Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:57:31.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Human rights as settled norms: Mervyn Frost and the limits of Hegelian human rights theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

Abstract

This article explores the normative international relations theory of Mervyn Frost. Frost's unorthodox approach to questions of human rights offers a way through the political and philosophical morass that has often threatened to obscure the most pressing issues of our time. Significantly, Frost claims to able to ‘construct’ a background justification for international ethics that can unite the demands for sovereign autonomy with declarations of human rights. In doing so Frost attempts to offer an new understanding of universal ethics and thus of the role of human rights in international politics. Acknowledging the importance of this approach, this article examines two issues that arise from Frost's ‘constitutive theory’ and seeks to offer a signpost for the future development of human rights theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 British International Studies Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)