Article contents
American Polities in the Gilded Age
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2009
Extract
The period in American politics from Rutherford B. Hayes to William McKinley has been kicked and scuffed among historians until there is little left of its reputation. “No period so thoroughly ordinary has been known in American politics since Christopher Columbus first disturbed the balance of power in American society,” wrote Henry Adams. “One might search the whole list of Congress, Judiciary, and Executive during the twenty-five years from 1870 to 1895 and find little but damaged reputation. The period was poor in purpose and barren in results.” The impulse to spring to the aid of the underdog has brought forth champions of the cultural, literary, and technological achievements of the Gilded Age, but none to defend its political record. “Even among the most powerful men of that generation,” said Adams, speaking of the politicians, there was “none who had a good word for it.” Most historians believe that at no other time in American history was the moral and intellectual tone of political life so uniformly low nor were political contests so preoccupied with patronage.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © University of Notre Dame 1963
References
1 Adams, Henry, The Education of Henry Adams (Popular Edition, 1927), p. 294Google Scholar.
2 Ibid., p. 355.
3 Bryce, James, The American Commonwealth (1895 Edition), II, 3–4Google Scholar.
4 Ibid., (1910 Edition), p. 29.
5 Morison, Samuel Eliot and Commager, Henry Steele, The Growth of the American Republic (New York, 1952), II, 214Google Scholar.
6 McCloskey, Robert, American Conservatism in the Age of Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1951), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Charles, A. and Beard, Mary R., The Rise of American Civilization (1947 edition), II, 341Google Scholar; Carman, Henry J. and Syrett, Harold C., A History of the American People (New York, 1952), II, 248Google Scholar.
8 White, Leonard D., The Republican Era, 1869–1901 (New York 1958) pp. 21, 24, 41.Google Scholar
9 Roach, Hanna Grace, “Sectionalism in Congress, 1870–1890,” American Political Science Review, XIX (1925), 500–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Herring, E. Pendleton, The Politics of Democracy (New York, 1940), p. 102Google Scholar.
11 McLaughlin, Andrew C. “The Significance of Political Parties,” Atlantic Monthly, CI (1908), 145–156Google Scholar.
- 5
- Cited by