Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:11:25.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards a new societal security dilemma: comprehensive analysis of actor responsibility in intersocietal conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2012

ALI BILGIC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars of the societal security dilemma implicitly or explicitly aim to analyse actor responsibility in intersocietal group confrontations. However, adherence of these approaches to (neo-)realist theoretical assumptions of the security dilemma hinders this objective. This article provides analytical principles upon which a new societal security dilemma can be constructed in order to conduct a more comprehensive analysis of actor responsibility. A new societal security dilemma framework can be built upon three principles: (1) a security dilemma results in violence depending on how the actors themselves interpret the political structure in which they interact with others; (2) differentiation of actors' intentions as malign or benign is inconsequential; what matters is how actors interpret security and which tools they choose to adopt to achieve security; and (3) identity is not exogenous to the politics of security. Adopting these principles requires reconceptualisation of the security dilemma. It will be argued that a new societal security, which reflects the politics of security, can provide a more comprehensive, dynamic, political, and realistic analysis of actor responsibility in societal-level confrontations. These new principles will be illustrated through re-reading of the dissolution of Yugoslavia to analyse actor responsibility as a sketch of the new societal security dilemma theorising.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 185 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Posen, Barry, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, Survival, 35:1 (1993), pp. 27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kaufman, Stuart, ‘An International Theory of Inter-Ethnic War’, Review of International Studies, 22 (1996), pp. 149–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Melander, Erik, Anarchy Within: The Security Dilemma Between Ethnic Groups in Emerging Anarchy (Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1999)Google Scholar; Roe, Paul, Societal Security Dilemma (London: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar.

2 Booth, Ken and Wheeler, Nicholas J., The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation, and Trust in World Politics (Hampshire: Palgrave and Macmillan, 2008)Google Scholar.

3 Job, Brain, The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1992)Google Scholar; Sorensen, Georg, ‘After the Security Dilemma: The Challenges of Insecurity in Weak States and the Dilemma of Liberal Values’, Security Dialogue, 38:3 (2007), pp. 357–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Collins, Alan, The Security Dilemma and the End of the Cold War (Edinburgh: Keele University Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Glaser, Charles L., ‘The Security Dilemma Revisited’, World Politics, 50:1 (1997), pp. 171–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Montgomery, Evan Braden, ‘Breaking out of the Security Dilemma: Realism, Reassurance and the Problem of Uncertainty’, International Security, 31:2 (2006), pp. 151–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Harvey, Frank P., ‘The Homeland Security Dilemma: Imagination, Failure, and the Escalating Costs Perfecting Security’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 40:2 (2007), pp. 283–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lindley, Dan, ‘Historical, Tactical, and Strategic Lessons from the Partition of Cyprus’, International Studies Perspectives, 8:2 (2007), pp. 224–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; J. J. Suh, Producing Security Dilemma out of Uncertainty: The North Korea Nuclear Crisis, Mario Einauidi Center for International Studies Working Paper Series, No. 8–06 (2006).

6 Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’; Kaufman, ‘An International Theory of Inter-Ethnic Conflict’; Massari, Nizar, ‘The State and Dilemmas of Security’, Security Dialogue, 33 (2002), pp. 415–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rose, William, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict: Some New Hypothesis’, Security Studies, 9:4 (2000), pp. 1–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roe, Societal Security Dilemma; Kirwin, Matthew, ‘The Security Dilemma and Conflict in Cote d'Ivore’, Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15:1 (2006), pp. 42–52Google Scholar; Nalbandov, Robert, ‘Living with Security Dilemmas: Triggers of Ethnic Conflicts the Case of Georgia’, Transcience Journal, 1:1 (2010), pp. 41–52Google Scholar.

7 Mitzen, Jennifer, ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12:3 (2006), pp. 341–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Such as Roe, Societal Security Dilemma.

9 Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’.

10 Ibid., p. 31.

11 Kaufmann, Chaim, ‘Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars’, International Security, 20:4 (1996), p. 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Ibid.

13 Ibid., p. 151.

14 Melander, Anarchy Within.

15 Roe, Paul, ‘The Interstate Security Dilemma: Ethnic Conflict as a “Tragedy”?’, Journal of Peace Research, 36:2 (1999), pp. 183–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Roe, Societal Security Dilemma.

16 Wæver, Ole, ‘Societal Security: the Concept’, in Wæver, Ole, Buzan, Barry, Kelstrup, Morten, and Lemaitre, Pierre (eds), Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe (London: St. Martins Press, 1993), p. 23Google Scholar.

17 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, p. 39, emphasis in original.

18 Tang, Shiping, ‘The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis’, Security Studies, 18:3 (2009), pp. 587–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tang, Shiping, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict: toward a dynamic and integrative theory of ethnic conflict’, Review of International Studies, 37:2 (2010), pp. 511–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Tang, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, p. 5.

20 Tang, ‘The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis’, p. 597.

21 Herz, John H., ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics, 2 (1950), p. 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar, emphasis added.

22 Posen, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, p. 29.

23 See also Kauffman, ‘Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars’, p. 147.

24 Kaufman, ‘An International Theory of Inter-Ethnic Conflict’, p. 158.

25 Steve Smith, ‘Mature Anarchy, Strong States and Security’, Arms Control, c2 (1991), pp. 325–39.

26 Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, ‘Governing Anarchy: A Research Agenda for the Study of Security Communities’, Ethics and International Affairs, 10 (1996), pp. 63–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Butterfield, Herbert, History and Human Relations (London: Collins, 1951), pp. 19–21Google Scholar.

29 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, pp. 96–106.

30 Ibid., p. 55.

31 Tang, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, pp. 16–17.

32 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, p. 101.

33 Tang, ‘The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict’, p. 17.

34 Wæver, Ole, ‘Securitization and Desecuritization’, in Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (ed.), On Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), pp. 46–86Google Scholar; Buzan, Barry, Wæver, Ole and deWilde, Jaap, Security: A New Framework of Analysis (London: Lynne Rienner, 1998)Google Scholar.

35 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, p. 63.

36 McSweeney, Bill, Security, Identity, Interests: A Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

37 Huysmans, Jef, ‘Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, On the Creative Development of a Security Studies Agenda in Europe’, European Journal of International Relations, 4:4 (1998), pp. 479–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 For his criticisms to the predecessors see Roe, ‘The Interstate Security Dilemma: Ethnic Conflict as a “Tragedy”?’.

39 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, p. 47.

40 For the detailed discussion, see Bilgin, Pinar, ‘Identity/Security’ in Burgess, Peter J. (ed.), Handbook of New Security Studies (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 81–9Google Scholar.

41 Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, p. 26.

42 Ibid., p. 124.

43 Ibid., p. 150.

44 Ibid., p. 112.

45 Ibid., p. 119.

46 Butterfield, History and Human Relations.

47 Ethnocentric security policies can be identified as those which egoistically aim to provide security for the self, without giving consideration of how these policies affect others, see Booth, Ken, Strategy and Ethnocentrism (New York, Holmes and Meier, 1979), p. 5Google Scholar.

48 Booth and Wheeler, The Security Dilemma, pp. 15–16.

49 Although it is a very important component of the transcender logic, trust-building is not in the analytical scope of this article. For how trust is conceptualised by Booth and Wheeler see The Security Dilemma, pp. 229–45.

50 Smith, ‘Mature Anarchy’.

51 Keohane, Robert O., ‘The Demand for International Regimes’, International Organization, 36:2 (1982), pp. 325–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jervis, Robert, ‘Security Regimes’, International Organization, 36:2 (1982), pp. 357–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Tickner, Ann, ‘You just don't understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41:4 (1997), pp. 611–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, ‘A Framework for the Study of Security Communities’, in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds), The Security Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 29–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Hopf, Ted, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23:1 (1998), pp. 171–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reus-Smit, C., The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Lapid, Yosef and Kratochwil, Frederick, ‘Revisiting the “National”: Toward an Identity Agenda in Neorealism, in Lapid, Y. and Kratochwil, F. (eds), The Return of Culture in IR Theory (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1996), pp. 105–26Google Scholar; Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics; on how changes in structure in turn affect units see Checkel, Jeffrey, ‘Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe’, International Studies Quarterly, 43:1 (1999), pp. 83–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Only Roe mentioned Lapid and Kratochwil's criticism about anarchy conception in societal security dilemma, but he used it as a justification to formulate a theory before ‘anarchy’ is created. However, his approach does not analyse how actors construct and reconstruct anarchy through their actions, see Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, p. 39.

56 Booth, Theory of World Security, p. 218.

57 Buzan, Barry, ‘The Level of Analysis Problem in International Relations Reconsidered’, in Booth, Ken and Smith, Steve (eds), International Relations Theory (Oxford: Polity, 1995), p. 213Google Scholar.

58 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma, pp. 96 and 102.

59 Roe, Societal Security Dilemma and Kaufman, ‘An International Theory of Inter-Ethnic Conflict’.

60 Tang, ‘The Security Dilemma’.

61 The ‘malign/benign intention’ assumption can also be questioned by using approaches which study cognitive mechanisms through decision-makers justify their decisions and actions, see Jervis, 's ‘Cognitive Dissonance’ idea, in Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976), p. 406Google Scholar; Janis, ' ‘Groupthink’ approach, see Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascos (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972)Google Scholar. As an example, see Badie, Dina, ‘Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 6:4 (2010), pp. 277–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Booth, Theory of World Security, p. 254.

63 Bially Mattern, Janice, Ordering International Politics: Identitiy, Crisis and Representational Force (London: Routledge, 2005), p. 9Google Scholar.

64 cf. Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

65 McSweeney, Security, Identity, Interests, p. 73.

66 Ibid.

67 Such as the establishment of the European Economic Community, see Wæver, Ole, ‘Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European non-War Community’, in Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 69–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Bilgin, ‘Identity/Security’, p. 81.

69 Barnett, Michael, ‘Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel's Road to Oslo’, European Journal of International Relations, 5:1 (1999), p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70 Booth and Wheeler, The Security Dilemma, pp. 249–51.

71 Ibid., p. 196.

72 Wæver, ‘Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity’, p. 94.

73 Mojzes, Paul, Yugoslavian Inferno: Ethnoreligious Warfare in the Balkans (New York: Continuum, 1994), pp. 15–45Google Scholar; Pavkovic, Alexander, The Fragmentation of Yugoslavia: Nationalism in a Multinational State (London: Macmillan, 1997), pp. 3–60Google Scholar.

74 Cohen, Lenard J., Broken Bonds: Yugoslavia's Disintegration and Balkan Politics in Transition (2nd edn, Boulder: Westview, 1995), pp. 30–3Google Scholar.

75 Pavkovic, The Fragmentation of Yugoslavia, pp. 72–74.

76 Goati, Vladimir, ‘The Challenge of post-Communism’, in Seroka, Jim and Pavlovic, Vukasin (eds), The Tragedy of Yugoslavia: the Failure of Democratic Transition (London: M. E. Sharpe, 1992), p. 5Google Scholar.

77 Cohen, Broken Bonds, p. 70.

78 Ibid., p. 71.

79 Pavkovic, The Fragmentation of Yugoslavia, p. 105.

80 Cohen, Broken Bonds, p. 63.

81 Ibid., p. 106.

82 Gallagher, Tom, ‘My Neighbour, My Enemy: The Manipulation of Ethnic Identity and the Origins and Conduct of War in Yugoslavia’, Turton, David (ed.), War and Ethnicity: Global Connections and Local Violence (San Marino: University of Rochester Press, 1997), p. 70Google Scholar.

83 Mojzes, Yugoslavian Inferno, p. 162.

84 Banac, Ivo, ‘The Politics of National Homogeneity’, in Blitz, Brad K. (ed.), War and Change in the Balkans: Nationalism, Conflict and Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 30Google Scholar.

85 Cited in Cohen, Broken Bonds, p. 97.

86 For surveys see ibid., p. 32.

87 Banac, ‘The Politics of National Homogeneity’, pp. 32–3.

88 Thomas, Robert, Serbia under Milosevic: Politics in the 1990s (London: Husty and Company, 1999), pp. 109–17Google Scholar.

89 Devic, Ana, ‘Anti-War Initiatives and the un-Making of Civic Identities in the Former Yugoslav Republics’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 10:2 (1997), pp. 130–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Slapsak, Svetlana, ‘The Use of Women and the Role of Women in the Yugoslav War’, in Skjelsbeak, Inger and Smith, Dan (eds), Gender, Peace and Conflict (Oslo and London: PRIO and Sage, 2001), pp. 161–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

91 Hughes, Donna M., Mladjenovic, Lepa, and Mrsevic, Zorica, ‘Feminist Resistance in Serbia’, European Journal of Women's Studies, 2:4 (1995), pp. 509–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bieber, Florian, ‘The Serbian Opposition and Civil Society: Roots of the Delayed Transition in Serbia’, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 17:1 (2003), pp. 73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

92 Devic, ‘Anti-War Initiatives’, p. 139.