tome Deuxième: L'Afrique du Nord, (Paris, 1929), pp. 55–58Google Scholar; Stanford, Charles Thomas, About Algeria, (London, 1912). p. 42Google Scholar.
3 Cahnman, Werner J., “Religion and Nationality,” The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. XLIX, No. 6, (05 1944), pp. 524–29, and the literature mentioned there. The present paper should be understood as an application of the principles evolved in this previous publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Cf. Bernard, Augustin, quoted ace. to Le Domaine Colonial Français, op. cit., p. 61Google Scholar, and Maunier, René, Loi Française et Coutume Indigène, (Paris, 1932), passim, esp. pp. 108, 110, 112, 123, and 129Google Scholar: “Le probleme est avant tout celui de la mise en contact de la ‘nation,’ ou de l'État, et même de l'Empire, que nous représentons, avec la ‘tribu,’ ou bien avec la ‘cité.’ Il y a, en Afrique du Nord, des groupes de populations qui en sont demeurés à la tribu; il y a, d'autre part, des groupes de populations qui en sont arrivés à la cité: mais il en a pas qui soient parvenus a l'État.”
4 Schacht, Joseph, “Islamic Law,” Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, IV, pp. 344–49Google Scholar; see also the brief summary in Liebesny, Herbert, The Government of French North Africa, African Handbooks: 1, (Philadelphia, 1943), pp. 116–121 and the literature mentioned thereCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Cf. Werner J. Cahnman, op. cit., with regard to the “millet” institution.
6 Répertoire Statistique des Communes de l'Algérie. République Française, Service Genetral de Statistique du gouvernement Général de l'Algérie, (Algiers, 1932), pp. 252–53Google Scholar; Recensements Quinquennaux de la Population Algérienne de 1926 et de 1931. (Algiers, 1932), p. 129; and othersGoogle Scholar.
7 Piquet, Victor, L'Algérie Francaise—Un Siècle de Colonisation—1830–1930. (Paris. 1930), pp. 215 ff, 277 ffGoogle Scholar; Cf. Le Domaine Colonial Française, op. cit., p. 72 and Kehl, Camille, “L'Indigène Musulman de I'Algérie,” Revue Algérienne, Tunisienne et Marocaine de Législation et de Jurisprudence, Vol. XLVIII, (1932), p. 65Google Scholar.
8 Liebesny, Herbert F., op. cit., pp. 75–105Google Scholar; Piquet, Victor, op. cit., pp. 285 ffGoogle Scholar.
9 Gautier, Emile-Félix, L'Afrique Blanche, op. cit., pp. 241–261Google Scholar; Piquet, Victor, op. cit., pp. 71–88, 103–128Google Scholar; he Domaine Colonial Français, op. cit., pp. 70–76.
10 Piquet, Victor, op. cit. pp. 36–41, 98–104, 250–265; Le Domaine Colonial Français, op. cit. pp. 65–69Google Scholar.
11 Piquet, Victor, op. cit., pp. 36–41Google Scholar.
12 Eisenbeth, Maurice, Les Juifs de I'Afrique du Nord—Demographic et Onomastique, (Algiers, 1936)Google Scholar.
13 The French Government had decided already before the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War in 1870 to naturalize the Algerian Jews collectively, but the execution of this decision was delayed. Cf. “Political Status of Algerian Moslems,” Free France, Vol. 5, No. 1, (01 1, 1944), pp. 23–27Google Scholar. The Crémieux decree was repealed by a Vichy law of October 7, 1940, but this repeal, in turn,’ was abrogated by an ordinance of March 17, 1943. Cf. Liebesny, Herbert J., op. cit., p. 91Google Scholar. For a more detailed discussion, compare Wysner, Glora M., “Jews and Moslems in Algeria,” The Moslem World, Vol. XXXIII, No. 4, (10 1943), pp. 287–291Google Scholar, and Arendt, Hannah, “Why the Cremieux Decree Was Abrogated,” Contemporary Jewish Record, Vol. VI, No. 2, pp. 115–124Google Scholar.
14 Français, Le Domaine Colonial, op. cit., pp. 46–61Google Scholar; Piquet, Victor, op. cit., pp. 40–41Google Scholar; Liebesny, Herbert J., op. cit., p. 97Google Scholar; Montagen, R., “La Politique Berbère de la France,” Journal of the Royal African Society, Vol. XXXIII, (1934), pp. 338–352Google Scholar.
15 Piquet, Victor, op. cit., p. 22Google Scholar.
16 Sarraut, Albert, La Mise en Valeur des Colonies Françaises, (Paris, 1923), p. 19Google Scholar. “Association” means not cooperation between equals but assimilation confined to the native elite; Cf. Wieschhoff, H. A., Colonial Policies in Africa, African Handbooks: 5. (Philadelphia, 1944), p. 91–92Google Scholar.
17 The new philosophy is hard to define but not so difficult to understand. The French Colonial Governors assembled in Brazzaville were in favor of a policy of assimilation but they thought that this policy should be carried into effect with some caution. They found opposition from cultural pluralists, but they stuck to the idea of the gradual association of native élites to the civilization of France. They made explicit their contention that native cultures should not be encouraged. These native cultures are expected to be corroded by the subtle processes of “internal progress.” This may be called the French version of indirect rule. Cf. Renaissances, Revue de la Pensée Politique Française, Vol. I, Nos. 3 and 4, (Algiers, 1944), espGoogle Scholar. articles of Lorraine, Jacques, “La Conférence de Brazzaville,” pp. 88–110Google Scholar; Laurentie, Henri, “Notes sur une philosophie de la politique coloniale Française,” pp. 1–7Google Scholar; Viard, Paul-Émile, “Essai d'une organisation constitutionelle de la ‘Communauté Française’,” pp. 8–28Google Scholar. See also Lapie, P. O., “The New Colonial Policy of France,” Foreign Affairs, (10 1944), pp. 3–10 and the memoranda of Félix Éboué (Engl. transl.). Free France, Special Issue, No. 2 (French Colonial Policy in Africa), (September 1944)Google Scholar.
18 Roberts, S. H., History of French Colonial Policy, 1870–1925, (London, 1929). Vol. I, p. 214Google Scholar.
19 We find ourselves in substantial agreement with Governor Henri Laurentie's definition (Renaissances, op. cit., p. 3): “Une colonie, quelque soit son statut politique, quels que soient les liens qui l'atlachent à la mêtropole, est essentiellement un pays où une minorité européenne s'est superposée a une majorité indigène de civilisation et de comportement différents.”
20 Engl. transl. in Free France, Vol. 5, No. 6, (03 15, 1944, p. 226–27Google Scholar.
21 Cf. Wieschhoff, H. A., op. cit., p. 95: “… members of the élite who are without positions commensurate to their training or to their expectations are apt to express their dissatisfaction most vehemently. Many leaders of the anti-French revolutionary parties in North Africa, such as the Moroccan Unity party, the Young Moroccan Movement, the Association des Oulemas Réformateurs in Algeria, or the Neo-Destour in Tunisia have as leaders, in addition to nationalistic and conservative Moslem leaders, many disappointed and dissatisfied members of the élite.”Google Scholar
22 Devereux, George and Loeb, Edwin M., “Antagonistic Acculturation,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 04 1943, pp. 133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Compare Lorraine, Jaques, op. cit. p. 92Google Scholar.
23 Recently, the nationalistic party. Amis du Manifeste, has been outlawed, its leaders arrested. The no less nationalist Parti Populaire Algérien, whose slogan is “Algeria for the Algerians,” is being carefully watched, following the Kabyle uprising. The Communist party has suffered a decline. Of course, the ups and downs of particular parties will hardly change the trend in which they all participate.
24 For the following, compare René Hoffherr et Lucien Paye, “Evolution du peuplement en Afrique de Nord” and Mesnard, G., “La regression relative des Européens en Algérie,” Démographic de la France d'Outremer, Congrès International de la Population, Vol. VI, (Paris, 1938), pp. 4–10, 11–14: both articles contain excellent statistical tablesGoogle Scholar.
25 Piquet, Victor, op. cit. pp. 98–104Google Scholar.