Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:28:44.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International refugee protection and the primary institutions of international society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2020

Olivia Nantermoz Open the ORCID record for Olivia Nantermoz [Opens in a new window]
Olivia Nantermoz*
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Refugees are often considered as a source of disorder if not fundamental threat to international society. In contrast, and drawing from an English School approach, this article argues that the figure of the refugee is foundational to the constitution of both modern international society and its agent, the sovereign territorial state; hence refugee protection represents a primary institution of international society. Starting with conceptual and methodological considerations for studying primary institutions, the article then highlights the longstanding and widespread state practice of granting asylum. It is shown that on the one hand, the figure of the refugee serves to consolidate and naturalise the nation/state/territory trinity underpinning the modern state system; and on the other hand, protecting refugees plays a central role in the construction of statist self-identities as liberal, humanitarian, and altruistic agents. The last section of the article turns to the politics of contestation of refugee protection, examining domestic, regional, and international reactions to ‘anti-refugee’ policies in the United States, Hungary, and Australia. The considerable amount of criticism generated by these restrictive policies, it is argued, evidence the enduring importance and relevance of refugee protection in (and for) international society.

Keywords

English SchoolPrimary InstitutionsRefugeesInternational SocietyMigrationHumanitarianism
Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 256 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), ‘Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2018’, p. 4, available at: {https://www.unhcr.org/ https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf} accessed 16 January 2020.

2 Betts, Alexander and Loescher, Gil (eds), Refugees in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

3 Nyers, Peter, ‘Refugees, humanitarian emergencies, and the politicization of life’, Refuge, 17:6 (1998), pp. 16–21 (p. 16)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Cox, Robert, ‘Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond International Relations theory’, Millennium, 10:2 (1981), pp. 126–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Haddad, Emma, The Refugee in International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), p. 4Google Scholar; see also Andrew Hurrell, ‘Refugees, international society, and global order’, in Betts and Loescher (eds), Refugees in International Relations, pp. 85–104.

6 Falkner, Robert and Buzan, Barry, ‘The emergence of environmental stewardship as a primary institution of global international society’, European Journal of International Relations, 25:1 (2019), pp. 131–55 (p. 135)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Nyers, ‘Refugees, humanitarian emergencies, and the politicization of life’, p. 17.

8 Hurrell, Andrew, ‘Keeping history, law and political philosophy firmly within the English School’, Review of International Studies, 27:3 (2001), pp. 489–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (Columbia: Columbia University Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Hurrell, ‘Refugees, international society, and global order’, p. 93.

11 Vincent, Raymond John, ‘Political and economic refugees: Problems of migration, asylum and re-settlement’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 2:4 (1989), pp. 504–12 (p. 511)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Clark, Ian, The Vulnerable in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 87–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Suganami, Hidemi, ‘British institutionalists, or the English School, 20 years on’, International Relations, 17:3 (2003), pp. 253–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Buzan, Barry, ‘Not hanging separately: Responses to Dunne and Alder’, Millennium, 34:1 (2005), pp. 183–94 (p. 190)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Schouenborg, Laust, ‘A new institutionalism? The English School as international sociological theory’, International Relations, 25:1 (2011), pp. 26–44 (p. 27)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Clark, Ian, Hegemony in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Bull, The Anarchical Society, p. 74.

18 See notably Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holsti, Kalevi J., Taming the Sovereigns (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 21–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schouenborg, ‘A new institutionalism?’; Wilson, Peter, ‘The English School meets the Chicago School: The case for a grounded theory of international institutions’, International Studies Review, 14:4 (2012), pp. 567–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brütsch, Christian, ‘Technocratic manager, imperial agent, or diplomatic champion? The IMF in the anarchical society’, Review Of International Studies, 40:2 (2014), pp. 207–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spandler, Kilian, ‘The political international society: Change in primary and secondary institutions’, Review of International Studies, 41:3 (2015), pp. 601–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Costa-Buranelli, Filippo, ‘“Do you know what I mean?’ “Not exactly”: English School, global international society and the polysemy of institutions’, Global Discourse, 5:3 (2015), pp. 499–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Navari, Cornelia, ‘Primary and secondary institutions: Quo vadit?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51:1 (2016), pp. 121–7Google Scholar; Knudsen, Tonny Brems, ‘Solidarism, pluralism and fundamental institutional change’, Cooperation and Conflict, 51:1 (2016), pp. 102–09Google Scholar; Parrat, Charlotta Friedner, ‘On the evolution of primary institutions of international society’, International Studies Quarterly, 61:3 (2017), pp. 623–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Knudsen, Tonny Brems and Navari, Cornelia (eds), International Organization in the Anarchical Society (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to the English School of International Relations (Cambridge: Polity, 2014), p. 176Google Scholar.

20 Holsti, Taming the Sovereigns, pp. 21–2.

21 Schouenborg, ‘A new institutionalism?’.

22 Falkner and Buzan, ‘The emergence of environmental stewardship’.

23 Wilson, ‘The English School meets the Chicago School’, p. 568.

24 Wendt, Alexander, ‘Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics’, International Organization, 46:2 (1992), pp. 391–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 181.

26 Reus-Smit, Christian, The Politics of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 The separability between the actors (states) and international society is admittedly contestable. According to the logic of structuration, ‘there is a sense in which the state and the society of states are seen as co-constituted’; see Brown, Chris, ‘World society and the English School: An “international society” perspective on world society’, European Journal of International Relations, 7:4 (1995), pp. 423–41 (p. 434)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 178. That being said, the distinction between these two aspects of the idea of constitutive institutions remains useful for analytical purposes and will thus be maintained for this research.

28 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 181.

29 Tonny Brems Knudsen, ‘Fundamental institutions and international organizations: Theorizing continuity and change’, in Knudsen and Navari (eds), International Organization in the Anarchical Society, pp. 23–50 (pp. 38–40).

30 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 178.

31 Knudsen, ‘Fundamental institutions and international organizations’.

32 Spegele, Roger D., ‘Traditional political realism and the writing of history’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.), International Society and its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 97Google Scholar.

33 Linklater, Andrew and Suganami, Hidemi, The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Filippo Costa Buranelli, ‘Explaining the Yolks: Process-tracing and the Formation of Regional International Societies’, Working Paper (2015), p. 1. Discussions about English School methodology have, however, been reignited in more recent years; see notably Navari, Cornelia (ed.), Theorising International Society: English School Methods (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Buzan, An Introduction to the English School of International Relations.

35 Falkner and Buzan, ‘The emergence of environmental stewardship’.

36 Ibid., pp. 135–6.

37 Weber, Max, The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press, 1949), p. 81Google Scholar.

38 See, for example, Navari (ed.), Theorising International Society, p. 14; Linklater and Suganami, The English School of International Relations, p. 103; Edward Keene, ‘International society as an ideal type’, in Navari (ed.), Theorising International Society.

39 Buzan, An Introduction to the English School of International Relations, p. 20.

40 Keene, ‘International society as an ideal type’, p. 107.

41 Ibid., p. 110.

42 This needs not result in pure subjectivism, that is, in the affirmation that there is no material or objective reality. Norms and practices are ‘in some sense, out there, as epistemically objective patterns of actions that confront agents as external realities with which to grapple’. Primary institutions, in contrast, follow a different logic, that of abstraction, thus their aim is ‘not to match actual social instances, but to draw useful connections between them’: Pouliot, Vincent, ‘Practice tracing’, in Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey T. (eds), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 237–59 (pp. 238–9)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Jackson, Patrick T., The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics (New York: Routledge, 2011), p. 115Google Scholar.

44 Falkner and Buzan, ‘The emergence of environmental stewardship’, p. 145.

45 Wilson, ‘The English School meets the Chicago School’.

46 Knudsen, ‘Fundamental institutions and international organizations’.

47 Crepeau, François, Droit D'asile (Brussels: Bruylant, 1995), p. 29Google Scholar.

48 UNHCR, ‘Protecting Refugees and the Role of UNHCR’ (2014), p. 3, available at: {https://www.unhcr.org/509a836e9.pdf} accessed 12 October 2019.

49 Gil-Bazo, Maria-Teresa, ‘Asylum as a general principle of international law’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 27:1 (2015), pp. 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In Ancient Greece, the duties of xenia – hospitality, or ‘guest-friendship’ – extended to those in exile or fleeing persecution, providing an equivalent to the principle of asylum: Isayev, Elena, ‘Between hospitality and asylum: A historical perspective on displaced agency’, International Review of the Red Cross, 99:904 (2017), pp. 75–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society.

51 Boswell, Christina, The Ethics of Refugee Policy (Burlington: Ashgate, 2005), p. 23Google Scholar.

52 Marrus, Michael Robert, The Unwanted: European Refugees In The Twentieth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

53 Ibid., p. 7.

54 Soguk, Nevzat, States and Strangers (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), p. 116Google Scholar. For an excellent analysis of how the international refugee regime centres on ‘the refugee (as) problem’, that is, the problems that refugees pose, as opposed to the problems which refugees face, see Saunders, Natasha, International Political Theory and the Refugee Problem (London: Routledge 2018)Google Scholar. The third section will further expand on this point.

55 Agamben, Giorgio, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000), pp. 20–1Google Scholar.

56 Loescher, Gilburt, Refugee Movements And International Security (Oxford: Brassey's, 1992), pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

57 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 114.

58 League of Nations, ‘Records of the Seventh Ordinary Session of the Assembly: Text of the Debates, Official Journal’, special supplement, 44 (1926), pp. 86–139 (p. 113).

59 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 203.

60 Loescher, Gil, Beyond Charity: International Cooperation And The Global Refugee Crisis (Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 37Google Scholar.

61 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 120.

62 See, for example, Alexander Betts and James Milner, ‘Governance of the Global Refugee Regime’, World Refugee Council Research Paper No. 13 (2019); Aleinikoff, Alexander T. and Zamore, Leah, The Arc of Protection: Toward a New International Refugee Regime (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 The 1951 Convention defines a refugee as any person who, ‘owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or … unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country’ (Article 1(A)).

64 Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984)Google Scholar.

65 UN Treaties, ‘Status of Treaties – Convention relating to the Status of Refugees’, available at: {https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsII.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=V-2&chapter=5&Temp=mtdsg2&clang=_en} accessed 20 April 2019.

66 Goodwin-Gill, Guy S. and McAdam, Jane, The Refugee in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), p. 365Google Scholar; Gil-Bazo, ‘Asylum as a general principle of international law’, p. 533.

67 Allain, Jean, ‘The jus cogens nature of non-refoulement’, International Journal of Refugee Law, 13:4 (2001), pp. 553–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Provided by Article 33 of the 1951 Convention, the principle of non-refoulement forbids the return of individuals to a territory where their life or liberty would be in jeopardy, or where they would be in risk of persecution.

68 Gil-Bazo, ‘Asylum as a general principle of international law’.

69 See, for instance, the Global Compact on Refugees adopted in 2018: ‘[i]t is recognized that a number of States not parties to the international refugee instruments have shown a generous approach to hosting refugees.’ General Assembly, ‘Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees – Global Compact on Refugees’, A 73/12 (New York, 2018), p. 2, available at: {https://www.unhcr.org/gcr/GCR_English.pdf} accessed 12 October 2019.

70 UNHCR, ‘UNHCR Global Report 2018’ (2019), p. 103, available at: {http://reporting.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/gr2018/pdf/05_Asia.pdf} accessed 12 October 2019.

71 UNHCR, ‘Bullet Point Summary of the Strategic Presentation on UNHCR's Operations in Asia and the Pacific’, 26th Meeting of Standing Committee (2003), available at: {http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/search?page=search&docid=3e638a794&query=%2246%20March%202003%22} accessed 15 April 2019.

72 United Nations in Mongolia, ‘United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)’ (n.d.), available at: {https://www.undp.org/content/unct/mongolia/en/home/agencies/united-nations-high-commissioner-for-refugees--unhcr-.html} accessed 3 October 2019. Another example is Pakistan: whereas not a party to international refugee protection instruments, the government has registered as refugees close to 900,000 undocumented Afghans in 2018. UNHCR, ‘UNHCR Global Report 2018’, p. 108.

73 Prabandari, Atin and Adiputera, Yunizar, ‘Alternative paths to refugee and asylum seeker protection in Malaysia and Indonesia’, Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 28:2 (2019), pp. 132–54 (p. 134)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 Ibid., p. 146.

75 Arnaout, Ghassan M., L'asile dans la tradition Arobo-Islamique (Genève, 1986)Google Scholar; Musab Hayatli, ‘Islam, international law and the protection of refugees and IDPs’, Forced Migration Review (June 2012), p. 2.

76 See UNHCR, ‘UNHCR Global Report 2018’, p. 142.

77 I am thankful to a peer reviewer for highlighting this point; see also Falkner and Buzan, ‘The emergence of environmental stewardship’, p. 133.

78 Earth Reminder, ‘World Refugee Day – History, Themes and Quotes’ (2019), available at: {https://www.earthreminder.com/world-refugee-day/} accessed 12 October 2019.

79 UN, ‘World Refugee Day 20 June’ (n.d.), available at: {https://www.un.org/en/events/refugeeday/}.

80 UNHCR, ‘Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework’ (n.d.), available at: {https://www.unhcr.org/comprehensive-refugee-response-framework-crrf.html} accessed 12 October 2019.

81 UNHCR, ‘New York Declaration for Refugees and Migrants’ (n.d.), available at: {https://www.unhcr.org/new-york-declaration-for-refugees-and-migrants.html} accessed 12 October 2019.

82 van Garderen, Jacob and Ebenstein, Julie, ‘Regional developments: Africa’, in Zimmermann, Andreas et al. (eds), The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 185–204Google Scholar.

83 African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, ‘Ratification Table: AU Convention Governing Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa’, available at: {http://www.achpr.org/instruments/refugee-convention/ratification/} accessed 15 April 2019; Hofmann, Rainer, ‘Refugee law in Africa’, Law and State, 39 (1989), pp. 318–33Google Scholar.

84 Flavia Piovesan and Liliana L. Jubilat, ‘Regional developments: Americas’, in Zimmermann et al. (eds), The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, pp. 205–24 (p. 224).

85 Council of the European Union, Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001, OJ L 212, 7 August 2001, p. 12; Council Directive 2003/9/EC, OJ L 31, 6 February 2003, p. 18; Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004, OJ L 304, 30 September 2004, p. 12; Council Directive 2005/85/EC, OJL 326, 13 December 2005, p. 13.

86 Noll, Gregor, ‘Risky games? A theoretical approach to burden-sharing in the asylum field’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 16:3 (2003), pp. 236–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Eiko Thielemann, ‘Towards Refugee Burden-Sharing in the European Union: State Interests and Policy Options’, Union Studies Association Ninth Biennial International Conference (2005).

87 Gil-Bazo, ‘Asylum as a general principle of international law’.

88 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 13. For examples of such ‘conventional approaches’, see Holborn, Louise W., Refugees, A Problem Of Our Time: The Work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 1951–1972 (Metuchen: Scarecrow Press, 1975)Google Scholar; Marrus, The Unwanted; Loescher, Gil, The UNHCR and World Politics: A Perilous Path (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Betts and Loescher (eds), Refugees in International Relations.

89 Foucault, Michel, ‘Why the prison?’, in Burchell, Graham et al. (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality; With Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991), p. 84Google Scholar.

90 Foucault, Michel, ‘Practicing criticism’, in Kritzman, Lawrence D. (ed.), Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews (New York: Routledge, 1988), p. 154Google Scholar.

91 Soguk, States and Strangers; Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 1.

92 Zolberg, Aristide R., ‘The formation of new states as a refugee-generating process’, The Annals of the American Academy of Political And Social Science, 467:1 (1983), pp. 24–38 (p. 31)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 9.

93 Malkki, Liisa H., Purity and Exile (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), p. 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Ashley, Richard K., ‘Untying the sovereign state: A double reading of the anarchy problematique’, Millennium, 17:2 (1988), p. 230Google Scholar; Walker, R. B. J., Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar.

95 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 48.

96 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 178.

97 UNHCR, ‘Statement by Mrs. Sadako Ogata, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, at the Roundtable Discussion on United Nations Human Rights Protection of Internally Displaced Persons’, Nyon, Switzerland (1993), available at: {http://www.unhcr.org/afr/admin/hcspeeches/3ae68fad4/statement-mrs-sadako-ogata-united-nations-high-commissioner-refugees-roundtable.html} accessed 10 February 2020.

98 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 90.

99 Ibid., p. 60.

100 Ibid., p. 58.

101 Ibid., p. 256; Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 178.

102 Ibid., p. 244.

103 Campbell, David, Writing Security (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1998), p. 17Google Scholar.

104 Khosravi, Shahram, ‘The “illegal” traveller: An auto-ethnography of borders’, Social Anthropology, 15:3 (2008), pp. 321–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

105 Kristeva, Julia, Strangers to Ourselves (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 81Google Scholar.

106 Such processes of ‘othering’ have historically taken many different forms, and have thus not manifested solely through the figure of the refugee. Other types of foreigners, the uncivilised or savage (during the period of colonisation) and the deviant or criminal, have similarly represented important ‘others’ for nation-building. Still, this should not lead to underappreciate the importance of the refugee figure, who remains a pervasive and oft-discussed topic in both domestic and international politics.

107 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 56.

108 Statt, Daniel, Foreigners and Englishmen (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1995), pp. 186–7Google Scholar.

109 Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976)Google Scholar.

110 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 58.

111 Honig, Bonnie, Democracy and the Foreigner (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

112 Maria Fotou, ‘Ethics of Hospitality: Envisaging the Stranger in the Contemporary World’ (PhD dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2016), p. 72.

113 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 100; Ashley, Richard, ‘Imposing international purpose: Notes on a problematic of governance’, in Cziempiel, Ersnt-Otto and Rosenau, James N. (eds), Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges (Lexington, NY: Lexington Books, 1989)Google Scholar.

114 Haddad, The Refugee in International Society, p. 219.

115 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 255.

116 Ibid., p. 100.

117 Wendt, ‘Anarchy is what states make of it’, p. 416.

118 Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty’, Review of International Studies, 27:4 (2001), p. 520CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

119 Gil-Bazo, ‘Asylum as a general principle of international law’, p. 24.

120 Buzan, From International to World Society?, p. 132.

121 Gil-Bazo, ‘Asylum as a general principle of international law’, p. 28.

122 Ibid., p. 25.

123 Weiler, Joseph, The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor?’And Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

124 Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization, 52:4 (1998), pp. 887–917 (p. 904)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

125 Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126 McCluskey, Emma, From Righteousness to Far Right: An Anthropological Rethinking of Critical Security Studies (Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press), p. 20Google Scholar.

127 Ibid., pp. 7–8.

128 Alvina Hoffmann, ‘Review – From Righteousness to Far Right’, e-ir (2019), available at: {https://www.e-ir.info/2019/08/29/review-from-righteousness-to-far-right/} accessed 29 September 2019.

129 Pallister-Wilkins, Polly, ‘The humanitarian politics of European Border Policing: Frontex and border police in Evros’, International Political Sociology, 9:1 (2015), pp. 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

130 Korsgaard, Christine M., Self-Constitution (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

131 Radice, Henry, ‘Saving ourselves? On rescue and humanitarian action’, Review of International Studies, 45:3 (2019), pp. 1–18 (p. 10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

132 Ministère de l'Intérieur, ‘Présentation à l'Assemblée nationale du projet de loi sur le droit d'asile’ (2014), available at: {https://www.interieur.gouv.fr/fr/Archives/Archives-ministre-de-l-interieur/Archives-Bernard-Cazeneuve-avril-2014-decembre-2016/Interventions-du-ministre/Presentation-a-l-Assemblee-nationale-du-projet-de-loi-sur-le-droit-d-asile} accessed 12 April 2019.

133 Kim Willsher and Stephanie Kirchgaessner, ‘Germany and France demand binding refugee quotas for EU members’, The Guardian (3 September 2015), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/03/germany-france-eu-refugee-quotas-migration-crisis} accessed 20 April 2019.

134 Thielemann, Eiko, ‘Between interests and norms: Explaining burden-sharing in the European Union’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 16:3 (2003), pp. 253–73 (p. 270)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

135 Joppke, Christian, Immigration and the Nation-State (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

136 Thibaut Madelin, ‘Réfugiés: Merkel appelle les Européens au devoir de dignité’, Les Echos (2015), available at: {https://www.lesechos.fr/31/08/2015/lesechos.fr/021292498851_refugies---merkel-appelle-les-europeens-au-devoir-de-dignite.htm#sf0RsHVSL5FVfZcI.99} accessed 16 April 2019.

137 Mavelli, Luca, ‘Governing populations through the humanitarian government of refugees: Biopolitical care and racism in the European refugee crisis’, Review of International Studies, 43:5 (2017), pp. 809–32 (p. 811)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

138 Patrick Wintor, ‘UK to take up to 20,000 Syrian refugees over five years, David Cameron confirms’, The Guardian (2015), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/07/uk-will-accept-up-to-20000-syrian-refugees-david-cameron-confirms} accessed 12 April 2019.

139 Mavelli, ‘Governing populations’, p. 812.

140 Gibney, Matthew J., The Ethics and Politics of Asylum (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

141 Ahlborn, Christiane, ‘Normative erosion of international refugee protection: Back to state security’, in The Development of International Refugee Protection through the Practice of the UN Security Council (Geneva: Graduate Institute Publications, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hurrell, ‘Refugees, international society, and global order’, pp. 94–5.

142 Buzan, From International to World Society?; Buzan, An Introduction to the English School of International Relations.

143 Costa Buranelli, ‘Explaining the Yolks’.

144 Peter Wilson, ‘The English School's approach to international law’, in Navari (ed.), Theorising International Society, pp. 167–88 (p. 168).

145 Communiqué to the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, ‘The Situation in Nauru and Manus Island: Liability for Crimes against Humanity in the Detention of Refugees and Asylum Seekers’ (2017), available at: {https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/b743d9_e4413cb72e1646d8bd3e8a8c9a466950.pdf} accessed 27 September 2019.

146 Human Rights Watch, ‘Australia: Reverse Cruel Refugee Policy’ (2019), available at: {https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/01/17/australia-reverse-cruel-refugee-policy} accessed 27 September 2019

147 Ben Doherty, ‘UN body condemns Australia for illegal detention of asylum seekers and refugees’, The Guardian (2019), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jul/08/un-body-condemns-australia-for-illegal-detention-of-asylum-seekers-and-refugees} accessed 30 September 2019.

148 Ben Doherty, ‘The United Nations reiterates demand for Australia to close “dire” detention centres’, The Guardian (2019), available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/13/united-nations-reiterates-demand-for-australia-to-close-dire-detention-centres} accessed 30 September 2019.

149 European Commission, ‘Commission takes Hungary to Court for Criminalizing Activities in Support of Asylum Seekers and Opens New Infringement for Non-Provision of Food in Transit Zones’ (2019), available at: {https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-19-4260_en.htm} accessed 26 September 2019.

150 Krsna Avila et al., ‘The Rise of Sanctuary’, ILRC (2018), p. 1, available at: {https://www.ilrc.org/rise-sanctuary} accessed 30 September 2019.

151 ‘Half of all Americans now live in “sanctuaries” protecting immigrants’, The Washington Times, available at: {https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/10/half-of-americans-now-live-in-sanctuaries/} accessed 27 September 2019

152 Avila et al., ‘The Rise of Sanctuary’, p. 1.

153 Ibid., p. 29.

154 Jeremy Diamond and Euan McKirdy, ‘Judge issues blow against Trump's sanctuary city order’, CNN (2017), available at: {https://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/21/politics/trump-sanctuary-cities-executive-order-blocked/index.html} accessed 27 September 2019.

155 ‘Civil Rights Challenges To Trump Refugee/Visa Order’, University of Michigan Law School, available at: {https://www.clearinghouse.net/results.php?searchSpecialCollection=44} accessed 30 September 2019.

156 Jennifer Rubin, ‘Most Americans have rejected Trump's xenophobia’, The Washington Post (2019), available at: {https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/08/12/americans-have-rejected-trumps-xenophobia-mostly/} accessed 4 October 2019.

157 Soguk, States and Strangers, p. 50; Agamben, Homo Sacer.