Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:04:01.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Evolution of Law In Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

Extract

The legal system of Thailand is a product of history. For 10 centuries it evolved in an eclectic process. Territorial expansion and external threats eventuated in new legal values and institutions. Contact with the West caused an amalgamation of indigenous and foreign laws to maintain and strengthen the kingdom. Today the law is a vital factor upholding national unity and progress during a time of international tension in Southeast Asia. In this article I propose to survey the development of law in Thailand and analyze its role in the political affairs of the nation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Nivat, Prince Dhani, “The Siamese Conception of the Monarchy,” The Siam Society Fiftieth Anniversary Commemorative Publication, Bangkok II, (Bangkok, 1954), 162Google Scholar.

2 Cited in Landon, Kenneth P., Southeast Asia: Crossroads of Religions (Chicago, 1949), pp. 103104Google Scholar.

3 Kraivichien, Thanin, “The Legal System,” Thailand 1964, Government Official Yearbook (Bangkok, 1965), p. 2Google Scholar. Thanin Kraivichien is presently serving as a Justice on the Dika (Supreme) Court in Bangkok.

4 Wilson, David A., Politics in Thailand (Ithaca, 1962), p. 88Google Scholar.

5 Dhani, Prince, op. cit., p. 163Google Scholar.

8 Vella, Walter F., The Impact of the West on Government in Thailand (Berkeley, 1955), p. 320Google Scholar.

7 Prince Dhani, loc. cit.

8 Ibid., p. 167.

9 Wood, W. A. R., A History of Siam (Bangkok, 1933), p. 86Google Scholar.

10 Ibid., p. 85.

11 Kraivichien, Thanin, op. cit., p. 4Google Scholar.

12 Roberts, Edmund, Embassy to the Eastern Courts of Cochin-China, Siam, and Muscat (New York, 1837), p. 305Google Scholar.

13 Harris, Townsend, The Complete Journal of Townsend Harris (New York, 1930), p. 153Google Scholar.

14 Kraivichien, Thanin, op. cit., pp. 67Google Scholar.

15 Hall, D. G. E., A History of Southeast Asia (London, 1955), pp. 673674Google Scholar.

16 Vella, , op. cit., p. 334Google Scholar, quoting Bangkok Calendar (1868).

17 James, Eldon R., “Yale and Harvard in Siam,” The Harvard Graduates' Magazine, XXXIV (06, 1926), 523531Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., 525.

19 Sayre, Francis B., “The Passing of Extraterritoriality in Siam,” Institute of Pacific Relations (New York, 1928), pp. 1012Google Scholar.

20 Hall, , op. cit., p. 582Google Scholar.

21 Vella, , op. cit., p. 342Google Scholar.

22 de Lapomarede, Baron, “The Setting of the Siamese Revolution,” Pacific Affairs, VII (09, 1934), 252Google Scholar.

23 Frankfurter, O., “King Mongkut,” The Siam Society Fiftieth Anniversary Commemorative Publication, I (Bangkok, 1954), 89Google Scholar.

24 Wells, Kenneth E., History of Protestant Work in Thailand (Bangkok, 1958), p. 61Google Scholar.

25 Vella, , op. cit., p. 349Google Scholar.

26 Kraivichien, Thanin, op. cit., p. 8Google Scholar.

27 Ibid., p. 16.

28 For a detailed analysis of the evolution and influence of the Thai bureaucracy see Siffin, William J., The Thai Bureaucracy (Honolulu, 1966)Google Scholar; Riggs, Fred W., Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity (Honolulu, 1966)Google Scholar; and David A. Wilson, op. cit., Chaps. V, VI.

29 Siffin, , op. cit., p. 153Google Scholar.

30 Wilson, , op. cit., p. 262Google Scholar.

31 Riggs, , op. cit., pp. 152153Google Scholar.

32 A modest step in expanding popular political participation occurred just prior to the promulgation of the 1968 constitution. In December, 1967, orderly elections were held throughout the kingdom for municipal and provincial councils (excluding the Bangkok metropolitan area). In the campaigning for these elected positions, however, certain restrictions were imposed on electioneering practices and political parties were forbidden.

33 The New Leader, March 31, 1969, p. 15.

34 Lyman, Albert, “The Judicial System of Thailand,” Journal of the Bar Association of the D.C., XXII (02, 1955), 8592Google Scholar.

35 Thanin, , op. cit., pp. 1920Google Scholar.

36 Kraivichien, Thanin, “The Bar Association and the Legal Profession,” paper delivered at the Washington World Conference on World Peace Through Law, Washington, D.C., 09 12–18, 1965, pp. 3637Google Scholar.

37 Ibid., p. 27.

38 Ibid., p. 33.