Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:03:14.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LGBT recognition in EU accession states: How identification with Europe enhances the transformative power of discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2016

George Vasilev
George Vasilev*
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Politics, La Trobe University
*
* Correspondence to: George Vasilev, Lecturer in Politics at La Trobe University, Melbourne. Author’s email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the EU accession literature, there is a tendency to downplay the role of discourse in facilitating norm diffusion, particularly when domestic resistance towards European norms is strong. The assumptions in this thinking are that critical deliberations and civil society activism simply lack the potency required to elicit norm conforming behaviour in accession states and that the only realistic hope for achieving this rests with the introduction of material incentives that make the costs of normative adaptation lower than its rewards. I focus on developments in the field of LGBT politics to challenge these assumptions and to specify the conditions under which discursive strategies are likely to stimulate the domestic uptake of contentious norms. I highlight shared identity as a crucial factor in the success of discursive influence, contending that under conditions of identity convergence, a cultural environment prevails in which norm promoters can more effectively ignite a process of deliberative reflection, shame norm-violators into conformance and cultivate resonance around controversial ideas. I develop these arguments through an analysis of LGBT and accession politics in Croatia and Serbia, contending that Croatia’s strong identification with Europe accelerated LGBT recognition there while Serbia’s relatively weaker identification with Europe slowed it down.

Keywords

EuropeanisationNorm DiffusionLGBT RightsCroatiaSerbiaConditionality
Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 748 - 772
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kelley, Judith, ‘International actors on the domestic scene: Membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions’, International Organization, 58 (2004), pp. 425–457 Google Scholar; Checkel, Jeffrey T., ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 801–826 Google Scholar; Schimmelfennig, Frank, ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization: Membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 827–860 Google Scholar; Vachudova, Milada Anna, Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

2 Vachudova, Europe Undivided, p. 106.

3 Ibid., p. 63; see also Kelley, ‘International actors on the domestic scene’; Schimmelfennig, ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization’.

4 Kochenov, Dimitry, ‘Democracy and human rights – not for gay people? EU eastern enlargement and its impact on the protection of the rights of sexual minorities’, Texas Wesleyan Law Review, 13 (2007), pp. 7–8 Google Scholar; O’Dwyer, Connor and Schwartz, Katrina Z. S., ‘Minority rights after EU enlargement: a comparison of antigay politics in Poland and Latvia’, Comparative European Politics, 8:2 (2010), p. 233 Google Scholar.

5 Ayoub, Phillip M. and Paternotte, David, ‘Building Europe: the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) and LGBT activism in Central and Eastern Europe’, Perspectives on Europe, 42:1 (2012), pp. 53–54 Google Scholar.

6 Fraser, Nancy, Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition (New York: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., p. 18.

8 Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics’, International Social Science Journal, 51:59 (1999), pp. 89–101 Google Scholar; Dryzek, John, Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 119–122 Google Scholar; Ayoub, Phillip M., ‘Cooperative transnationalism in contemporary Europe: Europeanization and political opportunities for LGBT mobilization in the European Union’, European Political Science Review, 5:2 (2013), pp. 286–287 Google Scholar.

9 Ayoub, Phillip M., ‘Contested norms in new adopter states: International determinants of LGBT rights legislation’, European Journal of International Relations, onlinefirst, 10.1177/1354066114543335 (2014a), p. 10 Google Scholar.

10 Bukovansky, Mlada et al., Special Responsibilities (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 56–57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 64.

11 Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (New York: Vintage, 1990)Google Scholar.

12 Kochenov, ‘Democracy and human rights’, pp. 30–2; Kuhar, Roman, ‘Use of the Europeanization frame in same sex partnership issues across Europe’, in Emanuela Lombardo and Maxime Forest (eds), The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive Sociological Approach (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), pp. 169 Google Scholar, 70.

13 O’Dwyer and Schwartz, ‘Minority rights after EU enlargement’, p. 233; Ayoub, ‘Cooperative transnationalism in contemporary Europe’, p. 285.

14 Ayoub and Paternotte, ‘Building Europe’, pp. 52–3; Kuhar, ‘Use of the Europeanization frame’, p. 184; Kahlina, Katja, ‘Local histories, European LGBT designs: Sexual citizenship, nationalism, and “Europeanisation” in Post-Yugoslav Croatia and Serbia’, Women’s Studies International Forum (2014), p. 2 Google Scholar.

15 Jepperson, Ronald L., Wendt, Alexander, and Katzenstein, Peter J., ‘Norms, identities, and culture in national security’, in Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 54 Google Scholar.

16 Bukovansky et al., Special Responsibilities, p. 60.

17 Checkel, , ‘International institutions’, pp. 810–811 Google Scholar.

18 Schimmelfennig, ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization’, pp. 831–2; Vachudova, Europe Undivided, p. 60.

19 Risse, Thomas, ‘“Let’s argue!”: Communicative action in world politics’, International Organization, 54:1 (2000), pp. 1–2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 , Checkel, ‘International institutions’, p. 804 Google Scholar.

21 Habermas, Jürgen, Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics (Cambridge: MIT, 1994)Google Scholar.

22 Risse, Thomas and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction’, in Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 15 Google Scholar; Johnston, Alastair Iain, Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980–2000 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008), pp. 74–88 Google Scholar.

23 Entman, Robert, ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication, 43:4 (1993), pp. 53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 55.

24 , Schimmelfennig, ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization’, pp. 828–829 Google Scholar, 51, 55; Kelley, ‘International actors on the domestic scene’, pp. 426, 34–5.

25 For a description of this sequential socialisation model, see Checkel, ‘International institutions’, pp. 808–14.

26 Schimmelfennig, ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization’, p. 828.

27 Ibid.

28 Gheciu, Alexandra, ‘Security institutions as agents of socialisation? NATO and the “New Europe”’, International Organization, 59 (2005), pp. 994–1003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Kochenov, ‘Democracy and human rights’, pp. 7–8; O’Dwyer and Schwartz, ‘Minority rights after EU enlargement’, p. 233.

30 For example, the European Commission assessed Romania as having adequately met human rights standards during its EU accession, despite the de facto criminalisation of same-sex relations there. For further examples, see Kochenov, ‘Democracy and human rights’, pp. 16, 19.

31 O’Dwyer, Connor, ‘Does the EU help or hinder gay-rights movements in postcommunist Europe? The case of Poland’, East European Politics, 28:4 (2012), pp. 333–334 Google Scholar; Ayoub, ‘Contested norms in new adopter states’.

32 Ayoub, , ‘Cooperative transnationalism in contemporary Europe’, pp. 290–291 Google Scholar.

33 Vachudova, Europe Undivided; Kelley, ‘International actors on the domestic scene’.

34 Vasilev, George, ‘Minority rights activism beyond borders: the synergies between deliberation and strategic action’, Policy Studies, 36:3 (2015), pp. 329–344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Jepperson, , Wendt, , and Katzenstein, , ‘Norms, identities, and culture in national security’, p. 59 Google Scholar.

36 Ibid.

37 Kingwell, Mark, A Civil Tongue: Justice, Dialogue, and the Politics of Pluralism (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), pp. 47–48 Google Scholar.

38 Vasilev, George, ‘Preaching to the choir or converting the uninitiated? The integrative potential of in-group deliberations’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16:1 (2013), p. 115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Johnston, , Social States, pp. 79–88 Google Scholar.

40 Ibid., p. 86.

41 Entman, ‘Framing’, p. 55.

42 Acharya, Amitav, ‘How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism’, International Organization, 58 (2004), p. 248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Subotić, Jelena, ‘Europe is a state of mind: Identity and Europeanization in the Balkans’, International Studies Quarterly, 55 (2011), p. 316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Ibid., p. 319.

45 Ibid., pp. 315–16. See also Hansen, Lene, Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 39–40 Google Scholar

46 Stojić, Marko, ‘The Changing Nature of Serbian Political Parties’ Attitudes Towards Serbian EU membership’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sussex, Brighton, 2010), p. 22 Google Scholar.

47 Ibid., p. 30.

48 Subotić, Jelena, ‘Explaining difficult states: the problems of Europeanization in Serbia’, East European Politics and Societies, 24:4 (2010), p. 612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Cited in Stojić, ‘The Changing Nature’, p. 30.

50 Subotić, ‘Explaining difficult states’, p. 321.

51 Stojić, ‘ The Changing Nature’.

52 Stakić, Isidora, ‘Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse: How nationalist myths and stereotypes influence prejudices against the LGBT minority’, The Equal Rights Review, 7 (2011), pp. 44–65 Google Scholar.

53 The qualitatively oriented discourse analysis I employ to infer causation comes with certain trade-offs when weighed against a quantitatively oriented approach, such as a numerically grounded content analysis. The narrative detail and longitudinal freedom afforded by a discourse analysis permits a richer description of political events and scope for observed statements to be explained within their cultural and historical contexts. However, this gain in narrative and contextual detail is won at the cost of statistical verifiability, which a content analysis provides by measuring the frequency of indexed terms during a clearly defined period of scrutiny. I have sought to minimise selection bias and ensure my inferences remain congruent with empirical realities by triangulating across multiple data sources and conducting a structured reading of media statements and parliamentary discussions. The data sources of primary relevance for pursuing my research objectives have been those focusing on public sphere communications, as these sources illustrate how representations of European identity function to legitimate or undermine policy choices affecting LGBT populations.

54 Juričić, Marko, ‘Povijest LGBTIQ aktivizma u Hrvatskoj [History of LGBTIQ activism in Croatia]’, in Aida Spahić and Saša Gavrić (eds), Čitanka LGBT Ljudskih Prava [LGBT Human Rights Reader] (2nd edn, Sarajevo: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2012), pp. 89–100 Google Scholar; Vasić, Vladana, ‘LGBT aktivizam u Srbiji [LGBT activism in Serbia]’, in Aida Spahić and Saša Gavrić (eds), Čitanka LGBT Ljudskih Prava, pp. 101–110 Google Scholar.

55 Sagasta, Sanja, ‘Lesbians in Croatia’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 8:3 (2001), pp. 357–372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stakić, ‘Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse’.

56 Hodžić, Amir, ‘Queer migration in and out of Croatia: Waitressing is an awful job when you’re gay in a straight bar’, Anthropology of East Europe Review, 28:2 (2010), p. 271 Google Scholar.

57 ‘Human Rights Watch, ‘Croatia: Don’t force change in Pride march route’, Human Rights Watch (31 May 2012), available at: {http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/05/31/croatia-don-t-force-change-pride-march-route} accessed 31 May 2014; Boris Pavelic, ‘Croat Police to secure Split Gay Pride’, Balkan Insight (5 June 2012), available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/police-to-secure-threatened-croatian-gay-pride} accessed 9 February 2015.

58 Danish Institute for Human Rights, ‘Study on Homophobia, Transphobia and Descrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Sociolological Report: Croatia’ (Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights, 2010), p. 7; Intergroup on LGBT Rights, ‘Unsafe Pride event in Croatia casts shadow over accession prospects’, Intergroup on LGBT Rights (13 June 2011), available at: {http://www.lgbt-ep.eu/press-releases/unsafe-pride-event-in-croatia-casts-shadow-over-accession-prospects} accessed 13 June 2014.

59 Stakić, ‘Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse’, p. 44.

60 Nielsen, Christian Axboe, ‘The cyclical farce of Serbian Gay Pride’, Balkan Insight (7 October 2013)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/the-cyclical-farce-of-serbian-gay-pride} accessed 11 February 2015.

61 Stakić, ‘Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse’.

62 Subotić, ‘Explaining difficult states’, p. 600; International Crisis Group, ‘Serbia and Kosovo: the path to normalisation’, Serbia and Kosovo: The Path to Normalisation (Brussels, 2013).

63 Lucarelli, Sonia, ‘Interpreted values: a normative reading of EU role conceptions and performance’, in Ole Engström and Michael Smith (eds), The European Union’s Roles in International Politics: Concepts and Analysis (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 49–52 Google Scholar.

64 Manners, Ian, ‘Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:2 (2002), p. 244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Danish Institute for Human Rights, ‘Study on Homophobia’, p. 6; Hodžić, ‘Queer migration in and out of Croatia’, pp. 272–3; Dioli, Irene, ‘From globalization to Europeanization – and then? Transnational influences in lesbian activism of the Western Balkans’, Journal of Lesbian Studies, 15 (2011), p. 315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

66 Intergroup on LGBT Rights, ‘Belgrade Pride banned for third year sends wrong signal for accession, MEPs say’ (30 September 2013), available at: {http://www.lgbt-ep.eu/press-releases/belgrade-pride-banned-for-third-year-sends-wrong-signal-for-accession-meps-say/} accessed 11 February 2015; European Parliament, ‘European Parliament Resolution of 18 April 2013 on the 2012 Progress Report on Serbia’ (Strasbourg: 2013).

67 European Parliament, ‘Hate Violence During Pride Event in Split, Croatia: Impact on Accession. Question for Written Answer’ (2011).

68 Intergroup on LGBT Rights, ‘Unsafe Pride event in Croatia’; Balkan Insight, ‘Belgrade Pride 2014: Live blog’, Balkan Insight (28 September 2014), available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/belgrade-pride-2014-live-blog} accessed 11 February 2015.

69 Ayoub, ‘Contested norms in new adopter states’, p. 19.

70 Barlovac, Bojana, ‘Serbian parties shun grilling on Gay rights’, Balkan Insight (25 April 2012)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbian-political-parties-requested-to-reveal-stance-on-gay-rights} accessed 11 February 2015.

71 Intergroup on LGBT Rights, ‘Belgrade Pride banned for third year’.

72 Barlovac, Bojana, ‘Croatia gives Split Pride heavy police guard’, Balkan Insight (5 June 2012)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/police-to-secure-threatened-croatian-gay-pride} accessed 8 June 2014.

73 Ristić, Maria, ‘Serbian PM to give Gay pride a miss’, Balkan Insight (25 September 2014)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/vucic-says-no-to-belgrade-pride-march} accessed 11 February 2015.

74 Ibid.

75 Barlovac, Bojana, ‘Criticism of Serbia’s rights record upsets progressives’, Balkan Insight (11 December 2012)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/serbia-ngos-criticize-govt-over-human-rights} accessed 11 February 2015.

76 Rettman, Andrew, ‘Gay rights not decisive for Serbia-EU talks’, EU Observer (4 October 2012)Google Scholar, available at: {https://euobserver.com/enlargement/117756} accessed 11 February 2015.

77 Nielsen, ‘The cyclical farce of Serbian Gay Pride’.

78 Seyward, Darby, ‘Croatia: Pride and prejudice’, Transitions Online (Prague: 2008), p. 1 Google Scholar.

79 Human Rights Watch, ‘Croatia: Don’t Force Change in Pride March Route’.

80 International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Intersex Association-Europe (ILGA-Europe), ‘ILGA-Europe Annual Review 2011’ (Brussels: ILGA-Europe, 2012), p. 55.

81 Ibid.

82 ILGA-Europe, ‘ILGA-Europe Annual Review 2013’ (Brussels: ILGA-Europe, 2014), p. 70.

83 Ibid., pp. 70–1.

84 Danish Institute for Human Rights, ‘Study on Homophobia’, p. 3.

85 Sagasta, ‘Lesbians in Croatia’, pp. 360–1; Kuhar, Roman, ‘Resisting change: Same-sex partnership policy debates in Croatia and Slovenia’, Südosteuropa, 59 (2011), p. 31 Google Scholar.

86 tportal.hr, ‘Zagreb Pride Oborio Rekord, Okupilo se 15.000 Ljudi!’ (15 June 2013), available at: {http://www.tportal.hr/vijesti/hrvatska/268300/Ukljucite-se-u-prijenos-Zagreb-Pridea-na-tportalu.html} accessed 11 February 2015.

87 Hodžić, ‘Queer migration in and out of Croatia’, pp. 272, 274.

88 Pavlović, Tatjana, ‘Women in Croatia: Feminists, nationalists, and homosexuals’, in Sabrina P. Ramet and Branka Magaš (eds), Gender Politics in the Western Balkans (University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), pp. 146–147 Google Scholar.

89 Bojana Barlovac, ‘Croatia gives Split Pride heavy police guard’.

90 Ibid.

91 Bojana Barlovac, ‘Second Split Gay Pride passes without incidents’, Balkan Insight (11 June 2012), pable at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/second-split-gay-pride-passes-without-incidents} accessed 11 February 2015.

92 Pavelic, Boris, ‘Thousands march for Gay rights in Croatia’, Balkan Insight (11 June 2012)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/more-than-10-000-support-gay-rights} accessed 11 February 2015.

93 Cited in Kahlina, ‘Local histories, European LGBT designs’, p. 6.

94 Pavelic, Boris, ‘Croatian PM denounces anti-Gay marriage vote’, Balkan Insight (2 December 2013)Google Scholar, available at: {http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/croatian-pm-denounces-anti-gay-marriage-vote} accessed 4 July 2015.

95 Pride, Zagreb, ‘Croatian parliament passed Same Sex Life-Partnership Act’, Zagreb Pride (Zagreb, 2014)Google Scholar.

96 ILGA-Europe, ‘Country Ranking’, available at: {http://www.ilga-europe.org/sites/default/files/Attachments/country_ranking.png} accessed 4 July 2015.

97 Stakić, ‘Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse’, pp. 53, 59.

98 Wilkinson, Cai, ‘Putting “traditional values” into practice: the rise and contestation of anti-homopropaganda laws in Russia’, Journal of Human Rights, 13:3 (2014), pp. 366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 373

99 Barlovac, ‘Criticism of Serbia’s rights record upsets progressives’.

100 Duhaček, Gordan, ‘HDZ Treba Podržati Zakon o Životnom Partnerstvu’, tportal.hr (5 June 2014)Google Scholar, available at:{http://www.tportal.hr/vijesti/komentari/336403/HDZ-treba-podrzati-Zakon-o-zivotnom-partnerstvu.html} accessed 3 July 2015.

101 Kuhar, , ‘Use of the Europeanization frame’, p. 187 Google Scholar.

102 Schimmelfennig, , ‘Strategic calculation and international socialization’, pp. 836–838 Google Scholar.

103 Gay Straight Alliance, ‘Tadic: I still support Pride, but I paid an enormous political price because of it in 2010’, Gay Straight Alliance (12 February 2014), available at: {http://en.gsa.org.rs/2014/02/tadic-i-still-support-pride-but-i-paid-an-enormous-political-price-because-of-it-in-2010/} accessed 11 February 2015.

104 ‘Serbia bans Gay Pride parade citing violence fears’, BBC News (11 October 2011), available at: {http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/world-europe-15134182} accessed 11 February 2015.

105 Stakić, ‘Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse’, p. 60.

106 Examples of more recent scholarship include Subotić, ‘Europe is a state of mind’; Bukovansky et al., Special Responsibilities; Dryzek, Foundations and Frontiers; Ayoub, ‘Contested norms in new adopter states’.