Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:29:24.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neoliberal failures and the managerial takeover of governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2021

Sahil Jai Dutta Open the ORCID record for Sahil Jai Dutta [Opens in a new window] ,
Samuel Knafo  and
Ian Alexander Lovering Open the ORCID record for Ian Alexander Lovering [Opens in a new window]
Sahil Jai Dutta*
Affiliation:
Political Economy Research Centre, Goldsmiths College, University of London, United Kingdom
Samuel Knafo
Affiliation:
Politics and International Relations, Sussex University, Brighton, United Kingdom
Ian Alexander Lovering
Affiliation:
European and International Studies, Kings College, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The history of neoliberalism is a messy attempt to turn theory into practice. Neoliberals struggled with their plans to implement flagship policies of monetarism, fiscal prudence, and public sector privatisation. Yet, inflation was still cut, welfare slashed, and the public sector ‘marketised’. Existing literature often interprets this as neoliberalism ‘failing-forward’, achieving policy goals by whatever means necessary and at great social cost. Often overlooked in this narrative is how far actually existing neoliberalism strayed from the original designs of public choice theorists and neoliberal ideologues. By examining the history of the Thatcher government's public sector reforms, we demonstrate how neoliberal plans for marketisation ran aground, forcing neoliberal governments to turn to an approach of Managed Competition that owed more to practices of postwar planning born in Cold War US than neoliberal theory. Rather than impose a market-like transformation of the public sector, Managed Competition systematically empowered top managers and turned governance into a managerial process; two developments that ran directly against core precepts of neoliberalism. The history of these early failures and adjustments provides vital insights into the politics of managerial governance in the neoliberal era.

Keywords

NeoliberalismNew Public ManagementThatcherismManagerial Governance
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 2022 , pp. 484 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Konings, Martijn, ‘Rethinking neoliberalism and the subprime crisis: Beyond the re-regulation agenda’, Competition & Change, 13:2 (2009), pp. 108–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jacqueline Best, ‘The quiet failures of early neoliberalism: From rational expectations to Keynesianism in reverse’, Review of International Studies, 46:5 (December 2020), pp. 594–612.

2 Melinda Cooper, Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017).

3 Bruno Amable, ‘Morals and politics in the ideology of neo-liberalism’, Socio-Economic Review, 9:1 (1 January 2011), pp. 3–30.

4 Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution (New York, NY: Zone Books - MIT, 2015).

5 David Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007).

6 Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).

7 Colin Crouch, The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2011).

8 Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (London, UK: Penguin, 2008); Fred Block and Margaret R. Somers, The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016); Graham Harrison, ‘Authoritarian neoliberalism and capitalist transformation in Africa: All pain, no gain’, Globalizations, 16:3 (16 April 2019), pp. 274–88.

9 Bob Jessop, ‘Ordoliberalism and neoliberalization: Governing through order or disorder’, Critical Sociology, 45:7–8 (28 March 2019), pp. 967–81.

10 Peck, Jamie, Theodore, Nik, and Brenner, Neil, ‘Neoliberalism resurgent? Market rule after the Great Recession’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 111:2 (2012), p. 268CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Jamie Peck, Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010), p. 33.

12 Philip Mirowski, Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown (London, UK: Verso, 2013).

13 Best, ‘The quiet failures of early neoliberalism’.

14 Monica Prasad, The Politics of Free Markets: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany, and the United States (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006); Konings, Martijn, ‘Neoliberalism and the American State’, Critical Sociology, 36:5 (2010), pp. 741–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 For a different reading of the failures of monetarism that places the emphasis instead on a broader paradigmatic shift in monetary governance that took place in the 1980s, see Dutta, Sahil Jai, ‘Sovereign debt management and the transformation from Keynesian to neoliberal monetary governance in Britain’, New Political Economy, 25:4 (2020), pp. 675–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Peck, Jamie and Tickell, Adam, ‘Neoliberalizing space’, Antipode, 34:3 (2002), pp. 380–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Johanna Bockman, Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011).

18 Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew and Knafo, Samuel, ‘Introduction: The political economy of managerialism’, Review of International Political Economy, 27:4 (2020), pp. 763–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Dutta, Sahil Jai et al. , ‘Managers, not markets’, IPPR Progressive Review, 25:2 (2018), pp. 166–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knafo, Samuel et al. , ‘The managerial lineages of neoliberalism’, New Political Economy, 24:2 (2018), pp. 235–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Samuel Knafo, ‘Neoliberalism and the origins of public management’, Review of International Political Economy, 27:4 (2 July 2020), pp. 780–801.

20 Antonino Palumbo and Alan Scott, Remaking Market Society: A Critique of Social Theory and Political Economy in Neoliberal Times (New York, NY: Routledge, 2017).

21 Leslie Alexander Pal, Frontiers of Governance: The OECD and Global Public Management Reform (New York, NY: Springer, 2012).

22 Peck, Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, p. 22.

23 Peck, Constructions of Neoliberal Reason; Loïc Wacquant, ‘Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism’, Social Anthropology, 20:1 (2012), pp. 66–79; Damien Cahill, The End of Laissez Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2014); Cemal Burak Tansel (ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2016).

24 Wacquant, ‘Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism’.

25 Fred Block and Margaret R. Somers, The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi's Critique (repr. edn, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016).

26 Ian Bruff and Kathryn Starnes, ‘Framing the neoliberal canon: Resisting the market myth via literary enquiry’, Globalizations, 16:3 (16 April 2019), pp. 245–59.

27 Quinn Slobodian, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018).

28 Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution (Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books, 2015), p. 31.

29 William Davies, The Limits of Neoliberalism (Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2014), p. 160.

30 Davies, The Limits of Neoliberalism.

31 Aucoin, Peter, ‘Administrative reform in public management: Paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums’, Governance, 3:2 (1990), pp. 115–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hood, Christopher, ‘A public management for all seasons?’, Public Administration, 69:1 (1991), pp. 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Nancy MacLean, Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America (New York, NY: Viking Press, 2017).

33 F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (2nd edn, London: Routledge, 2001).

34 Philip Mirowski and Edward M. Nik-Khah, The Knowledge We Have Lost in Information: The History of Information in Modern Economics (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017).

35 Best, ‘The quiet failures of early neoliberalism’.

36 Samuel Knafo, ‘Rethinking neoliberalism after the Polanyian turn’, Review of Social Economy (4 March 2020), pp. 1–26.

37 Jamie Peck and Adam Tickell, ‘Searching for a new institutional fix: The after-Fordist crisis and the global-local disorder’, in Post-Fordism (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1994), pp. 280–315.

38 Rajesh Venugopal, ‘Neoliberalism as concept’, Economy and Society, 44:2 (3 April 2015), pp. 165–87, available at: {https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2015.1013356}.

39 This point was made very effectively by British filmmaker Adam Curtis in his BBC documentary The Trap.

40 Mie Augier and James G. March, The Roots, Rituals, and Rhetorics of Change: North American Business Schools After the Second World War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2011).

41 Knafo, ‘Neoliberalism and the origins of public management’.

42 Sonja Michelle Amadae, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2003).

43 H. S. Banzhaf, ‘Consumer surplus with apology: A historical perspective on nonmarket valuation and recreation demand', Annual Review of Resources Economics, 18:2 (2009), pp. 1–25.

44 Philip Mirowski, Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008).

45 H. Heyck, ‘The organizational revolution and the human sciences’, Isis, 105:1 (2014), pp. 1–31.

46 Elizabeth Popp Berman, Thinking Like an Economist: How Economics Became the Language of U.S. Public Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, forthcoming).

47 William F. West, Program Budgeting and the Performance Movement: The Elusive Quest for Efficiency in Government (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011), p. 22.

48 Michele Chwastiak, ‘Rationality, performance measures and representations of reality: Planning, programming and budgeting and the Vietnam War’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17:1 (January 2006), pp. 29–55.

49 Jeffrey L. Pressman and Aaron Wildavsky, Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984).

50 Alex Abella, Soldiers of Reason: The RAND Corporation and the Rise of the American Empire (repr. edn, Boston: Mariner Books, 2009).

51 David R. Jardini, ‘Out of blue yonder: The transfer of systems thinking from the Pentagon to the Great Society’, in Agatha Hughes and Thomas Hughes (eds), Systems, Experts and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), pp. 311–59; Jennifer S. Light, From Warfare to Welfare: Defense Intellectuals and Urban Problems in Cold War America (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).

52 Jacqueline Best, Governing Failure (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014).

53 Berman, Thinking Like an Economist.

54 Knafo, ‘Neoliberalism and the origins of public management’.

55 Allen Schick is another prominent US expert on PPBS in the 1960s, who later became a central voice in the NPM movement via the OECD.

56 Alain C. Enthoven, Theory and Practice of Managed Competition in Health Care Finance (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988); Alain C. Enthoven, ‘Managed competition: An agenda for action’, Health Affairs, 7:3 (1 January 1988), pp. 25–47; Alain C. Enthoven, ‘The history and principles of managed competition’, Health Affairs, 12:suppl 1 (1 January 1993), pp. 24–48.

57 Enthoven, ‘The history and principles of managed competition’, p. 44.

58 Enthoven, ‘Managed competition’.

59 Enthoven, ‘The history and principles of managed competition’.

60 Thomas Biebricher and Frieder Vogelmann (eds), The Birth of Austerity: German Ordoliberalism and Contemporary Neoliberalism (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).

61 Block and Somers, The Power of Market Fundamentalism; David Harvey, A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007).

62 Comprehensive schools are the British term for non-selective, state-run schools free at the point of use.

63 Scotland runs a separate education system.

64 Clyde Chitty, Towards a New Education System: The Victory of the New Right? (Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 1989), pp. 50–1.

65 Kathryn Riley, Whose School Is It Anyway?: Power and Politics (London, UK and Bristol, PA: Routledge, 1998).

66 Bernard Donoughue, Prime Minister: The Conduct of Policy under Harold Wilson and James Callaghan, Vol. 1 (New York, NY: Vintage, 1987), p. 109; Chitty, Towards a New Education System, p. 72.

67 ASI, ‘Health and Social Services Policy’, Omega Report (London, UK: Adam Smith Institute, 1984).

68 Conservative Party, ‘The Right Approach’ (London, UK: Conservative Central Office, 1976). As it was put: ‘We see no reason for quantitative controls over the development of the private sector outside the NHS’: Conservative Party.

69 Scrutator, ‘The week: A personal view of current medicopolitical events’, British Medical Journal, 1:6175 (1979), p. 1434.

70 CPS, ‘The Litmus Papers: A National Health Dis-Service’ (London: Centre for Policy Studies, 1980), p. 112.

71 Conservative Party Policy Unit, ‘Mount Minute to MT (“Public Expenditure in the Longer Term”): September 8 1982’, Thatcher MSS (Churchill Archive Centre), THCR 1/15/5A Part 2 f15, 1982, available at: {https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/123005}.

72 Stephen Harrison, National Health Service Management in the 1980s: Policymaking on the Hoof? (Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, VT: Avebury, 1994).

73 Economist, ‘Thatcher's think-tank takes aim at the Welfare State’, The Economist Historical Archive, 1843–2015 (18 September 1982).

74 Alan Travis, ‘Thatcher pushed for breakup of Welfare State despite NHS pledge’, The Guardian (25 November 2016), Politics section, available at: {http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/25/margaret-thatcher-pushed-for-breakup-of-welfare-state-despite-nhs-pledge}.

75 Milton Friedman, ‘The role of government in education’, in Robert A. Solo (ed.), Economics and the Public Interest (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1955).

76 Edwin G. West, Education and the State: A Study in Political Economy (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund Inc., 1965); Alan T. Peacock and Jack Wiseman, Education for Democrats (Kingston, RI: University Of Rhode Island, 1970); Rhodes Boyson, ‘The developing case for the education voucher’, in C. B. Cox, Rhodes Boyson, and Kingsley Amis (eds), Black Paper 1975: The Fight for Education (London, UK: Dent, 1975), pp. 27–8.

77 Arthur Seldon, The Riddle of the Voucher: An Inquiry into the Obstacles to Introducing Choice and Competition in State Schools (London, UK: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1986), p. 17.

78 Margaret Thatcher, The Downing Street Years (New York, NY: Harper Perennial, 1995), p. 498.

79 Conservative Party, ‘General Election Manifesto’ (1979).

80 Margaret Thatcher, ‘Speech to Conservative Party Conference, 14 October 1983, Blackpool’ (1983), available at: {https://www.margaretthatcher.org/document/105454}.

81 As late as 1988, ministers Oliver Letwin and John Redwood were publishing papers for the CPS advocating private insurance and a voucher scheme to reform the NHS.

82 Seldon, The Riddle of the Voucher, pp. 36–7.

83 Hansard, ‘Education Vouchers', HC Deb Vol. 62, col. 290W (22 June 1984), available at: {https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/1984/jun/22/education-vouchers}.

84 Ibid.

85 Charles Moore, Margaret Thatcher: The Authorized Biography, Volume One: Not For Turning (London, UK: Penguin, 2013).

86 Antony Flew, Power to the People! (London, UK: Centre for Policy Studies, 1983).

87 Seldon, The Riddle of the Voucher, p. 40.

88 Ibid., p. 40.

89 Ibid., p. 41.

90 Ibid.

91 Ken Jones, Right Turn: The Conservative Revolution in Education (London, UK: Radius Books, 1989), pp. 16–17.

92 Ibid., p. 30.

93 Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 513.

94 The institutional historical detail about NHS reforms draws on S. Harrison, National Health Service Management in the 1980s. Policy Making on the Hoof?, Vol. 31 (Aldershot, UK: Avebury, 1994).

95 DHSS, ‘Griffiths Report on NHS October 1983’ (London: Department of Health and Social Security, 1983).

96 DHSS, ‘Performance Indicators: National Summary for 1981’ (London: Department of Health and Social Security, 1983).

97 BMJ, ‘Business management for the NHS?’, British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition), 287:6402 (1983), pp. 1321–2.

98 Alain C. Enthoven, ‘Reflections on the Management of the National Health Service’ (London: Nuffield Trust, 1985).

99 Iden Wickings et al., ‘Talking point: Review of clinical budgeting and costing experiments’, British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition), 286:6364 (1983), p. 575.

100 Ibid., p. 576.

101 Alistair M. Preston, David J. Cooper, and Rod W. Coombs, ‘Fabricating budgets: A study of the production of management budgeting in the National Health Service’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17:6 (1 August 1992), p. 575.

102 BMJ, ‘Special Report of the Council of the British Medical Association on the government's White Paper “Working for Patients”’, British Medical Journal, 298:6679 (1989), pp. 3–20.

103 S. T. Walby and J. Greenwell, ‘Managing the NHS’, in John Clarke, Allan Cochrane, and Eugene McLaughlin (eds), Managing Social Policy (Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994), p. 68.

104 Thatcher, The Downing Street Years, p. 517.

105 Stuart Maclure (ed.), Education Re-Formed: Guide to the Education Reform Act (London, UK: Hodder Arnold H&S, 1992), p. 55.

106 Coopers and Lybrand, ‘Local Management of Schools: A Report to the Department of Education and Science’ (London, UK: Coopers & Lybrand, 1988), p. 5.

107 Ibid., p. 7.

108 Stephen J. Ball, ‘The legacy of ERA, privatization and the policy ratchet’, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36:2 (1 April 2008), pp. 185–99.

109 Ross Fergusson, ‘Managerialism in education’, in Clarke, Cochrane, and McLaughlin (eds), Managing Social Policy, p. 94.

110 Riley, Whose School Is It Anyway?, p. 52.

111 Stephen J. Ball, ‘Education policy, power relations and teachers’ work’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 41:2 (1993), pp. 106–21.

112 Roy Lowe, The Death of Progressive Education: How Teachers Lost Control of the Classroom (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2007), p. 103.

113 Quoted in Chitty, Towards a New Education System.

114 Ibid.

115 John Tomlinson, ‘Curriculum and market: Are they compatible’, in Julian Haviland (ed.), Take Care, Mr. Baker! The Advice on Education Reform Which the Government Collected But Concealed (London, UK: Fourth Estate Ltd, 1988), p. 10.

116 Peter James Downes, Local Financial Management in Schools (New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Education, 1988), p. 50.

117 Sharon Gewirtz, The Managerial School: Post-Welfarism and Social Justice in Education (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2002).

118 Jim M. Spinks and Brian J. Caldwell, The Self-Managing School (London, UK: Routledge, 1988).

119 Tony Bush, ‘Crisis or crossroads?: The discipline of educational management in the late 1990s’, Educational Management & Administration, 27:3 (1 July 1999), p. 239.

120 Pat Mahony, Ian Hextall, and Ian Menter, ‘Building dams in Jordan, assessing teachers in England: A case study in edu-business’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2:2 (1 July 2004), p. 18.

121 Most notably, national strategies on literacy and numeracy in the early 2000s were primarily delivered by firms like Capita Richard Hatcher, ‘Privatization and sponsorship: The re-agenting of the school system in England’, Journal of Education Policy, 21:5 (1 September 2006), pp. 599–619.

122 Stephen J. Ball, Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neo-Liberal Imaginary (Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2012). Corporate involvement in education even extended as far as entirely running LEA functions for those deemed as ‘failing’ by OfSTED or through ‘partnerships’ between companies and LEAs, such as through the 2001 £1.8 million ‘New Ways of Working’ project. Hatcher, ‘Privatization and sponsorship’, p. 602.

123 Klein, The Shock Doctrine.

124 Martijn Konings, Capital and Time: For a New Critique of Neoliberal Reason (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2018).

125 Lee Jones and Shahar Hameiri, ‘COVID-19 and the failure of the neoliberal regulatory state’, Review of International Political Economy (1 March 2021), pp. 1–25.

126 Whiteside, Heather, ‘Public-private partnerships: market development through management reform’, Review of International Political Economy, 27:4 (2020), pp. 880–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

127 Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew, ‘The rise of managerialism in international NGOs’, Review of International Political Economy, 27:4 (2020), pp. 970–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

128 Sharma, Sarah and Soederberg, Susanne, ‘Redesigning the business of development: The case of the World Economic Forum and global risk management’, Review of International Political Economy, 27:4 (2020), pp. 828–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

129 Brett Christophers, Rentier Capitalism: Who Owns the Economy, and Who Pays for It? (Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2020).

130 Birch, Kean and Springer, Simon, ‘Peak neoliberalism? Revisiting and rethinking the concept of neoliberalism’, Ephemera, 19:3 (2019), pp. 467–85Google Scholar.