Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:14:22.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining British-Irish cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2010

ETAIN TANNAM
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article applies rational institutionalism, to the case of the British-Irish relationship. Hypotheses are drawn about the role of institutions in advancing cooperation. In section two an overview and analysis of British-Irish agreements and policymaking processes are provided. In section three, the role of institution-building in causing British-Irish cooperation is highlighted. In conclusion, the enduring relevance of rational institutionalism to the British-Irish case is highlighted and its potential to understand conflict in the 21st century is stressed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 2011 , pp. 1191 - 1214
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ted Barrington, Irish Ambassador to UK, 1995–2001, ‘Lecture to Department of Politics’, University College Dublin (10 October 2002).

2 O'Leary, Brendan, ‘The Anglo-Irish Agreement: Folly or Statecraft?’, in O'Leary, Brendan and McGarry, John (eds), The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 62–96Google Scholar .

3 O'Leary, Brendan, ‘The Anglo-Irish Agreement: Meanings, Explanations, Results and a Defence’, in Teague, (ed.), Beyond the Rhetoric: politics, the economy and social policy in Northern Ireland (London, Lawrence and Wishart, 1987), pp. 11–41Google Scholar .

4 O'Leary, Brendan and McGarry, John, The Politics of Antagonism (London, Athlone, 1993), p. 229Google Scholar .

5 O'Leary, and McGarry, , The Politics of Antagonism, pp. 235–237Google Scholar .

6 Wight, Martin, ‘Why Is There No International Theory?’, in Derian, James Der (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations (Basingstoke, Macmillan. 1995), p. 32Google Scholar .

7 For example, O'Duffy, Brendan, British-Irish Relations and Northern Ireland: from violent politics to conflict regulation (Dublin, Irish Academic Press, 2007)Google Scholar .

8 Keohane cited in Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, Rittberger, Volker, ‘Interests, Power, Knowledge: the Study of International Regimes’, Mershon International Studies Review, 40 (1996), pp. 177–228, p. 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

9 Hasenclever, Mayer and Rittberger, ‘Interests, Power, Knowledge: the Study of International Regimes’, p. 182.

10 Keohane, Robert and Nye, Joseph, Power and Interdependence(New York, Longman, 2001)Google Scholar .

11 Jervis, Robert, ‘Realism, Neoliberalism and Cooperation: understanding the debate’, International Security, 24: 1 (1999), pp. 42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

12 Keohane, , After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984), p. 2Google Scholar .

13 Snyder and Diesing quoted in Keohane, After Hegemony, p. 66.

14 Keohane, After Hegemony, p. 73.

15 Keohane and Nye, Power and Interdependence, p. 7.

16 Keohane, After Hegemony, p. 43.

17 Keohane and Nye, Power and Interdependence, p. 10.

18 Ibid., p. 11.

19 Ibid., p. 12.

20 Ibid., p. 15.

21 Ibid., p. 16.

22 Ibid., p. 16.

23 Ibid., p. 147.

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid., p. 150.

26 Ibid.

27 Ibid., p. 157.

28 Ibid., p. 153.

29 Ibid.

30 Ibid., p. 177.

31 Ibid., p. 180.

32 Karl, Deutsch cited in Robert, Jervis, ‘Theories of War in an Era of Leading–Power Peace’, Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, American Political Science Review, 96 (2001), pp 1–14, p. 1Google Scholar .

33 There have been disputes historically in the Canadian USA relationship: most notably over the state of Maine in 1812 and over ownership of part of Alaska (the ‘pan-handle’) after Alaska was bought by USA in 1867.

34 Robert Keohane, After Hegemony, p. 2.

35 O'Hagan, John, ‘The Historical Background’, in O'Hagan, J. (ed.), The Economy of Ireland (Dublin, Gill and Macmillan, 1984), pp. 19–20Google ScholarPubMed .

36 Brendan O'Leary and John McGarry, The Politics of Antagonism, p. 172.

37 Mesquita, B. B. De, McDermott, R., Cope, E., ‘The Expected Prospects for Peace in Northern Ireland’, International Interactions, 27: 2 (2001), p. 143, pp. 129–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

38 John Coakley, in Michael Gallagher and John Coakley (eds), Politics in the Republic of Ireland.

39 Moravcsik, Andrew, ‘Negotiating the Single European Act, in Keohane, R., and Hoffmann, S., The New European Community(Boulder, Westview, 1993), p. 49Google Scholar .

40 Daniel Naurin, ‘Measuring and Explaining Network Capital in the Council of Ministers’ Presentation made at Trinity College, Dublin's Political Science Department's Friday Seminar Series, Dublin (29 February 2008).

41 Keatinge, Patrick, ‘Un-Equal Sovereigns: the Diplomatic Dimension of Anglo-Irish Relations’, in Drudy, P. J. (ed.), Ireland and Britain Since 1922 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 139–161Google Scholar .

42 Tannam, Etain, ‘Explaining the Good Friday Agreement: a learning process’, Government and Opposition, 36 (2001), p. 498CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

43 O'Duffy, Brendan, British-Irish Relations and Northern Ireland(Dublin, Irish Academic Press, 2007) p. 100Google Scholar .

44 Selection of controversies drawn from Flackes, William and Elliott, Sydney, Northern Ireland; a political directory(Belfast, Blackstaff, 1993)Google Scholar and Irish Times reports (2000–2001).

45 Garrett, Fitzgerald, All in a Life(Dublin, Gill and Macmillan, 1990), p. 168Google Scholar .

46 Elliott and Flackes, Northern Ireland: a political directory, p. 8.

47 Ibid., p. 23.

48 Ibid., p. 29.

49 Ibid.

50 O'Leary,The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements, p. 97.

51 O'Duffy, British-Irish Relations and Northern Ireland, p. 181.

52 Ibid.

53 Tannam, ‘Explaining the Good Friday Agreement’.

54 Interview, Anglo-Irish Division (AID), Irish Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), (17 May 2007).

55 Interview with the author, AID (17 November 2008).

56 Ibid.

57 Jervis, ‘Realism, Neoliberalism and Cooperation’, p. 53.

58 Ibid., p. 54.

59 Patrick Keatinge, Irish Studies in International Affairs (1987), Irish Foreign Policy, Nicholas Rees, Irish Studies in International Affairs (1997–2008).

60 Interview with the author, DFA (17 May 2007).

61 Ibid.

62 Rees, ‘Ireland's Foreign Relations’, Irish Review of International Studies, 15 (2004), p. 221.

63 Interview with the author, Dermot Nally, Secretary to Irish Government, 1986–7 November 2002.

64 Ted Barrington, ‘Lecture to Department of Politics and International Relations’, University College Dublin (10 October 2002).

65 Tannam, E., Cross-Border Cooperation in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland (Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

66 Interview with the author, Department of the Environment (27 March 2003).

67 Powell, Jonathon, Great Hatred, Little Room: making peace in Northern Ireland(London, Bodley Head, 2008)Google Scholar .

68 B. O'Leary, interview with the author (17 October 2008).

69 O'Duffy, British-Irish Relations and Northern Ireland, p. 98.

70 Ibid., p. 102.

71 O'Leary and McGarry, The Politics of Antagonism, p. 246.

72 Robin Wilson cited in Elizabeth Meehan, ‘From the EU in Northern Ireland to Northern Ireland in the EU’, in Farrington, Christopher (ed.), Global Change, Civil Society and the Northern Ireland Peace Process(Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2008), pp. 106, pp. 91–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

73 Keatinge, ‘Un-Equal Sovereigns’, p. 144.

74 Ibid.

75 Vita quoted in Arthur, Paul, Special Relationships: Britain, Ireland and the Northern Ireland Problem(Belfast, Blackstaff, 2001), p. 94Google Scholar .

76 Keatinge, ‘Un-Equal Sovereigns’, p. 146.

77 John Bowman, Irish Times, 3 (January 2003), p. 5.

78 Keohane, After Hegemony, p. 53.

79 O'Leary and McGarry, The Politics of Antagonism, p. 230.

80 Meehan, Elizabeth, ‘Britain's Irish Question: Britain's European Question? British-Irish Relations in the Context of EU and the Belfast Agreement’, Review of International Studies, 26 (2000) pp. 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

81 O'Leary and McGarry, The Politics of Antagonism, p. 214.

82 Ibid.

83 O'Leary, The Northern Ireland Conflict: Consociational Engagements, p. 79.

84 Ibid., p. 81.

85 Ibid., p. 82.