Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:19:41.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What attachment to peace? Exploring the normative and material dimensions of local ownership in peacebuilding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2016

Nicolas Lemay-Hébert  and
Stefanie Kappler
Nicolas Lemay-Hébert*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, International Development Department, University of Birmingham
Stefanie Kappler*
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding, Durham University
*
*Correspondence to: Dr Nicolas Lemay-Hébert, Senior Lecturer, International Development Department, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Author’s email: [email protected]
For Dr Stefanie Kappler: Lecturer in Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding, Durham University, School of Government and International Affairs, Al-Qasimi Building, Elvet Hill Road, Durham DH1 3TU, UK. Author’s email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The peacebuilding and academic communities are divided over the issue of local ownership between problem-solvers who believe that local ownership can ‘save liberal peacebuilding’ and critical voices claiming that local ownership is purely a rhetorical device to hide the same dynamics of intervention used in more ‘assertive’ interventions. The article challenges these two sets of assumptions to suggest that one has to combine an analysis of the material and normative components of ownership to understand the complex ways in which societies relate to the peace that is being created. Building on the recent scholarship on ‘attachment’, we claim that different modalities of peacebuilding lead to different types of social ‘attachment’ – social-normative and social-material – to the peace being created on the part of its subjects.

Keywords

PeaceBosnia-HerzegovinaInternational InterventionsLiberal PeaceLatour
Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 5 , December 2016 , pp. 895 - 914
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 As indicated in recent UN peace operations. See for UNAMID (Darfur): ‘UNAMID Deputy Chief visits West Darfur to meet local authorities, discuss development’, UNAMID Press Release (18 May 2014); African Union, Doc. PSC/PR/2, ‘Report of the Chairperson of the Commission on the Situation of Darfur and the Activities of the African Union – United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur’ (9 July 2014), p. 2. For MONUSCO (DRC): ‘MONUSCO sets up network for dialogue with civil society organizations in Kinshasa’, MONUSCO Featured News (12 August 2010), p. 8; Kobler, Martin, ‘Stabilizing the Democratic Republic of the Congo: MONUSCO Priorities and the Nairobi Declaration’, Chatham House, Africa Programme Summary (13 June 2014)Google Scholar. For MINUSTAH (Haiti): United Nations, UN Doc. S/RES/1927, ‘United Nations Security Council Resolution 1927’ (4 June 2010), para. 3. For UNMISS (South Sudan): United Nations, UN Doc. S/RES/1996, ‘United Nations Security Council Resolution 1996’ (8 July 2011), para. 3. The Peacebuilding Commission has also stressed the importance of ‘local ownership’. See, for example, United Nations, UN. Doc. SG/SM/10533 PBC/2, ‘Opening First Session of Peacebuilding Commission, Secretary-General Stresses Importance of National Ownership, Building Effective Public Institutions’ (26 June 2006); United Nations, UN. Doc. PBC/17, ‘Secretary General Underscores National Ownership, International Partnership in Consolidating Peace, As Peacebuilding Commission Ends First Session’ (27 June 2007).

2 An interesting point was made by LSE researchers, showing that the actual meaning of the concept of ownership differs depending on semantics. For local partners in Bosnia and Kosovo, ‘local ownership’ relates more to property rights (due to government control of companies) than to political control. Martin, Mary et al., ‘Local ownership in international peace operations – conclusions and policy recommendations’, in Mary Martin and Stefanie Moser (eds), Exiting Conflict, Owning the Peace: Local Ownership and Peacebuilding Relationships in the Cases of Bosnia and Kosovo, Study commissioned by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung and LSE (4 June 2012)Google Scholar.

3 Narten, Jens, ‘Post-conflict peacebuilding and local ownership: Dynamics of external-local interaction in Kosovo under United Nations administration’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 2:3 (2008), pp. 369–390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also, Paris, Roland, ‘Saving liberal peacebuilding’, Review of International Studies, 36:2 (2010), p. 343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Cooper, Neil, Turner, Mandy, and Pugh, Michael, ‘The end of history and the last liberal peacebuilder: a reply to Roland Paris’, Review of International Studies, 37:4 (2011), p. 2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Krogstad, Erlend Grøner, ‘Local ownership as dependence management: Inviting the coloniser back’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8:2–3 (2014), pp. 105–125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Philipsen, Lise, ‘When liberal peacebuilding fails: Paradoxes of implementing ownership and accountability in the integrated approach’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8:1 (2014), pp. 42–67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Richmond, Oliver, ‘Beyond local ownership in the architecture of international peacebuilding’, Ethnopolitics, 11:4 (2012), pp. 354–375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Latour, Bruno, We Have Never Been Modern (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993), p. 53 Google Scholar.

6 A recent study has demonstrated that liberal peace is indeed the dominant form of peace-support interventions. See Joshi, Madhav, Lee, SungYong, and Mac Ginty, Roger, ‘Just how liberal is the liberal peace?’, International Peacekeeping, 21:3 (2014), pp. 364–389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Paris, Roland, ‘International peacebuilding and the “Mission Civilisatrice”’, Review of International Studies, 28:4 (2002), p. 638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8 Richmond, Oliver, A Post-Liberal Peace (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 153 Google Scholar.

9 Bosnia-Herzegovina referred to as Bosnia or BiH from here onwards.

10 The ‘sociology of the social’ is considered by Latour to have been developed and to have become dominant since the theories of Emile Durkheim, and as such, one of the authors of this article is profoundly indebted to Durkheimian sociology. See Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, ‘The semantics of statebuilding and nationbuilding: Looking beyond neo-Weberian approaches’, in Nicolas Lemay-Hébert, Nicholas Onuf, Vojin Rakić, and Petar Bojanić (eds), Semantics of Statebuilding: Language, Meanings and Sovereignty (London: Routledge, 2014), pp. 89–105 Google Scholar; Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, ‘Statebuilding without nation-building? Legitimacy, state failure and the limits of the institutionalist approach’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 3:1 (2009), pp. 21–45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Blok, Anders and Jensen, Torben Elgaard, Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 103 Google Scholar.

12 Latour, Bruno, Reassembling the Social (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 63–86 Google Scholar.

13 Bowlby, John, Attachment and Loss (New York: Basic Books, 1969)Google ScholarPubMed.

14 Lin, Chieh-Peng, ‘Modeling corporate citizenship, organizational trust, and work engagement based on attachment theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 94:4 (2010), pp. 517–531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Giddens, Anthony, The Constitution of Society (Berkley: University of California Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

16 Hays, R. Allen and Kogl, Alexandra, ‘Neighborhood attachment, social capital building, and political participation: a case study of low‐and moderate‐income residents of Waterloo, Iowa’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 29:2 (2007), pp. 181–205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Marris, Peter, The Politics of Uncertainty: Attachment in Private and Public Life (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 43 Google Scholar.

18 Ginty, Roger Mac, International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kappler, Stefanie and Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, ‘Hybrid local ownership in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo: From discursive to material aspects of ownership’, in Sung Yong Lee and Alpaslan Özerdem (eds), Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding: Key Theoretical and Practical Issues (London: Routledge, 2015), pp. 74–92 Google Scholar.

19 Latour, Bruno, ‘Factures/fractures: From the concept of network to the concept of attachment’, RES, 36 (1999), p. 22 Google Scholar.

20 Latour, Reassembling the Social, p. 218.

21 Ibid., p. 45.

22 Ibid., p. 27.

23 Ibid., p. 79.

24 Aoi, Chiyuki, de Coning, Cedric, and Thakur, Ramesh, ‘Unintended consequences, complex peace operations and peacebuilding systems’, in Chiyuki Aoi, Cedric de Coning, and Ramesh Thakur (eds), Unintended Consequences of Peacekeeping (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2007), pp. 3–20 Google Scholar; Uberti, Luca, Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, and Demukaj, Venera, ‘Introduction: the political economy of regulation in post-war Kosovo: Intended and unintended consequences of external actors’ involvement’, East European Politics, 30:4 (2014), pp. 429–435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Thakur, Ramesh and Thayer, Carlyle, A Crisis of Expectations: UN Peacekeeping in the 1990s (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

26 Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, ‘The “empty‐shell” approach: the setup process of international administrations in Timor‐Leste and Kosovo, its consequences and lessons’, International Studies Perspectives, 12:2 (2011), pp. 190–211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Hansen, Annika and Wiharta, Sharon, ‘The transition to a just order: Establishing local ownership after conflict, a policy report’, Research report, Folke Bernadotte Academy (2007), p. x Google Scholar.

28 Lederach, John-Paul, Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation Across Cultures (New York: Syracuse University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

29 Bendix, Daniel and Stanley, Ruth, ‘Deconstructing local ownership of security sector reform: a review of the literature’, African Security Review, 17:2 (2008), pp. 93–104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Donais, Timothy, ‘Understanding local ownership in security sector reform’, in Timothy Donais (ed.), Local Ownership and Security Sector Reform (Geneva: DCAF, 2008), pp. 3–18 Google Scholar.

30 Boughton, James and Mourmouras, Alex, ‘Is Policy Ownership an Operational Concept?’, IMF Working Paper (April 2002)Google Scholar; OECD, Shaping the 21st Century (Paris: OECD, 1996)Google ScholarPubMed; Saxby, John, ‘Local Ownership and Development Co-operation – the Role of Northern Civil Society’, Issue Paper, CCDI/CIDA (5 March 2003)Google Scholar.

31 The idea of an international administration in Kosovo was first expressed by Annan on 3 May 1999 in a private meeting. See Kreilkamp, Jacob, ‘UN postconflict reconstruction’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 35:3 (2002), p. 643 Google Scholar.

32 United Nations, UN. doc. E/2002/58, ‘United Nations System Support for Capacity-building: Report of the Secretary- General’ (14 May 2002).

33 United Nations, UN. Doc. S/2004/616, ‘Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies’ (23 August 2004), para. 17.

34 United Nations, UN. Doc. SG/SM/10533 PBC/2, ‘Opening First Session of Peacebuilding Commission, Secretary-General Stresses Importance of National Ownership, Building Effective Public Institutions’ (26 June 2006).

35 United Nations, UN. Doc. PBC/17, ‘Secretary General Underscores National Ownership, International Partnership in Consolidating Peace, As Peacebuilding Commission Ends First Session’ (27 June 2007); United Nations, UN. Doc. A/63/881 S/2009/304, ‘Report of the Secretary-General on Peacebuilding in the Immediate Aftermath of Conflict’ (11 June 2009).

36 United Nations, UN. Doc. A/66/1, ‘Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization’ (26 July 2011).

37 United Nations, UN Doc. S/RES/1031, ‘Security Council Resolution 1031’ (15 December 1995), para. 26.

38 Petritsch, Wolfgang, ‘Preface’, in Christophe Solioz and Tobias Vogel (eds), Dayton and Beyond: Perspectives on the Future of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004), p. 12 Google Scholar.

39 Christian Schwarz-Schilling, ‘How to move Bosnia forward’, International Herald Tribune (1 February 2006).

40 OHR, ‘Ownership the Key to Durable Stability’ (2007), available at: {http://www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/presso/pressr/default.asp?content_id=39115}; Delegation of the European Commission to BiH, ‘Eu Newsletter: Initialling of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement: Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Road to Europe’ (2007), available at: {http://www.europa.ba/documents/delegacijaEU_2012011211053308eng.pdf}; UNDP, ‘Local Partnerships for Sustainable and Socially Inclusive Development Planning Launched’ (2010), available at: {http://www.undp.ba/index.aspx?PID=7&RID=573}; OSCE Mission to Bosnia-Herzegovina, ‘Local First: Empowering Citizens – Building Communities’ (2009), available at: {http://www.oscebih.org/documents/osce_bih_doc_2010122015464735eng.pdf}. For an overview of the EU’s peacebuilding activities in Bosnia, see Kappler, Stefanie and Richmond, Oliver, ‘Peacebuilding and culture in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Resistance or emancipation?’, Security Dialogue, 42:3 (2011), pp. 261–278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Xavier Oleiro-Ogando, Delegation of the EU in BiH, personal interview, Sarajevo, 15 March 2010.

42 Cf. Kostić, Roland, ‘“Nation-building as an instrument of peace?” Exploring local attitudes towards international nation-building building and reconciliation in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Civil Wars, 10:4 (2008), pp. 386–414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Xavier Oleiro Ogando, Delegation of the EU in BiH, personal interview, Sarajevo, 8 March 2010.

44 Ginty, Roger Mac and Richmond, Oliver, ‘The local turn in peace building: a critical agenda for peace’, Third World Quarterly, 34:5 (2013), pp. 763–783 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Cox, Robert, ‘Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond International Relations theory’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 10:2 (1981), pp. 126–155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bellamy, Alex, ‘The “next stage” in peace operations theory?’, International Peacekeeping, 11:1 (2004), pp. 17–38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Narten, Jens, ‘Dilemmas of promoting “local ownership”: the case of postwar Kosovo’, in Roland Paris and Timothy Sisk (eds), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (London: Routledge, 2009), p. 279 Google Scholar.

47 Paris, Roland, At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 179–211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Barnett, Michael, ‘Building a Republican peace: Stabilizing states after war’, International Security, 30:4 (2006), pp. 87–112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Pouligny, Beatrice, ‘Supporting Local Ownership in Humanitarian Action: Humanitarian Policy Paper Series’ 1:09 (2009), p. 5 Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.gppi.net/fileadmin/gppi/GPPiPPR_local_ownership_2009.pdf}.

49 Gordon, Eleanor, ‘Security sector reform, statebuilding and local ownership: Securing the state or its people?’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8:2–3 (2014), pp. 126–148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Scheye, Eric and Peake, Gordon, ‘Unknotting local ownership’, in Anja Ebnöther and Philipp Flüri (eds), After Intervention: Public Security Management in Post-Conflict Societies (Vienna: National Defence Academy, 2005), p. 240 Google Scholar; Richmond, , ‘Beyond local ownership’, p. 362 Google Scholar.

51 Chandler, David, ‘The liberal peace: Statebuilding, democracy and local ownership’, in Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh (ed.), Rethinking the Liberal Peace: External Models and Local Alternatives (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 87 Google Scholar.

52 Reich, Hannah, ‘“Local Ownership” in Conflict Transformation Projects: Partnership, Participation or Patronage?’, Berghof Occasional Paper 27 (September 2006), p. 7 Google Scholar.

53 Wilén, Nina, ‘Capacity-building or capacity-taking? Legitimizing concepts in peace and development operations’, International Peacekeeping, 16:3 (2009), p. 348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Newman, Edward, ‘“Liberal” peacebuilding debates’, in Edward Newman, Roland Paris, and Oliver Richmond (eds), New Perspectives on Liberal Peacebuilding (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2009), p. 50 Google Scholar.

54 Volker Boege et al., ‘On hybrid political orders and emerging states: What is failing states in the global South or research and politics in the West?’, Berghof Handbook (April 2009), p. 29.

55 Ginty, Mac, International Peacebuilding, p. 45 Google Scholar.

56 Chesterman, Simon, ‘Ownership in theory and in practice: Transfer of authority in UN statebuilding operations’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 1:1 (2007), p. 21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 A probing example is given by Matteo Tondini in the context of Afghanistan, noting that ‘some laws are officially passed by the Afghan parliament but are in fact drafted by “independent” experts hired by foreign government cooperation agencies and assigned to local institutions, while the latter are in turn pressured by international donors to cooperate.’ Tondini, Matteo, ‘From neo-colonialism to a “light footprint approach”: Restoring justice systems’, International Peacekeeping, 15:2 (2008), p. 247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Barnett, Michael and Zürcher, Christoph, ‘The peace builders contract: Statebuilding after civil war’, in Roland Paris and Timothy Sisk (eds), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding. Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (New York: Routledge, 2009), p. 33 Google Scholar.

59 Resistance agendas can be emancipatory or reactionary, depending on the context.

60 Lemay-Hébert, Nicolas, ‘The bifurcation of the two worlds: Assessing the gap between internationals and locals in state-building processes’, Third World Quarterly, 32:10 (2011), pp. 1823–1841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sandstrom, Karl, ‘Remoteness and “demonitored space” in Afghanistan’, Peacebuilding, 2:3 (2014), pp. 286–302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Duffield, Michael, ‘Risk-management and the fortified aid compound: Everyday life in post-interventionary society’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4:4 (2010), pp. 453–474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Andersson, Ruben and Weigand, Florian, ‘Intervention at risk: the vicious cycle of distance and danger in Mali and Afghanistan’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9:4 (2015), pp. 519–541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Howell, Jude and Pearce, Jenny, Civil Society & Development. A Critical Exploration (Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers, 2001), p. 16 Google Scholar; Paffenholz, Thania and Spurk, Christoph, ‘Civil Society, Civic Engagement, and Peacebuilding’, Social Development Papers: Conflict Prevention & Reconstruction, No. 36 (2006)Google Scholar.

63 Puchala, Donald, ‘Of blind men, elephants and international integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 10:3 (1971), pp. 267–284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Ginty, Mac, International Peacebuilding, p. 46 Google Scholar.

65 Simonsen, Sven Gunnar, ‘Addressing ethnic divisions in post-conflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases’, Security Dialogue, 36:3 (2005), pp. 297–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 302).

66 Ibid., p. 303.

67 Berg, Louis-Alexandre, ‘From weakness to strength: the political roots of security sector reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, International Peacekeeping, 21:2 (2014), pp. 149–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Reuters, , ‘Envoy Slams Bosnia Serbs for Questioning Srebrenica’ (21 April 2010), available at: {http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/04/21/idUSLDE63K0E2}Google Scholar.

69 Hronešová, Jessie, ‘Bakir Izetbegovic’s Oxford Speech was a Controversial History Lesson’ (5 November 2013), available at: {http://politicsinspires.org/bakir-izetbegovics-oxford-speech-controversial-history-lesson/}Google Scholar.

70 Kappler, Stefanie, ‘Everyday legitimacy in post-conflict spaces: the creation of social legitimacy in Bosnia-Herzegovina’s cultural arenas’, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 7:1 (2013), pp. 11–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Nebojša Šavija-Valha, Ambrosia, personal interview, Sarajevo, 23 March 2010.

72 Confidential source, personal interview, Sarajevo, 22 March 2010.

73 OHR, ‘Večer: Interview with HR Valentin Inzko’ (2014), available at: {http://www.ohr.int/ohr-dept/presso/pressi/default.asp?content_id=48421} accessed 1 April 2015.

74 Petritsch, Wolfgang, ‘State Capture, Citizen Protests and the European Union: How to Exit the Bosnian Quagmire’, NATO Defense College Foundation, conference report, 115-26 (2014)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.wolfgangpetritsch.com/images/conferences/2014/NDCF_Western_Balkans_07_081014.pdf}accessed 1 April 2015, pp. 116–17.

75 Ibid., p. 118.

76 Vest, Emily, ‘The war of positions: Football in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina’, unpublished PhD thesis, Brunel University, 2014, p. 256 Google Scholar.

77 Ibid., pp. 258–9.

78 Vulliamy, Ed, ‘How Bosnia’s pioneering footballers are succeeding where the politicians failed’, The Guardian (5 November 2011)Google Scholar.

79 Etchingham, Chris, ‘Time to show the “West” the real “Balkans”’, Balkanist (30 June 2015)Google Scholar, available at: {http://balkanist.net/time-show-west-real-balkans/}.

80 Vest, ‘The war of positions’, pp. 182–3.

81 OKC Abrašević, available at: {http://www.okcAbrašević.org}; translation of Carabelli, cited in Giulia Carabelli, ‘Living (critically) in the present: Youth activism in Mostar (Bosnia Herzegovina)’, European Perspectives: Journal on European Perspectives of the Western Balkans, 5:1:8 (2013), pp. 48–63 (p. 55).

82 Carabelli, , ‘Living (critically) in the present’, pp. 55–56 Google Scholar.

83 Audio lecture, OKC Abrašević, Festival: ‘Defense of Public Space, Defense of our Future’, Mostar, 15 April 2010.

84 Darko Saračević, Alter Art, personal interview, Travnik, 2 March 2011.

85 Milena Nikolić, Youth Center Srebrenica, personal interview, Srebrenica, 2 April 2010.

86 Lederach, John Paul, The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace (Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

87 See, for example, Eleonora Emkić, Gariwo, personal interview, Sarajevo, 23 April 2010.

88 S. Magdalena Schildknecht, Narko-Ne, personal interview, Sarajevo, 11 March 2010.

89 Goran Bubalo, Catholic Relief Services and Mreza Mira, personal interview, Sarajevo, 2 September 2013.

90 Belloni, Roberto, ‘Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina’, Journal of Peace Research, 38:2 (2001), pp. 163–180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Pelliciari, Igor, ‘Unaware Actors: Policies and Random Combinations of Aid Interventions in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–1995)’, Politicka misao, XXXV:5 (1998), pp. 125–135 Google Scholar (p. 132).

92 Vesna Bajsanski-Agić, Mozaik, personal interview, Sarajevo, 24 March 2010.

93 Ibid.