Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:19:12.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Security and emancipation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Ken Booth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our work Is our words, but our words do not work any more. They have not worked for some time. We can obviously start with the misleading label—‘International Politics’—which is given to our subject. As a result of this problem, I have wanted to use increasing numbers of inverted commas; but most have never seen the light of day because copy-editors have regarded them as an over-indulgence. Even so, the very temptation of these little scratches indicates that words at the heart of the subject are i n trouble:

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 313 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jackson, R. H. and Rosenberg, C. G., ‘Why Africa's Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood’, World Politics, 35 (1983), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 As happened, for example, to ‘collective security’: see Claude, Inis J., Swords Into Ploughshares (London, 1966), p. 224.Google Scholar

3 Rosenau, James R., Turbulence In World Politics, A Theory of Change and Continuity (Hemel Hempstead, 1990).Google Scholar

4 Naisbitt, John and Aburdene, Patricia, Megatrends 2000. Ten New Directions for the 1990s (New York, 1990), p. 19.Google Scholar

5 Havel, Vaclav, Living in Truth (London, 1986), especially ch. 2, ‘The Power of the Powerless’.Google Scholar

6 Nadine Gordimer took this quotation as the starting point for a novel on black-white relations in South Africa: see her July's People (London, 1981). I took it as the starting point for thinking about the present era in international politics: see New Thinking About Strategy and International Security (London, 1991).

7 This is the theme of Ornsteain, Robert and Ehrlich, Paul, New World, New Mind (London, 1989)Google Scholar.

8 New York Times, 7 September 1982, quoted in The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, February 1983, p. 3.

9 Quoted by William Safire, Safire's Political Dictionary (New York, 1978), p. 394.Google Scholar

10 The first self-consciously ‘post-modern’ book is Derian, James Der and Shapiro, Michael J. (eds.), InternationalITntertextual Relations, Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, 1990).Google Scholar

11 Fox, W. T. R., ‘Carr, E. H. and Political Realism: Vision and Revision’, Review of International Studies, 11 (1985), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 See Common Security: A Programme For Disarmament. The Report of the Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues under the Chairmanship of Olof Palme (London, 1982); North-South: A Programme For Survival. The Report of the Commission on International Development Issues under the Chairmanship of Willy Brandt (London, 1980); Alagappa, Multhiah, ‘Comprehensive Security: Interpretations in ASEAN countries’, Research Papers and Policy Studies, 26 (University of California, Berkeley, n.d.)Google Scholar; Gorbachev, Mikhail, Perestroika. New Thinking For Our Country And The World (London, 1987).Google Scholar

13 Luttwak, Edward, Strategy and History. Collected Essays, Volume Two (New Brunswick, 1985), p. xiii.Google Scholar

14 Naisbitt and Aburdene, Megatrends 200, p. 29.

15 Boulding, Kenneth, Stable Peace (Austin, 1979), passim.Google Scholar

16 The most thorough discussion is Buzan, Barry, People, States and Fear (Hemel Hempstead, 2nd edn 1991). For some definitions, see pp. 16–18.Google Scholar

17 Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London, 1977), p. 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 See, for example, David Held, ‘Central Perspectives on the Modern State’, pp . 1–55 in Held, David et al. (eds.), States and Societies (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar

19 As, for instance, in Schell, Jonathan, The Abolition (London, 1984).Google Scholar

20 See Eksteins, Modris, Rites of Spring. The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age (Boston, 1989), especially pp. xiii–xvi.Google Scholar

21 See, by way of introduction, Hoffman, Mark, ‘Critical Theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, Millenium, 16 (1987), pp. 231–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Linklater, Andrew, Beyond Realism and Marxism. Critical Theory and International Relations (London, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Sumberg, Theodore, Foreign Aid as Moral Obligation? The Washington Papers, no. 10 (Beverly Hills, 1973)Google Scholar discussed in Hoffmann, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse, 1981), p. 153.Google Scholar

23 See, for example, Thomas, Caroline, ‘New Directions in Thinking about Security in the Third World’, pp. 267–89Google Scholar in Booth, Ken (ed.), New Thinking About Strategy And International Security (London, 1991),Google Scholar and Thomas, Caroline and Saravanamuttu, Paikiasothy, eds., Conflict And Consensus In South/North Security (Cambridge, 1989).Google Scholar

24 RummelR, J. R, J., Understanding Conflict and War, vols. 1–5, (Beverley Hills, 1975–81).Google Scholar

25 Bull, The Anarchical Society, p. 87.

26 Mersheimer, John J., ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, 15 (1990), pp. 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27 Enloe, Cynthia, ‘The Gulf Crisis. Making Feminist Sense of It’, Pacific Research, 3 (1990), pp. 3–5.Google Scholar

28 See Nye, Joseph, ‘The Long-Term Future of Deterrence’, pp. 245–7Google Scholar, in Kolkowicz, Roman (ed.), The Logic of Nuclear Terror (Boston, 1987).Google Scholar

29 Boulding, Elise, Building a Global Civic Culture (Syracuse, 1988).Google Scholar

30 Bull, Hedley, ‘Order and Justice in International Relations’, Hagey Lectures (University of Waterloo, 1983), pp. 11–12 and 14.Google Scholar