Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:37:09.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Inter. Pol. by Post” or international relations and foreign policy from the Open University1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Roger Carey
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer in International Relations Department of Politics and History, Lanchester Polytechnic

Extract

When Philip Reynolds opened the first issue of the British Journal of International Studies with an examination of the “state of the art” in Great Britain,2 he omitted any mention of the Open University as a source of such studies. In the sense that Reynolds was seeking establishments with full-time students of International Studies, the omission was justified; in the sense that the Open University forms a seat of learning whose students are concerned with the study of International Relations, it was not. Indeed, it is possible that the Open University may have, at any one time, more students reading International Relations than any other single institution in the United Kingdom. These several hundreds of part-time students, pursuing the single course under review, are distributed rather unevenly across the face of Great Britain. They have varying access to library facilities; the greatly varying environment of their own homes in which to work; greatly varying amounts of contact with their tutors, either on a “face-to-face” basis or by letter or telephone. In short, the student for whom this course is designed is different – he represents, perhaps, the “new actor” in academic life in Great Britain. He is ignored at our – the traditional academics, – peril, for whilst we may be concerned with standards of academic excellence there are many in high places who now judge success by such criteria as staff-student ratios, cost effectiveness, and the like.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 186 note 2. Reynolds, P. A., ‘International Studies: retrospect and prospect’, British Journal of International Studies, i (1975), pp. 120CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

page 187 note 1. Barber, J. P. and Smith, M. H. (eds.), ‘The Nature of Foreign Policy: A Reader (Holmes McDougall/The Open University Press, 1974)Google Scholar.

Burton, J. W., World Society (London, 1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

Frankel, J., Contemporary International Theory and the Behaviour of States (London, 1973)Google Scholar.

Holsti, K. J., International Politics: a Framework for analysis (New York, 1973)Google Scholar.

Northedge, F. S., Descent from Power: British Foreign Policy 1945–1973 (London, 1974)Google Scholar.

Waltz, K. H., Man, the State, and War (New York, 1965)Google Scholar.

page 187 note 2. Barber and Smith op. cit.

page 188 note 1. Supplementary Material for Block 1, p. 1.

page 188 note 2. Block 1, p. 7.

page 189 note 1. Block 5, p. 7.

page 189 note 2. Block 1, p. 27.

page 190 note 1. A Guide to the Course, p. 6.

page 191 note 1. Block 5, p. 72.

page 192 note 1. Barber and Smith, op. cit.

page 194 note 1. Whole credit courses rate for 16 TV programmes and 32 radio programmes, while half-credit courses rate for 8 TV programmes and only 16 radio programmes.