Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:20:12.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Praise of Insult: Slogan Genres, Slogan Repertoires and Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Elliott Colla
Elliott Colla*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have been thinking about Egyptian protest culture for a number of years, although not always as a scholar. For the bulk of that time, much of this protest culture was largely confined to particular segments of Egyptian society, activists, intellectuals and students. The major icon of this culture, Sheikh Imam, was clearly more revered outside of Egypt than at home. However, with the January 25 uprising, what was marginal became a dominant strand in contemporary Egyptian expressive culture. Like so many others, I found myself caught up in collecting, archiving and analyzing the explosion of revolutionary culture in Egypt. Among the first things I collected were slogans.

During the Eighteen-Day Uprising, I noticed that many observers treated slogans as if they were spontaneous linguistic statements of an unambiguouspopular will. This treatment both resonated and clashed with what I thoughtI knew about the history of protest culture in Egypt. On the one hand, it resonated with how activists themselves spoke about their own experiences interms of surprise and spontaneity, and how they routinely considered slogans to be clear proof-texts of an articulate collective voice. But it also clashed with the fact that some of these same activists had for years been planning and practicing just such an uprising, and chanting some of the same slogans that were to resound across Egypt on January 25. The more I listened to activists, the more I began to realize that the meaning of slogans could not be reduced to their immediate context or their semantic aspect, nor was their meaning so straightforward or stable.

Type
Special Section: Cultural Production in the Arab Spring Part I
Information
Review of Middle East Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , Summer 2013 , pp. 37 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Middle East Studies Association of North America 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Abdalla, Ahmed. 2008. The Student Movement and National Politics in Egypt, 1923-1973. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.Google Scholar
Bashir, Muhammad Gamal. 2011. Al-Ultras: cindimatata caddi al-jamahir al-tabic a. Cairo: Dar Dawwin li-1-Nashr wa-1-Tawzf.Google Scholar
Bayat, Asef. 2010. Life as Politics: How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canetti, Elias. 1962. Crowds and Power. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Carr, Sarah. 2012. “Insult Laws: Elusive and Longstanding,” Egypt independent. November 19. http://www.egyptindependent.com/news/insult-laws-elusive-and-longstanding.Accessed 1 June 2013.Google Scholar
Colla, Elliott. 2012. “The People Want,” Middle East Report 263 (Summer), http://www.menp.org/mer/mer263/people-want. Accessed 1 June 2013.Google Scholar
El-Ghobashy, Mona. 2011. “The Praxis of the Egyptian Revolution,” Middle East Report, 258 Spring. http://www.merip.org/mer/mer258/praxis-egyptian-revolution. Accessed 1 June 2013.Google Scholar
Elliott, Robert. 1960. The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Roman. 1987. “Linguistics and Poetics,” in Language in Literature, Pomorska, K. and Rudy, S., editors. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 62–94.Google Scholar
Kapchan, Deborah A. 1995. “Common Ground: Keywords for the Study of Expressive Culture,” The Journal of American Folklore 108 (430) Autumn, 479–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, Clark. 2006. “The Crowd and Collective Behavior: Bringing Symbolic Interaction Back In, Symbolic Interaction, 29 (4), 433–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mughith, Kamal. 2012. “Mundhu al-cUthmaniyyin wa-hata 25 Yanayir: Hakadhayasna ah-hitaf,” Akhbar al-Adab 982, March 11:15–22.Google Scholar
Polletta, Franscesca. 2003. It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 2000. Performance Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diane. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1992. “Rough Music Reconsidered,” Folklore 103 (1), 3–26.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2008. Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 2008. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Van Gelder, Geert. 1988. The Bad and the Ugly: Attitudes Toward Invective Poetry (Hija’) in Classical Arabic Literature. Leiden: E.J.|Brill.Google Scholar
Yusuf, Ashraf. 2011. “Fays buk ‘ala kuil zalim: al-Hitafat wa-l-lafitat fi-l-thawra al-Misriyya.” al-thawra, Kitab, Qishta, Hisham, editor, al-ukhra, al-Kitaba, 2 (2), March, 27–43.Google Scholar

Videography

Cairo. White Nights Media, “Mish nasyin al-Tahrir.” Uploaded 21 May 2011. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9AaAEhbS-Y&feature=player_embedded.Google Scholar