Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T21:11:32.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaving Nuremberg: America’s love/hate relationship with international law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

LINDA S. BISHAI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The official US attitude towards the prosecution of crimes against humanity and war crimes changed dramatically from the universality of Nuremberg to the exceptionalism of the Rome Treaty negotiation. This article argues that the history of US legal thinking indicates that both stances are the result of a conceptual battle between legal realism and legal idealism – strains of international legal thought that pose a battle of opposites which is never fully resolved into a coherent approach. Although Nuremberg would seem to illustrate the idealist extreme and the abstention from Rome the realist one, in fact both stances were the culmination of intense negotiation and argumentation between the two strains of thought.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 425 - 443
Copyright
Copyright British International Studies Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)