No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2009
Professor Krasner's article ‘Third World vulnerabilities and global negotiations’ in the October issue of the Review (Vol. 9, no. 4) is an attempt to provide an alternative way of thinking about the North-South dialogue. The central thesis is that Third World states are concerned with power rather than wealth; that politics and not economics is the overriding determinant of their motivation in seeking changes in the international economic order, Krasner therefore urges Northern states to approach global negotiations with caution and to begin discussions only in those limited areas seen as capable of satisfying mutual economic interests. Indeed Krasner's article reads like a policy document; a paper prepared to catch the eye of the Reagan administration perhaps? Underpinning his analysis is the notion of Third World vulnerability. It is the internal and external vulnerability of these regimes, we are told, which best explains their policy positions.
1. Krasner, Stephen, ‘Third World vulnerabilities and global negotiations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 9 (1983), p. 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Krasner, Ibid.
3. Krasner, Ibid.
4. See for example, Bauer, P. T., Dissent on Development (London, 1976)Google Scholar; MacBean, A. J. and Balasubramanyam, V. N., Meeting The Third World Challenge (London, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Myint, H., Economic Theory and the Underdeveloped Countries (London, 1971).Google Scholar
5. See for example Brandt, W.et al., North-South: A Programme for Survival (London, 1980)Google Scholar; Hansen, R. D., Beyond The North-South Stalemate (New York, 1979);Google ScholarSingh, Jyoti Shankar, A New International Economic Order (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
6. See for example Baran, P., The Political Economy of Growth (Harmondsworth, 1976)Google Scholar; Emanuel, A., Unequal Exchange (London, 1972)Google Scholar; Frank, A. G., Capitalism and Under-development in Latin America (New York and London, 1969).Google ScholarPayer, C, The Debt Trap (Harmondsworth, 1974).Google Scholar
7. General Assembly resolutions 3201 (S-VI) and 3202 (S-YI).
8. General Assembly resolution 3281 (XXIX).
9. TD/183, New Directions and New Structures for Trade and Development. Report of the (UNCTAD) Secretary General.
10. Krasner, op. cit. p. 239.
11. See Buzan, Barry, ‘Negotiating By Consensus: Developments In Technique At the United Nations Conference On The Law Of The Sea’, American Journal of International Law lxxv (1981), pp. 324–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar