Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:51:16.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Approaches to the Study of Revolution: A Historiographic Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2009

William E. Lipsky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Crane Brinton published his Anatomy of Revolution in 1938, he noted in his bibliography fewer than thirty titles in English that dealt in general terms with revolution. Today a comprehensive listing would include some ten times that number of articles and books, and such proliferation seems likely to continue as scholars go on with their examination of revolution as a theoretical problem and in a number of theoretical and historical contexts. Like Brinton, most have taken a comparative approach, attempting to develop a conceptual framework capable of explaining the nature and the occurrence of all revolutionary movements. More recent studies, however, have moved in the direction of placing revolution in broader contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 1976 , pp. 494 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brinton, Crane, The Anatomy of Revolution (New York, 1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 The bibliography in Paynton, Clifford T. and Blackey, Robert, Why Revolution? (Cambridge, 1971), pp. 295–313Google Scholar, for example, lists some two hundred fifty titles.

3 Plato, Republic 8, 9Google Scholar; Aristotle, Politics 5Google Scholar.

4 Zagorin, Perez, “Theories of Revolution in Contemporary Historiography,” Political Science Quarterly, 88 (03, 1973), 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See Griewang, Karl, “Emergence of the Concept of Revolution,” translated from his Der Deuzeitliche Revolutionsbergriff (Weimar, 1955), pp. 171–182Google Scholar, by Lubasz, Heinz, in Lubasz, Heinz, editor, Revolutions in Modern European History (New York, 1966), pp. 55–61Google Scholar, for a discussion of the concept of revolution before the French Revolution; Arendt, Hannah, On Revolution (New York, 1965), pp. 21–28Google Scholar, and Kamenak, Eugene, “The Concept of a Political Revolution,” in Friedrich, Karl, editor, Revolution, Nomos VIII (New York, 1966), 124–136Google Scholar, both contain discussions of the impact of the French Revolution on the concept.

6 For bibliographies of the American Revolution see Greene, Jack P., “The Reappraisal of the American Revolution in Recent Historical Literature,” in The Reinterpretation of the American Revolution, ed. Greene, J. P. (New York, 1968), pp. 2–74Google Scholar, and Pole, J. R., editor, The Decision for American Independence (Philadelphia, 1975), pp. 117–124Google Scholar. For the French Revolution see Brinton, Crane, A Decade of Revolution (New York, 1963), pp. 293–323Google Scholar, and Cavanaugh, Gerald J., “The Present State of French Revolutionary Historiography: Alfred Cobban and Beyond,” French Historical Studies, 7, no. 4 (Fall, 1972), 587–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A concise but useful listing of important works on the Russian Revolution is contained in Daniels, Robert V., editor, The Russian Revolution (Englewood Cliffs, 1972), 182–184Google Scholar.

7 de Tocqueville, Alexis, The Old Regime and the French Revolution, trans. Gilbert, Stuart (New York, 1955)Google Scholar.

8 Aristotle, Politics V, 2, iiGoogle Scholar.

9 Polybius, , The Histories, VI, 9, xGoogle Scholar.

10 Hatto, Arthur, “‘Revolution’ An Enquiry into the Usefulness of a Historical Term,” Mind, 58 (10, 1949), 512Google ScholarPubMed.

11 See Tucker, Robert G., “The Marxian Revolutionary Idea,” in Friedrich, , Revolution, pp. 217–239Google Scholar, for a discussion of this theory.

12 Tocqueville, , Old Regime, pp. 169ffGoogle Scholar; Zeitlin, Irving M., Liberty, Equality and Revolution in Alexis de Tocqueville (Boston, 1971), chaps. 7 and 8Google Scholar.

13 Davies, James S., “Toward a Theory of Revolution,” American Sociological Review, 28 (02, 1962), 6Google Scholar.

14 Ibid.

15 Stone, Lawrence, “Theories of Revolution,” World Politics, 18 (1966), 172CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Kamenak, , “Concept,” pp. 122–135Google Scholar; John, Chalmers, Revolution and the Social System (Palo Alto, 1964), pp. 3–26Google Scholar; Eckstein, , “On the Etiology of Internal Wars,” History and Theory, 4, no. 2 (1965), 148–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Eckstein, , “Etiology,” pp. 148–52Google Scholar.

18 Huntington, Samuel, Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven, 1968)Google Scholar; Amann, Peter, “Revolution: A Redefinition,” Political Science Quarterly, 87 (03, 1962), 36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Sorokin, P. A., The Sociology of Revolution (Philadelphia, 1925)Google Scholar; Johnson, Revolution and the Social System.

20 Rude, George, The Crowd in the French Revolution (Oxford, 1960)Google Scholar; Gurr, Ted, Why Men Rebel (Princeton, 1971)Google Scholar; Wolfenstein, E. Victor, The Revolutionary Personality: Lenin, Trotsky, Gandhi (Princeton, 1967)Google Scholar.

21 Sorokin, Sociology; Kuttner, Alfred B., “The Cycle of Revolution,” New Republic, 20 (08 20, 1919), 86–88Google Scholar; Edwards, Lyford P., The Natural History of Revolution (New York, 1938)Google Scholar; Brinton, Anatomy.

22 Amann, “Revolution: A Redefinition”; Tilly, Charles and Rule, James, “Political Process in Revolutionary France, 1830–1832,” in 1830 and the Origins of the Social Question in France, ed. Merriman, John (New York, in press)Google Scholar.

23 Hopper, Rex D., “The Revolutionary Process: A Frame of Reference for the Study of Revolutionary Movements,” Social Forces, 28 (1950), 270–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lubasz, Heinz, “Introduction,” in Lubasz, , Revolutions, pp. 1–3Google Scholar.

24 The theories of Amann and Lubasz follow this pattern.

25 The sequences developed by Edwards, Brinton and Hopper contain stages of development subsequent to the outbreak of revolutionary violence and seizure of the government by the revolutionaries.

26 Sorokin, Sociology; Meadows, Paul, “Sequence in Revolution,” American Sociological Review, 6 (10, 1941), 702–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hopper, “Revolutionary Process”; Edwards, Natural History; Brinton, Anatomy.

27 Brinton, , Anatomy, rev. and enl., p. 21Google Scholar.

28 Edwards, Natural History.

28 Brinton, , Anatomy, rev. and enl., p. 21Google Scholar.

30 Pettee, George S., “Revolution: Typology and Process, in Fredrich, , Revolution, pp. 10–33Google Scholar.

31 Rosenau, James N., “Internal War as an International Event,” in International Aspects of Civil Strife, ed. Rosenau, J. N. (Princeton, 1964), 45–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Deutsch, Karl W., “External Involvement in Internal Wars,” in Internal Wars, ed. Eckstein, H. (Glencoe, 1964), pp. 100–110Google Scholar.

33 Tanter, Raymond and Midlarsky, Manus, “A Theory of Revolution,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11 (09, 1967), 264–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Baechler, Jean, Revolution, trans. Vickers, Joan (New York: Bannes and Noble, 1976)Google Scholar. See Hagopian, Mark N., The Phenomenon of Revolution (New York, 1974) p. 101Google Scholar, for a summary of this classification system.

35 Samuel Huntington, Political Order, chap. 5.

36 Johnson, , Revolution and the Social System, pp. 1, 26ff.Google Scholar

37 Hagopian, , Phenomenon, p. 101Google Scholar.

38 Quoted in Palmer, R. R., The Age of Democratic Revolution, vol. 1 (Princeton, 1959), iiGoogle Scholar.

39 Andrews, Charles M., “The American Revolution: An Interpretation,” American Historical Review, 31 (01, 1926), 219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gipson, Lawrence H., The Coming of the Revolution (New York, 1954)Google Scholar; Lefebvre, GeorgesThe French Revolution, 2 vols. (New York, 1962, 1964)Google Scholar; Lefebvre, Georges, “The French Revolution in the Contest of World History,” in The Eighteenth Century Revolution, ed. Amann, Peter (Boston, 1963), pp. 83–91Google Scholar.

40 Gottschalk, Louis and Lach, Donald, Toward the French Revolution: Europe and America in the Eighteenth Century World (New York, 1973)Google Scholar; Godechot, Jacques, France and the Atlantic Revolution of the Eighteenth Century (New York, 1965)Google Scholar.

41 Palmer, Age.

42 Rude, Georges, Revolutionary Europe (New York, 1966)Google Scholar.

43 Palmer, Age.

44 Hill, Christopher, The Century of Revolution (Edinburgh, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Trevor-Roper, Hugh, “The General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century,” in Crisis in Europe, ed. Aston, Trevor (Garden City, 1967), 67Google Scholar; see also E. L. Hobsbawm, “The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century,” in the same volume.

46 See especially Robertson, Priscilla, Revolutions of 1848: A Social History (Princeton, 1952)Google Scholar; and Stearns, Peter N., 1848: The Revolutionary Tide in Europe (New York, 1974)Google Scholar. Their bibliographies contain titles dealing with individual movements of the period.

47 Moore, Barrington Jr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston, 1966), esp. chaps. 7–9Google Scholar.

48 Ibid., pp. 413–414.

49 Huntington, , Political Order, pp. 8ff.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., pp. 264ff.

51 Von Laue, Theodore, Why Lenin? Why Stalin? 2d ed. (Philadelphia, 1971), especially pp. 204–216Google Scholar.

52 See Zagorin, , “Theories,” pp. 39–41Google Scholar; and Kramnick, Isaac, “Reflection on Revolution: Definition and Explanation in Recent Scholarship”; History and Theory (1972), 35–39Google Scholar, for critical analysis of Moore's and Huntington's theories.

53 Halpern, Manfred, “The Revolution of Modernization in National and International Society,” in Friedrich, , Revolution, 178–214Google Scholar.

54 Rustow, Dankwart A., “The Study of Elites,” World Politics, 18 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reizler, Kurt, “On the Psychology of Modern Revolution,” Social Research 10, (09, 1943), 320–336Google Scholar; Wolfenstein, Revolutionary Personality; see also note 22 above.

55 Rude, Crowd; Soboul, Albert, The Parisian Sans Culottes and the French Revolution (Oxford, 1964)Google Scholar.

56 Chorley, Katherine, Armies and the Art of Revolution (London, 1943)Google Scholar.

57 Carr, E. H., Studies in Revolution (London, 1950)Google Scholar; Marcuse, Herbert, Reason and Revolution (Boston, 1960)Google Scholar; Calvert, P. A. R., “Revolution: The Politics of Violence,” Political Studies, 15 (1967), 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Leiden, Carl and Schmitt, Karl M., The Politics of Violence: Revolution in the Modern World (Englewood Cliffs, 1968)Google Scholar.

58 Meisel, James, Counterrevolution: How Revolutions Die (New York, 1966)Google Scholar; Molnar, Thomas, The Counter-revolution (New York, 1969)Google Scholar; Mayer, Arno, Dynamics of Counterrevolution in Europe (New York, 1971)Google Scholar.