Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:04:52.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejoinder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

L.S. Pressnell  and
Sheila V. Hopkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

So far from eliminating the deficiencies of his original paper, Dobson compounds them. His defamatory thesis is that Churchill sought to cheat his Cabinet. Dispassionate checking showed his documentation to be flawed, his thesis unproven. His Reply offers special pleading and further blunders. He fails to recognize that, if the basis he explicitly constructs for his suppositions collapses, it cannot support those suppositions.

Type
Discussions
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 367
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)