Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:29:33.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Communist Theory and the American Negro Question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

Political Science has long been interested in opinion. It is supposed that expressed views are indicators of behavior or potential behavior and are therefore worthy of attention as aids in understanding the present and predicting the future. While there can be little doubt that people's feelings guide their actions, we can sometimes be deceived because manifest opinion may be merely an epiphenomenon derivative from other factors, rather than vice versa. This is a problem most evident when trying to relate the true designs of an ideological movement's leadership to its pronouncements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This article is largely derived from research done for an unpublished doctoral dissertation at Yale University, 1966.Google Scholar

2 For general studies of communism and the Negro problem see, e.g., Record, Wilson, The Negro and the Communist Party (Chapel Hill N. C.., 1951);Google ScholarRecord, Race and Redicalism (Ithaca N.Y., 1964);Google ScholarDraper, Theodore, The Roots of American Communism (NewYork, 1957);Google ScholarDraper, , American Communism and Soviet Russsia (NewYork, 1960);Google ScholarNolan, William, Communism Versus the Negro (Chicago, 1951);Google ScholarShannon, David A., The Decline of American Communism (NewYork, 1959);Google Scholar and Mouledous, Joseph C., “From Browderism to Peaceful Co-Existence: An Analysis of Developments in the Communist Position on the American Negro”, Phylon, XXV, no.1, (Spring 1964), 7990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Draper, , American Communism and Soviet Russia, p. 334.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 343.

5 Stalin, J. V., Marxism and the National and Colonial Question (NewYork, 1934), p.8.Google Scholar

6 Foster, William Z., History of the Communist Party of the United States (NewYork, 1952), pp.424–32.Google Scholar

7 Wilkerson, Doxey A., “The Fight Against Segregated Schools”, Political Affairs, XXXIII, no. 7 (07, 1954), pp.4243.Google Scholar

8 Foster, William Z., “Notes on the Struggle for Negro Rights”, Political Affairs, XXXIV, no. 3 (03, 1955), pp.4041.Google Scholar

9 A Valuable work on the U.S. Negro Problem”, Kommunist, no. 8, 1955, pp. 120–27.Google Scholar

10 In an article on “Statistics and Sociology” (1917), Lenin labelled the Negroes an “oppressed nation” meriting the right to self-determination. See Lenin, V. I., Collected Works, 4th ed., vol. 23 (Moscow, 1963), p. 275.Google ScholarSee also Lenin's 1920 “These on the National and Colonial Question.” Sen Katayama once noted that Lenin had held in verbal contacts that the Negroes were a subject nation like Ireland: see Draper, American Communism and Soviet Russia, pp. 336–40.Google Scholar

11 Kolarz, Cf. Walter, Communism and Colonialism (London, 1964), p.110;Google Scholaralso, Lequeur, Walter, “The National Bourgeoisie”, in John Keep, ed., Contemporary History in the Soviet Mirror (New York, 1964). pp.155–76;Google Scholarand Bennigsen, A., “ The ‘National Front’in Communist Strategy iln the Middle East.” in Walter Lequeur, ed., The Middle East in Transition (Newyork, 1958), pp.360–70.Google Scholar

12 The Soviets originally called the 1954 decision a meaningless propaganda trick. see Kondrashov, S., “Judges and Governors”, Izvestia, 06 23, 1954, p. 4.Google Scholar

13 Editorial, “The Communist Party Convention”, Political Affairs, XXXVI, no 4 (04, 1957), p.3.Google Scholar

14 Davis, Benjamin J., The Negro People on the March, (New York, 1956).Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p.33.

16 CPUSA, Main Political Resolution Adopted by the 16th National Convention of the Communist Party, U.S.A., February 9–12, 1957, (New York, 1957).Google Scholar

17 Cf. Starobin, Joseph “1956—A Memoir,” Problem of Communism, XV, no. 6, (1112, 1966), pp.1, 64–70.Google Scholar

18 The Negro Movement in the USA in a New Stage,” Kommunist, no. 3, 1957, pp. 8899.Google Scholar

19 see CPUSA, The Negro Question in the USA: Resolution Adopted by the 17th National Convention of the Communist Party, USA, Together with the Address to the Convention by Claude Lightfoot (New York, 1960).Google Scholar

20 Ibid., pp. 20–21.

21 Marx wrote in his introduction to the Critique of Political Economy (1859), “No form of society can perish before all forces of production which it is large enough to contain are developed, and at no time will outworn conditions be replaced by new higher conditions as long as the material necessities of their existence have not been hatched in the womb of the old society itself”.Google Scholar

22 Some Aspects of the Negro Question in the United StatesWorld Marxist Review, no. 7, 1959, pp. 1624.Google Scholar

23 A New Day in the Life of the PartyWorld Marxist Review, no. 3, 1960, pp. 6871.Google Scholar

24 Gus Hall, , “Report on the 17th National Convention of the Communist Party of the USA”, Kommunist, no. 4, 1960, pp. 101112.Google Scholar

25 Sevostianov, G. N., ed., Ocherki Novoi i Noveishei Istorii SShA [Outlines of the Modern and Contemporary History of the USA] (Moscow, 1960), 2vols.Google Scholar

26 Editorial, “Africa Freedom Day”, New Times, no. 16, 04, 1960 pp. 23.Google Scholar

27 Murat, V. P., “A New Stage in the Liberation Struggle of the Negroes of the USA”, Sovietskaia Etnografia, no. 2, 1962, pp. 5158.Google ScholarSimilar view appeared simultaneously in a book by Orlova, R. D.: Vnuki Diadi Toma Boriutsia [The Grandsons of Uncle Tom are Struggling] (Moscow, 1962).Google Scholar

28 Stalin, J. V., Problems of Leninism (NewYork, 1934), p. 36.Google Scholar

29 Murat, , loc. cit., p. 51.Google Scholar

30 The Soviets in their treatment of the Negro since 1962 have been assiduous in calling it a class or social problem and minimizing the racial aspects.

31 Nitoberg, E. L., “Concerning the Negro Question in the USA”, no. 5, 1963, pp. 4155.Google Scholar

32 Lenin, V. I., The Proletarian Revolution and Renegade Kautsky (New York, 1934), p.28.Google Scholar

33 New York Times, 08 13, 1963, p. 1.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., p. 21.

35 Editorial: “On the ideological Position of the Communist Party of China,” Political Affairs, XLII, no. 10 (10., 1963), pp. 120.Google Scholar

36 Ibid., p. 12. Moreover, the CPUSA called the Chinese expectations of revolution in the USA fanciful: “This is a totally fanciful picture. Neither now nor at any other time since World War II could it be said with the remotest justification that within the United States there existed a volcano ready to erupt into outright revolution against U.S. imperialism at any moment”. Ibid., p. 14.

37 Observer, , “Argument by InvenctiveNew Times, no. 36, 09 11, 1963, pp. 89.Google Scholar

38 See especially Kondrashov, S., “The Cruel Reprisals of the Racists”, Iz-vestia, 08 17, 1965, p. 1.Google Scholar

39 See, e.g., Lightfoot, Claude, “The Path to Negro Freedom”, World Marxist Review, VIII, no. 10 (10, 1965), pp. 2029.Google Scholar

40 See, e.g., Lapitsky, I., “U.S. Communists in Congress”, New Times, no. 28 (07 13, 1966), pp. 1011.Google Scholar

41 See, e.g., “Who Pays for the Riot?”, Izvestia, 09. 2, 1964, p. 2.Google Scholar

42 See Patterson, William L., “American Realit and the Communist Party of the U.S.A.,” Partiinaia Zhizn', no 4 07, 1965, pp. 6367.Google Scholar