Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2009
The relevance of history
The title of this essay may sound odd, if not inexplicable. ‘Entering the future backwards’ —the quotation comes from the French poet, Paul Valery and it seems to me to have utility in this context in both a theoretical and practical mode. Theoretical, because the term reminds us that as scholars and teachers we have an obligation when we reflect upon a confused and alarming present to think historically, i.e., to ask ourselves what is unique about our current global circumstances. We can only do this by probing the past to determine whether there are any significant parallels which might illustrate an understanding of the present. But the idea that states and statespersons—apart from scholars—enter the future backwards also has some substance: after all, politicians—understandably—confronted by unexpected cataclysmic change attempt to understand that change in terms of traditional assumptions about the structure, process and philosophical bases of international society. They may do it intuitively, but they do it none the less. And this, one might argue, applies to the scholarly community as well.
1 Aron, Raymond, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations (New York, 1966), p. 373Google Scholar.
2 Marr, Andrew, ‘A Dumb Witness Mouthing Horror’, The Independent, 10 February 1993Google Scholar. See also Jenkins, Simon, ‘The Swamp of Civil War’, The Times, 10 February 1993Google Scholar.
3 Walker, David, ‘Sterling Service’, Times Higher Educational Supplement, 20 November 1993Google Scholar.
4 Moisie, Dominic, ‘Britain's Failure, or all Europe's?’, The Independent, 11 December 1992Google Scholar.
5 Marr, Andrew, ‘Business As Usual or The New Imperialism?’, The Independent, 21 January 1993Google Scholar.
6 Financial Times, 6 January 1993Google Scholar.