Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:19:13.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining cross-industry variations in trade protection: textiles, clothing and footwear in Canada*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

M. Ramesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The high level of protection for the textile, clothing and footwear industries in the developed countries is well recognized in the literature. What is not so well recognized is the significant variations in the level and form of protection accorded them and the crucial role that international forces have played in shaping the variations. The studies that do focus on international factors deal with the largest state and therefore provide little insight into trade protection in smaller states. These shortcomings persist despite the fact that trade protection is perhaps the most intensively studied phenomenon in political economy. This paper attempts to plug these gaps in the literature through the study of textile, clothing and footwear industries in Canada.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 75 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Baldwin, Robert E., ‘Trade Policies in Developed Countries’, in Handbook of International Economics, ed. Jones, Ronald W. and Kenen, Peter B. (Amsterdam, 1984), I, pp. 571–619Google Scholar; Lavergne, R. P., The Political Economy of US Tariffs (New York: Academic Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Mark, Stephen V. and McArthur, John, ‘Empirical Analyses of the Determinants of Protection: A Survey and Some New Results’ in International Trade Policies, ed. Odell, John S. and Willett, Thomas D. (Ann Arbor, 1990), pp. 105Google Scholar 40; Trebilcock, Michael J., Marsha Chandler and Robert Howse, Trade and Transitions: A Comparative Analysis of Adjustment Policies (London, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Brock, W. A. and Magee, S. P., ‘Tariff Formation in a Democracy; in Current Issues in Commercial Policy and Diplomacy, ed. Black, J. and Hindley, B. (London, 1984)Google Scholar; Caves, R. E., ’Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada's Tariff Structure, Canadian Journal of Economics 9, (1976), pp. 278–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lehmbruch, G., ‘Interest Groups, Government, and the Politics of Protectionism’, in Protectionism and Structural Adjustment, ed. Hauser, Heinz (Grusch, 1986), pp. 111–40Google Scholar; McKeown, Timothy, ‘Firms and Tariff Regime Change: Explaining the Demand for Protection’, 36, World Politics (1984), pp. 215–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pincus, J. J., ‘Pressure Groups and Politics and the Pattern of Tariffs’, Journal of Political Economy, 83 (1975), pp. 757–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schattschneider, E. E., Politics, Pressures and the Tariff (New York, 1935)Google Scholar.

3 Anderson, Kym and Baldwin, Robert E., ‘The Political Market for Protection in Industrial Countries’, in Protection, Cooperation, Integration and Development, ed. El–Agraa, Ali M. (London, 1987), pp. 20–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hillman, H. L., The Political Economy of Protection (Chur, Switzerland, 1989)Google Scholar.

4 Lake, David A., ‘The State and American Trade Strategy in the Pre–Hegemonic Era’, International Organization, 42 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ikenberry, G. John, ‘Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Policy’, International Organization, 42 (1988), pp. 219–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Krasner, Stephen D., ‘United States Commercial Policy: Unraveling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness’, in Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, ed. Katzenstein, Peter (Madison, 1978), pp. 47–66Google Scholar; Lake, David A, Power, Protection and Free Trade: International Sources of U.S. Commercial Strategy, 1887–1939 (Ithaca, 1988)Google Scholar; Goldstein, Judith, ‘Ideas, Institutions, and American Trade Policy’, International Organization, 42 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Krasner, Stephen D., ‘State Power and the Structure of International Trade’, World Politics, 28 (1976), pp. 317–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Keohane, Robert O., ‘The Theory of Hegemonic Stability and Changes in International Economic Regimes, 1967–1977’, In Changes in the International System, ed. Holsti, Ole et al. (Boulder, 1980), pp. 131–62Google Scholar; Aggarwal, Vinod, Liberal Protectionism: The International Political Economy of Organized Textile Trade (Berkeley, 1985)Google Scholar; Lake, Power, Protection and Free Trade.

8 Friman, H. Richard, Patchwork Protectionism: Textile Trade Policy in the United States, Japan, and West Germany (Ithaca, 1990)Google Scholar; Underhill, Geoffrey R. D., ‘Industrial Crisis and International Regimes: France, the EEC and International Trade in Textiles, 1974–84’, Millenium: Journal of International Studies, 19 (1990), pp. 185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lake, ‘Power’.

9 Destler, I. M. and Odell, J., Anti–Protection: Changing Forces in United States Trade Politics (Washington, 1987)Google Scholar; Krasner, Stephen D., ‘The Tokyo Round: Particularistic Interests and Prospects for Stability in the Global System’, International Studies Quarterly, 23 (1979), pp. 491–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Milner, Helen V., Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade (Princeton, 1988)Google Scholar.

10 Helleiner, G. K., ‘The Political Economy of Canada's Tariff Structure: An Alternative Model’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 10 (1977), pp. 318–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lavergne, The Political Economy.

11 Gourevitch, Peter, Politics in Hard Times (Ithaca, 1986)Google Scholar.

12 Aggarwal, Vinod K., Keohane, Robert and Yoffie, David B., ‘The Dynamics of Negotiated Protectionism’, American Political Science Review, 81 (1987), pp. 345–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Trebilcock et al., Trade and Transitions

13 See Hall, Peter, Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (Cambridge, 1986)Google Scholar; Atkinson, M. and Coleman, W., ‘Strong States and Weak States: Sectoral Policy Networks in Advanced Capitalist Economies’, British Journal of Political Science, 19 (1989), pp. 47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nordlinger, Eric A., ‘Taking the State Seriously’, in Understanding Political Development, ed. Weiner, Myron and Huntington, Samuel P. (Boston), pp. 353–91Google Scholar; Skocpol Theda, ‘Bringing the State Back In’, in Bringing the State Back In, ed. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (Cambridge), pp. 3–43; Jessop, Bob, State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; Ikenberry, ‘Conclusion’.

14 Mahon, Rianne, Politics of Industrial Restructuring: Canadian Textiles (Toronto, 1984)Google Scholar.

15 Hall, Governing the Economy.

16 Cohen, Benjamin, ‘The Political Economy of International Trade’, International Organization, 44 (1990), pp. 261–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gourevitch, Politics in Hard Times; Keohane, ‘Theory of Hegemonic Stability’.

17 Grieco, Joseph M., ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, 42 (1988), pp. 485–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’, International Organization, 41 (1987), pp. 725–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 This conception of international political economy is consistent with the one implicit in Krasner, Stephen, ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in International Regimes, ed. Krasner, Stephen (Ithaca, 1983), pp. 1–21Google Scholar.

20 Compare this to the slightly broader definition offered by Keohane, who defines institutions as ‘persistent and connected sets of rules (formal or informal) that prescribe behavioral roles, constrain activity, and shape expectations’. Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder, 1989), p. 163Google Scholar.

21 This is a partial list of the measures of the states' structural strength. A more comprehensive list would include military strength, relative labour productivity, and dependence on foreign investment. The central importance of the two dimensions of relative size and trade dependence are unlikely to be contentious and are, in any case, sufficient for the purpose of explaining cross–industry variations. However, a larger study of variations across several industries in several countries may need to take other measures into account as well. See Friman, Patchwork Protectionism, p. 29; Lake, ‘Power’, p. 30; Waltz, Kenneth, ‘The Myth of National Interdependence’, in The International Corporation, ed. Kindleberger, Charles (Cambridge, Mass, 1970), pp. 205–23Google Scholar.

22 Knorr, Klaus, The Power of Nations: The Political Economy of International Relations (New York, 1975)Google Scholar; Krasner, Stephen D., Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism (Berkeley, 1985)Google Scholar.

23 Katzenstein, Peter, Small States in World Markets (Ithaca, 1985), p. 40Google Scholar.

24 Blokker, Niels, International Regulation of World Trade in Textiles (Dordrech, 1989), pp. 268–9Google Scholar.

25 Preusse, Heinz Gert, ‘Voluntary Export Restraint-An Effective Means Against a Spread of Neo–Protectionism?’ Journal of World Trade, 25 (1991), p. 9Google Scholar.

26 Aggarwal, Liberal Protectionism.

27 OECD, Textile and Clothing Industries: Structural Problems and Politics in OECD Countries (Paris, 1983), pp. 11–14Google Scholar.

28 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, International Trade: 88–89 (Geneva, 1989)Google Scholar.

29 Anderson, Kym, ‘Textiles and Clothing in Global Economic Development: East Asia's Dynamic Role‘, World Competition, 14 (1991), p. 100Google Scholar.

30 Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, World Statistical Compendium for Raw Hides, Skins Leather and Leather Footwear: 1968–1987 (Rome, 1989)Google Scholar.

31 GATT (1989), International Trade.

32 Canada, Consultative Task Force on Textiles and Clothing, Report to the Minister of Industry, Trade and Commerce (1978)Google Scholar; Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Textiles (Ottawa, 1988)Google Scholar.

33 For instance, between 1983 and 1987, the average annual after–tax profits as a percentage of total income was 4.17 in the textile industry, compared to 3.55 for all manufacturing. Canada, Textile and Clothing Board, Report on Textile and Clothing (Ottawa, 1988), p. 16Google Scholar.

34 Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Textiles (see fn 32).

35 Canada, Consultative Task Force on Textiles and Clothing (see fn 32); Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Clothing (Ottawa, 1988).

36 Canada, Textiles and Clothing Board (see fn 33).

37 Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Clothing (see fn 35).

38 Mahon, Politics of Industrial Restructuring.

39 Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Footwear (Ottawa, 1988)Google Scholar.

40 M. Ramesh, The Politics of Industrial Adjustment in Canada: The Case of the Footwear Industry‘, unpublished PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1988.

41 Atkinson, Michael A. and Coleman, William D., The State Business and Industrial Change in Canada (Toronto, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Howlett, Michael and Ramesh, M., Political Economy of Canada (Toronto, 1992)Google Scholar.

42 Mahon, Politics of Industrial Restructuring.

43 Ibid.; Ramesh, Politics of Industrial Adjustment.

44 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Handbook of International Trade and Development Statistics: Supplement (New York, 1988)Google Scholar.

45 Glazebrook, George, ‘The Middle Powers in the United Nations System’, International Organization 1 (1947), pp. 307–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ropp, Theodore, ‘Politics, Strategy and the Commitment of a Middlepower’, in Canada–US Treaty Relations, ed. Deener, David (Durham, 1963)Google Scholar; Wood, Bernard, The Middle Powers and the General Interest (Ottawa, 1988)Google Scholar.

46 Canada, External Affairs, A Review of Canadian Trade Policy (Ottawa, 1983), p. 20Google Scholar.

47 International Monetary Fund, Direction of Trade Statistics (Washington, D.C., 1989)Google Scholar.

48 Hirschman, Albert, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley, 1945)Google Scholar; Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph, Power and Interdependence (Boston, 1977)Google Scholar.

49 OECD, The Impact of the Newly Industrializing Countries on Production and Trade in Manufactures (Paris, 1979)Google Scholar.

50 GATT Secretariat, ‘Inventory of Article XIX Actions and Other Measures Which Appear to Serve the Same Purpose’, Document No. MTN.GNG/NG9/W/2, 12 May, 1987.

51 GATT, Textiles and Clothing in the World Economy (Geneva, 1984)Google Scholar.

52 Food and Agricultural Organization (see fn 30).

53 Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Textile; Clothing; Footwear.

54 Canada, Tariff Board, The GATT Agreement on Customs Valuation: Tariff Adjustment, Report, Reference 159. Ottawa: Supply and Services (1983), Part II.

55 Ibid.

56 Ibid. pp. 6–7.

57 Winham, Gilbert, International Trade and the Tokyo Round (Princeton, 1986), p. 106Google Scholar.

58 Ibid. p. 227.

59 Hart, Michael, Canadian Economic Development and the International Trading System (Toronto, 1985)Google Scholar.

60 Canada, Department of Industry, Science and Technology, Textile (see fn 32).

61 Ahmad, Jaleel, Trade–Related, Sector–Specific Industrial Adjustment Policies in Canada: An Analysis of Textile, Clothing, and Footwear Industries, Discussion Paper No. 345 (Ottawa, 1988), p. 38Google Scholar.

62 Economic Council of Canada, Adjustment Policies for Trade–Sensitive Industries (Ottawa, 1988), p. 67Google Scholar.

63 Ahmad, Industrial Adjustment Policies, p. 39.

64 Zheng, Henry R., Legal Structures of International Textile Trade (New York, 1988)Google Scholar.

65 GATT Secretariat, ‘Agreement on Textiles and Clothing’, Document No. MYN.TNC/W/35/Rev.l, 1990.