Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:57:59.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human rights, state wrongs, and social change: the theory and practice of emancipation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2012

RUTH BLAKELEY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article demonstrates the significance of human rights for challenging state violence and terrorism. It is intended to enhance understanding of the concept of emancipation. Critical Security Studies has tended to focus on the individual as the agent of her/his own liberation. Yet many victims of oppression are not able to free themselves. Drawing on historical materialism, it is argued that collective agency on behalf of the oppressed has a necessary role to play in emancipatory politics. Emancipation is contingent on the capacity of specific agents, located socially and historically, to identify practices that might bring about change, structures that might be transformed, and appropriate agents that are in the best position to facilitate such change. This article shows how such collective social action has forced a reversal of some of the Bush administration's repressive policies, and has partially succeeded in curtailing the arbitrary use of US state power. This has been achieved through the national and international human rights architecture. Therefore, Marxian claims that human rights should be eschewed are mistaken, since they fail to acknowledge the emancipatory potential of human rights, the opportunities they provide for collective social action, and the role they can play in transformative social change.

Type
Articles
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 599 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ben Macintyre, ‘George W. Bush: waterboarding saved London from attacks’, The Times (2010), {http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/public/article2800028.ece} accessed 22 Nov. 2010.

2 BBC, ‘George W Bush claims UK lives “saved by waterboarding”’ (9 November 2010), {http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11715577} accessed 4 Dec. 2011.

3 State terrorism is defined as a threat or act of violence by agents of the state that is intended to induce extreme fear on a target audience, so that they are forced to consider changing their behaviour in some way.

4 Cox, Robert, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10:2 (1981), p. 134CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Breen-Smyth, Marie, ‘A Critical Research Agenda for the Study of Political Terror’, European Political Science, 6:3 (2007), pp. 260–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gunning, Jeroen, ‘A Case for Critical Terrorism Studies?’, Government and Opposition, 42:3 (2007), pp. 363–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, Richard, ‘The Case for Critical Terrorism Studies’, European Political Science, 6:3 (2007), pp. 225–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, Richard, Breen Smyth, Marie, and Gunning, Jeroen (eds), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar.

6 Egerton, Frazer, ‘A Case for a Critical Approach to Terrorism’, European Political Science, 8 (2009), pp. 61–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michel, Torsten and Richards, Anthony, ‘False dawns or new horizons? Further issues and challenges for Critical Terrorism Studies’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 2:3 (2009), pp. 406–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Booth, Ken, Theory of World Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), p. 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Wyn-Jones, Richard, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory (London: Lynne Reinner Publishers, Inc., 1999), p. 24Google Scholar.

9 Booth, Theory of World Security, p. 250.

10 Brown, Chris, ‘Situating Critical Realism’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 35:2 (2007), pp. 409–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herring, Eric, ‘Critical Terrorism Studies: An Activist Scholar Perspective’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1:2 (2008), pp. 197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herring, Eric and Stokes, Doug, ‘Critical realism and historical materialism as resources for critical terrorism studies’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4:1 (2011), pp. 5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Joseph, Jonathan, ‘Critical of What? Terrorism and its Study’, International Relations, 23:1 (2009), pp. 93–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Joseph, Jonathan, ‘Terrorism as a social relation within capitalism: theoretical and emancipatory implications’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 4:1 (2011), pp. 23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stokes, Doug', Ideas and Avocados: Ontologising Critical Terrorism Studies’, International Relations, 23:1 (2009), pp. 85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Mark Rupert, ‘A Retrospective View of the Development of my Research Program’ (2008), {http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/merupert/research%20Summary.htm} accessed 13 Nov. 2008.

12 Jessop, Bob, ‘Gramsci as a Spatial Theorist’, in Bieler, and Morton, (eds), Images of Gramsci (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 27–44Google Scholar.

13 Wight, Colin and Joseph, Jonathan, ‘Scientific Realism and International Relations’, in Joseph, and Wight, (eds), Scientific Realism and International Relations (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 1–30Google Scholar.

14 This was the argument of Jeanne Kirkpatrick, advisor to Ronald Reagan and later US ambassador to the UN, in justifying support for repressive regimes in Latin America during the Cold War. See Kirkpatrick, Jeanne, ‘Dictatorships and Double Standards’, Commentary, 68:5 (1979), pp. 34–45Google Scholar.

15 Much support by the US for repressive regimes that used state terrorism widely in the Cold War, especially in Indochina and Latin America, was justified by the US as counterinsurgency and counterterrorism.

16 Torture and other human rights violations that terrorise are frequently explained away as exceptional behaviour by a few bad apples, as occurred following the abuse of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison during the US occupation of Iraq. For the response of President Bush in this regard see Dana Milbank, ‘Bush Seeks to Reassure Nation on Iraq’, Washington Post (25 May 2004). Major General Taguba who conducted an investigation into the abuses also concluded that it was the work of a few deviant individuals. See Major General Antonio Taguba, ‘Article 15–6 Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade’, in (Washington DC: US Department of Defence, 2004). For critiques, see Jeroen Gunning, ‘A Case for Critical Terrorism Studies?’, pp. 363–93; Eric Herring, ‘Critical Terrorism Studies’, pp. 197–211; Richard Jackson, ‘The Case for Critical Terrorism Studies’, pp. 225–7; Jackson, Richard, ‘The Ghosts of State Terror: Knowledge, Politics and Terrorism Studies’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1:3 (2009), pp. 377–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Joseph, Jonathan, ‘Philosophy in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Approach’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 35:2 (2007), p. 456CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Historical materialism shares some common ground with the philosophical approach referred to variously as critical realism and scientific realism. See Patomäki, Heikki and Wight, Colin, ‘After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism’, International Studies Quarterly, 44:2 (2000), pp. 213–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Indeed, Chris Brown suggests that a recent and growing interest in the philosophy of social science among IR scholars, including a focus on scientific realism, may mean that scientific realism can perform an important role in reinvigorating historical materialism within IR, which, he argues, has been unjustly neglected for at least the last twenty years. See Chris Brown, ‘Situating Critical Realism’, p. 409. See also Eric Herring and Doug Stokes, ‘Critical realism and historical materialism’, pp. 5–21; Jonathan Joseph, ‘Terrorism as a social relation’, pp. 23–37.

18 Joseph, ‘Philosophy in International Relations’, p. 356.

19 Blakeley, Ruth, State Terrorism and Neoliberalism: The North in the South (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar.

20 Ibid.

21 PNAC, ‘Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century’ (2000), {http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf} accessed 11 May 2006.

22 Burbach, Roger and Tarbell, Jim, Imperial Overstretch. George W Bush and the Hubris of Empire (London: Zed Books, 2004), pp. 149–71Google Scholar; Harvey, David, The New Imperialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 1–25 and 87–182Google Scholar; Robinson, William, ‘What to Expect from US “Democracy Promotion” in Iraq’, New Political Science, 26:3 (2004), pp. 441–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 AI, ‘Carnage and Despair: Iraq Five Years On’ (2008), {http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE14/001/2008/en/3f78611b-f1e9-11dc-adcd-cdafd0ab0dfe/mde140012008eng.pdf} accessed 6 Feb. 2010.

24 HRW, ‘Violent Response: The US Army in Falluja’ (2003), {http://www.hrw.org/reports/2003/iraqfalluja/} accessed 6 Feb. 2010.

25 Joseph, ‘Terrorism as a social relation’, pp. 30–1.

26 Leon Panetta, ‘Message from the Director: Interrogation Policy and Contracts: Statement to Employees by Director of the Central Intelligence Agency' (9 April 2009), {https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/directors-statement-interrogation-policy-contracts.html} accessed 24 Apr. 2012.

27 Wyn-Jones, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory, p. 23.

28 Linklater, Andrew, ‘Unnecessary Suffering’, in Booth, and Dunne, (eds), Worlds in Collision. Terror and the Future of Global Order (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), pp. 303–12Google Scholar.

29 McDonald, Matt, ‘Emancipation and Critical Terrorism Studies’, in Jackson, , Smyth, , and Gunning, (eds), Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda (Abingdon: Routledge, 2009), p. 112Google Scholar.

30 Booth, Theory of World Security, p. 112.

31 McDonald, ‘Emancipation and Critical Terrorism Studies’, p. 112.

32 Wyn-Jones, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory, p. 77.

33 McDonald, ‘Emancipation and Critical Terrorism Studies’, p. 113.

34 Booth, Theory of World Security, p. 250.

35 Marx, Karl, ‘On the Jewish Question’, in McLellan, (ed.), Early Texts (Oxford: Blackwell, 1971), p. 92Google Scholar.

36 Ibid., p. 102.

37 Harvey, David, A Companion to Marx's Capital (London: Verso, 2010), p. 49Google Scholar.

38 Douzinas, Costas, The End of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000), p. 160Google Scholar.

39 Ibid., p. 175.

40 Ibid., p. 160.

41 Ibid., p. 163.

42 Ibid., p. 176.

43 Harvey, A Companion to Marx's Capital, p. 309.

44 Ibid., p. 310.

45 McDonald, ‘Emancipation and Critical Terrorism Studies’, p. 112.

46 Ibid., p. 113.

47 Ibid., p. 257.

48 Booth, Theory of World Security, p. 382.

49 Ibid., p. 385.

50 Egerton, ‘A Case for a Critical Approach to Terrorism’, pp. 62–3.

51 This has been explored in detail by Jackson, Richard, Writing the War on Terrorism. Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

52 Wyn-Jones, Security, Strategy and Critical Theory, pp. 153–63.

53 Gramsci, Antonio, Selections from the Prison Notebooks (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971 [orig. pub. 1929–1935]), pp. 355–6Google Scholar.

54 Rupert, Mark, ‘Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance’, Review of International Studies, 29:Supplement S1 (2003), p. 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Joseph, ‘Terrorism as a social relation’, p. 31.

56 Ibid., p. 30.

57 Ibid., p. 31.

58 Ropp, Stephen and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International Norms and Domestic Politics in Chile and Guatemala’, in Risse, , Ropp, , and Sikkink, (eds), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 172–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 CNCTR, ‘Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation’ (1991), {http://www.usip.org/files/resources/collections/truth_commissions/Chile90-Report/Chile90-Report.pdf} accessed 22 Nov. 2010.

60 ACLU, ‘CIA Provides Further Details on Secret Interrogation Memos’ (10 January 2007), {http://www.aclu.org/national-security/cia-provides-further-details-secret-interrogation-memos} accessed 24 Apr. 2012.

61 Bush, George, ‘Executive Order: Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism’, in (The White House, Washington DC: Federal Register, 66:2 (2001), p. 10Google Scholar.

62 Jackson, Richard, ‘Language, Policy, and the Construction of a Torture Culture in the War on Terrorism’, Review of International Studies, 33:3 (2005), pp. 353–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jackson, Writing the War on Terrorism; MacMaster, Neil, ‘Torture: From Algiers to Abu Ghraib’, Race and Class, 46:2 (2004), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Cageprisoners, ‘Beyond the Law – The War on Terror's Secret Network of Detentions’ (2006), {http://www.cageprisoners.com/beyondthelaw.pdf} accessed 5 July 2009.

64 EU, ‘Report on the Alleged Use of European Countries by the CIA for the Transportation and Illegal Detention of Prisoners (2006/2200(INI)) [A-0020/2007]’ (2007), {http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A6-2007-0020+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN} accessed 30 Jan. 2011.

65 Defining cases include: Rasul et al. v Bush; Boumediene v Bush and Al Odah v US; and Hamdan v Rumsfeld. Both the CCR and ACLU websites provide detailed histories of the various cases, along with digital copies of the various affidavits, petitions, and Court rulings.

66 AI, Cageprisoners, CHRGJ, CCR, HRW and Reprieve, ‘Off the Record: US Responsibility for Enforced Disappearances in the “War on Terror”’ (2007), {http://www.chrgj.org/docs/OffRecord/OFF_THE_RECORD_FINAL.pdf} accessed 3 Dec. 2011; CHRGJ, HRF and HRW, ‘By the Numbers: Findings of the Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project’ (2006), {http://chrgj.org/docs/By_The_Numbers.pdf} accessed 26 Mar. 2011.

67 Shannonwatch have been involved in tracking rendition flights that have passed through Shannon Airport in Ireland. See {http://www.shannonwatch.org/}.

68 CCR, ‘Boumediene v Bush / Al Odah v United States’, Center for Constitutional Rights (2008), {http://ccrjustice.org/ourcases/current-cases/al-odah-v.-united-states} accessed 11 Feb. 2011.

69 Paul Wolfowitz, ‘Memorandum for the Secretary of the Navy: Order Establishing Combatant Status Review Tribunals’, US Department of Defense (7 July 2004), {http://www.defense.gov/news/Jul2004/d20040707review.pdf} accessed 3 Dec. 2011.

70 CCR, ‘Boumediene v Bush / Al Odah v United States’.

71 Ibid.

72 DoD, ‘Detainee Treatment Act’, Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006 (30 December 2005), {http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/gazette/2005/12/detainee-treatment-act-of-2005-white.php} accessed 3 Dec. 2011.

73 CCR, ‘Boumediene v Bush / Al Odah v United States’.

74 Ibid.

75 US Congress, ‘Military Commissions Act of 2006’, US Public Law 109–366: 109th Congress (17 October 2006), {http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/PL-109-366.pdf} accessed 3 Dec. 2011.

76 CCR, ‘Boumediene v Bush / Al Odah v United States’.

77 Ibid.

78 Ibid.

79 Obama, Barack, ‘Executive Order 13567, Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force’, The White House, Washington DC: The Federal Register, 76:47 (2011)Google Scholar.

80 Obama, Barack, ‘Executive Order 13492, Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base and Closure of Detention Facilities’, The White House, Washington DC: Federal Register, 74:16 (2009)Google Scholar.

81 Obama, Barack, ‘Executive Order 13493, Review of Detention Policy Options’, The White House, Washington DC: Federal Register, 74:16 (2009)Google Scholar.

82 Obama, Barack, ‘Executive Order 13491, Ensuring Lawful Interrogations’, The White House, Washington DC: The Federal Register, 74:16 (2009), p. 4894Google Scholar.

83 Barack Obama, ‘Executive Order 13567, Periodic Review of Individuals Detained at Guantánamo Bay Naval Station Pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force’.

84 IJN, ‘International Justice Network Clients’ (2011), {http://www.ijnetwork.org/clients} accessed 11 Feb. 2011.

85 See for example El-Masri v Macedonia, available at: {http://www.soros.org/initiatives/justice/litigation/macedonia/Application-Public-Version-20090921.pdf}.

86 Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, pp. 355–6.

87 Mark Rupert, ‘Globalising common sense: a Marxian-Gramscian (re-)vision of the politics of governance/resistance’, p. 185.

88 Ibid.

89 Costas Douzinas, The End of Human Rights, p. 169.

90 Blakeley, Ruth, ‘Dirty Hands, Clean Conscience? The CIA Inspector General's Investigation of “Enhanced Interrogation Techniques” in the “War on Terror” and the Torture Debate’, Journal of Human Rights, 10:4 (2011), pp. 544–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.