Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:19:55.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American empire – a dangerous distortion?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2010

ANDREW BAKER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews the idea of ‘American Empire’. For most of the Cold War, this term formed part of particular kind of Marxian critique of American power. Neither American nor European statesmen, nor the mainstream press, regarded America as an ‘empire’. Interestingly, the idea of an ‘American Empire’, stripped of its Marxian connotations, entered the mainstream towards the end of Cold War. This article asks two questions: what does it mean? Is it a useful expression or a dangerous distortion? It will be argued that, as a general statement of American political economy, ‘American Empire’ is meaningless: it neither lends itself to positive comparison with European empires nor describes any concrete aspect of the international relations of the US. However, it is possible to refer to American empires limited in time and space, for instance to formal empire in the Philippines or informal empire in Iran. ‘American Empire’ is thus a distortion; but is it dangerous? The idea certainly captured the neoconservative imagination, but it does not seem to have had real policy implications.

Type
Online Only Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. e1 - e11
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Imperialism or Indifference?’ The Economist, 152:5413 (24 May 1947), p. 785.

2 Onuf, Peter S., Jefferson's Empire: The Language of American Nationhood (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2000)Google Scholar.

3 Low, D. A., ‘The Contraction of England; an inaugural lecture’, in D. A. Low, Eclipse of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 3 Google Scholar.

4 Metcalf, Thomas & Metcalf, Barbara, A Concise History of India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 95 Google Scholar & 220.

5 Doyle, Michael W., Empires (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 33 Google Scholar.

6 Beloff, Max, Imperial Sunset, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1969 & 1989)Google Scholar.

7 Porter, Bernard, The Absent-Minded Imperialists: Empire, Society and Culture in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

8 Robinson, Ronald, ‘Non-European foundations of European imperialism: Sketch for a theory of collaboration’, in Roger Owen and Bob Sutcliffe (eds), Studies in the Theory of Imperialism (London: Longman, 1972), pp. 118–119 Google Scholar.

9 Darwin, John, After Tamerlane: The Global History of Empire since 1405 (London: Allen Lane, 2007), p. 23 Google Scholar.

10 Harry Truman, radio report on the Potsdam Conference, 9 August 1945. Truman, Harry S., Public Papers: 12 April to 31 December, 1945 (Washington, D.C.: US GPO, 1961), p. 203 Google Scholar.

11 Lake, David, Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999), p. 41 Google Scholar.

12 Lukes, Steven, Power: A Radical View, 2nd edn (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Spear, Percival, The Nabobs: A study of the social life of the English in eighteenth century India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

14 Gladwyn, Lord, The Memoirs of Lord Gladwyn (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1972), p. 117 Google Scholar.

15 R. M. MacDonnell, Ottawa, to Jack Hickerson, 19 October 1945. Documents on Canadian External Relations, vol. 11, ‘1945’ (Ottawa: The Queen's Printer), pp. 1499–500.

16 Mansergh, Nicholas, Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs: Problems of Wartime Cooperation and Post-war Change, 1939–1952 (London: Oxford University Press, 1958), pp. 339–342 Google Scholar.

17 Quoted by Bullock, Alan, Ernest Bevin: Foreign Secretary, 1945–1951 (London: Heinemann, 1983), p. 671 Google Scholar.

18 Unsere Mauern brechen; unsere Herzen nicht: fitting epitaph to the Allied bombing of Germany.

19 Omissi, David, Air Power and Colonial Control: The Royal Air Force, 1919–1939 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990), pp. 18–38 Google Scholar; on ‘no-fly zones’ see Graham-Brown, Sarah, Sanctioning Saddam: The Politics of Intervention in Iraq (London: I.B. Tauris, 1999), pp. 107–121 Google Scholar.

20 Bill, James A., The Eagle and the Lion: The Tragedy of American-Iranian Relations (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), pp. 216–260 Google Scholar.

21 Nye, Joseph, Soft Power: The means to success in world politics (New York: Public Affairs, 2004), pp. 5–18 Google Scholar.

22 Gardner, Richard, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective: The Origins and Prospects of our International Economic Order, rev. edn. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989),pp. 286–385 Google Scholar. Also see the overview in Milward, Alan, ‘Was the Marshall Plan Necessary?’, Diplomatic History, 13:2 (Spring 1989), pp. 231–253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Manes, David R. and Aravena, Francisco Rojas, The US and Chile: Coming in from the Cold (New York: Routledge, 2001), pp. 10–15 Google Scholar.

24 Schlesinger, Stephen and Kinzer, Stephen, Bitter Fruit: The Story of the American Coup in Guatemala (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999), pp. 227–266 Google Scholar.

25 Stiglitz, Joseph, Globalization and its Discontents (London: Allen Lane, 2002), pp. 198–213 Google Scholar.

26 Kohsaka, Akira, ‘New Development Strategies: Beyond the Washington Consensus’, in Akira Kohsaka (ed.), New Development Strategies: Beyond the Washington Consensus (London: Palgrave, 2004), pp. 1–2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Gilpin, Robert, The Challenge of Global Capitalism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 120–124 Google Scholar. Some form of coercion would be necessary to satisfy the charge ‘dollar imperialism’; sometimes commentators hint this might become the case, but there is as yet no proof for the charge.

28 In which connection, see Jackson, Robert, Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

29 As Michael Mann writes, ‘it is not so much the material resources which are lacking as the supportive ideologies to deploy them.’ Mann, Michael, ‘The first failed empire of the 21st century’, Review of International Studies, 30:4 (October 2004), p. 637 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Lest the Vietnam War be considered lengthy, the Anglo-Maratha Wars ran 1777–1818, and the Maori Wars 1845–1872. Also, the British won – something of a sine qua non of empire-building.

31 Gaddis, J. L., ‘Containment: Its Past and Future’, International Security, 5:4 (Spring 1981), p. 79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Gaddis, J. L., ‘The Emerging Post-Revisionist Synthesis on the Origins of the Cold War’, Diplomatic History, 7:3 (Summer 1983), p. 182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Wolton, Suke, Lord Hailey, the Colonial Office and the Politics of Race and Empire in the Second World War: The Loss of White Prestige (London: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 35–64 Google Scholar; also Rich, Paul B., Race and Empire in British Politics, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

34 Lundestad, Geir, ‘Empire by Invitation? The US and Western Europe, 1945–1952’, Journal of Peace Research, 23:3 (September 1986), pp. 263–277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Lundestad, Geir, The American ‘Empire’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), pp. 37–39 Google Scholar.

36 Gaddis, J. L., The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 59nGoogle Scholar.

37 John Barry, ‘Is it Twilight for America?’, Newsweek (25 January 1988), p. 21.

38 Gray, Paul, ‘Why All Empires Come to Dust’, Time (15 February 1988), p. 56 Google Scholar.

39 Mead, Walter Russell, Mortal Splendor: The American Empire in Transition (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987)Google Scholar.

40 Kagan, Robert, Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (London: Atlantic, 2003)Google Scholar.

41 Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987)Google Scholar.

42 Snyder, Jack, Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

43 Gaddis, J. L., We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), esp. pp. 26–53 Google Scholar.

44 Gaddis, J. L., ‘A Grand Strategy of Transformation’, Foreign Affairs, 113 (Nov–Dec 2002), pp. 50–57 Google Scholar.

45 Gaddis, J. L., Surprise, Security, and the American Experience (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004), pp. 107–113 Google Scholar.

46 Lundestad, Geir, ‘Empire’ by integration: The US and European integration, 1945–1997 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar. As in his ‘empire by invitation’ thesis, Lundestad seems torn between the desire to compare America to leading great powers and empires of the past, and the admission that America's ‘empire’, as such, fits but loosely (if at all) any such definition. This tension is particularly evident in the empire by integration thesis, since the only evidence Lundestad can adduce for ‘empire’ is that American ‘support’ for European integration (talk about a post-modern emperor!) was somewhat self-interested. This is why I classify it as part of the ‘empire of liberty’ school.

47 Aron, Raymond, République Impériale: Les États-Unis dans le monde, 1945–1972 (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1973), p. 283 Google Scholar.

48 Bain, William, Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Ferguson, Niall, ‘The empire that dare not speak its name’, The Sunday Times (13 April 2003), p. 3 Google Scholar.

50 Boot, Max, ‘The Case for American Empire’, The Weekly Standard, 7:5 (15 October 2001), p. 27 Google Scholar.

51 Kaplan, Robert, Warrior Politics: Why Leadership demands a Pagan Ethos (New York: Random House, 2002)Google Scholar.

52 Krauthammer, Charles, ‘In Defense of Democratic Realism’, The National Interest, 77 (Fall 2004), pp. 15–25 Google Scholar.

53 For instance, Bookman, Jay, ‘The President's real goal in Iraq’, in Michael C. Sifry and Christopher Cerf (eds), The Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2003), pp. 347–352 Google Scholar. More generally, see Todd, Emmanuel, After the Empire: The Breakdown of the American Order, trans. C. Jon Delogu (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

54 See the thoughtful essays in Thomas Cushman (ed.), A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for War in Iraq (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005).

55 This statement borrows heavily from Tucker, Robert, Nation or Empire? The Debate over American Foreign Policy (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968)Google ScholarPubMed. Also see Ikenberry, G. John, ‘America's Imperial Ambition’, Foreign Affairs, 81:5 (September–October 2002), pp. 44–60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 There is an expanding library on this topic. See, for instance, Chandrasekaran, Rajiv, Imperial life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's green zone (New York: Alfred Knopf, 2006)Google Scholar; Diamond, Larry, Squandered Victory: The American Occupation and the Bungled Effort to bring Democracy to Iraq (New York: Times Books, 2005)Google Scholar.

57 Ajami, Fouad, The Foreigner's Gift: The Americans, the Arabs and the Iraqis in Iraq (New York: Free Press, 2006), p. 85 Google Scholar.

58 Woodward, Bob, State of Denial (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006), pp. 97–177 Google Scholar; Strachan, Hew, ‘The Lost Meaning of Strategy’, Survival, 47:3 (Autumn 2005), pp. 33–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Strachan, Hew, ‘Making Strategy: Civil-Military Relations after Iraq’, Survival, 48:3 (Autumn 2006), pp. 59–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 ‘The National Security Strategy of the US of America’, September 2002. Available at: {http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html}. Also see, Kristol, William & Kagan, Robert, ‘Towards a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy’, Foreign Affairs, 75:4 (July–August, 1996), pp. 18–32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. More generally, see Mann, James, Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet (London: Penguin, 2004)Google Scholar.

60 Ferguson, Niall, Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire (London: Allen Lane, 2004), pp. 12–13 Google Scholar.