Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:43:04.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on the forum in the Review of International Studies: A conversation between Cristina Masters and Marysia Zalewski

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2020

Cristina Masters
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester
Marysia Zalewski*
Affiliation:
School of Law and Politics, Cardiff University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Extract

Cristina Masters (CM): The articles in this forum speak to how influential and inspiring your work is for scholars in the discipline of International Relations (IR), not least feminist scholars. Particularly, I think, for encouraging us to (re)think and (re)work with deeply familiar ‘things’ in deeply unusual – yet troublingly fecund – ways. Blood, for example, comes up quite frequently in your writing on methodology, even though it appears, as you say, an ‘unlikely candidate for methodological use’. What is so promising about blood for making sense of global politics?

Type
Forum Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zalewski, Marysia, Feminist International Relations: Exquisite Corpse (London: Routledge, 2013), p. 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Morrison, Toni, Mouthful of Blood (London: Chatto & Windus, 2019), p. 3Google Scholar.

3 Choi, Shine, ‘Redressing international problems: North Korean nuclear politics’, Review of International Studies, 46:3 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, this forum.

4 Runyan, Anne Sisson, ‘Conceptus interruptus: Forestalling sureties about violence and feminism’, Review of International Studies, 46:3 (2020)Google Scholar, this forum.

5 Zalewski, Marysia, ‘Stories of pain and longing: Reflecting on emotion, boundaries and feminism through Carrie Mathison and Carrie White’, in Åhäll, Linda and Gregory, Thomas (eds) Emotion and War (London: Routledge, 2015), pp. 3242Google Scholar.

6 UNWATCHABLE, vimeo (2011), available at: {https://vimeo.com/25341404} accessed October 2017.

7 Zalewski, Marysia, ‘Sexual violence’, in Bleiker, Roland (ed.), Visual Politics (London: Routledge, 2018), pp. 279–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Dorothea Tannng, Eine Kleine Nachtmusik (1943), available at: {https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/tanning-eine-kleine-nachtmusik-t07346}.

9 Mary Shelley's Frankenstein adapted for the stage by Rona Munro, New Theatre, Cardiff, 2019.

10 Hein, Hilde, ‘Where is the woman in feminist theory? The case of aesthetics’, Philosophic Exchange, 21:1 (1990), pp. 21–2Google Scholar.

11 Zalewski, ‘Stories of pain and longing’.

13 Morrison, Toni, Mouthful of Blood (London: Chatto & Windus, 2019), p. viiGoogle Scholar.

14 Kath Weston, Gender in Real Time: Power and Transcience in a Visual Age (London and New York: Routledge, 2002), p. 39.

15 Zalewski, Feminist International Relations.

16 Ibid., pp. 6–7.

17 Christine Blasey Ford and Judge Brett Kavanaugh testified before the US Senate Judiciary Committee to address Dr Blasey's sexual assault allegations in September 2018. See: {https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/27/kavanaugh-ford-testimony-latest-what-will-they-say-senate-hearing}.

18 See Toni Morrison interview with Jana Wendt, available at: {https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ0mMjII22I} accessed 10 January 2020.

19 See: {https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/newsbeat-50290213} accessed 8 November 2019.

20 Prügl, Elisabeth, ‘Feminist methodology between theory and praxis’, Review of International Studies, 46:3 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, this forum.

21 Zalewski, Marysia, ‘Feminist standpoint theory meets International Relations theory’, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 17:3 (1993), pp. 1332Google Scholar.

22 Zalewski, Marysia, ‘The debauching of feminist theory: The penetration of the postmodern’, Politics, 11:1 (1991), pp. 30–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Marysia Zalewski and Anne Sisson Runyan, ‘Security unbound: Spectre of feminism in Trump-time’, Critical Security Studies (2019), available at: {doi: 10.1080/21624887.2019.1685293}.

24 And as we finish the edits on this piece, we find ourselves in the middle of the coronavirus pandemic.

25 See, for example, Megan MacKenzie, ‘Is fragile masculinity the biggest obstacle to climate action’, ABC News, available at: {https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-12-15/is-fragile-masculinity-the-biggest-obstacle-to-climate-action/11797210}.

26 Eltahawy, Mona, The Seven Necessary Sins for Women and Girls (Boston: Beacon Press, 2019)Google Scholar.

27 Parpart, Jane, ‘Rethinking silence, gender, and power in insecure sites: Implications for feminist security studies in a postcolonial world’, Review of International Studies, 46:3 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, this forum.

28 In all its surprising hues.

32 Olufemi, Lola, Feminism Interrupted (London, Pluto Press, 2020), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.