Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:11:20.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The English school of international relations: a case for closure*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Roy E. Jones
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There now exists a substantial body of publications on international relations which may be fairly described as the output of a distinct school. Though its seminal thinkers, Charles Manning and Martin Wight, are no longer with us, the core of its extant membership (Hedley Bull, Michael Donelan, F. S. Northedge, Robert Purnell and others) is still in its prime and young recruits are constantly coming forward. Though delighted by this human prospect, its literary possibilities find me something less than enthusiastic. For it seems to me that repetition has set in and is likely to get worse as the years pass.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wight, M., ‘Why is there no International Theory?’, Diplomatic Investigations, Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), (London, 1966), pp. 17–34Google Scholar.

2. Manning, C. A. W., The Nature of International Society (London, 1962)Google Scholar, Preface.

3. Manning, op. cit. pp. 200–1.

4. Alfred Schutz, ‘Some Leading Concepts of Phenomenology’, cited by Wolff, Kurt H. in ‘Phenomenology and Sociology’, A History of Sociological Analysis, Bottomore, T. and Nisbet, R. (eds.), (London, 1979), p. 506Google Scholar.

5. Donelan, M., ‘Introduction’, The Reason of States, Donelan, Michael (ed.), (London, 1978), p. 11Google Scholar.

6. Manning, op. cit. p. 103.

7. Manning, op. cit. p. 106.

8. Manning, op. cit. p. 107.

9. Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (London, 1977), pp. 13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10. Bull, op. cit. p. 16.

11. On this point see Forsyth, Murray, ‘Thomas Hobbes and the external relation of states’, British Journal of International Studies, v (1979), pp. 196–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12. See Manning, op. cit. p. 166; and James, Alan, ‘International Society’, British Journal of International Studies, iv (1978), p. 103Google Scholar.

13. Northedge, F. S., The International Political System (London, 1976)Google Scholar, Preface.

14. Northedge, op. cit. Preface.

15. Donelan, op. cit. p. 19.

16. Manning, op. cit. p. 211.

17. Bull, op. cit. chapter 8.

18. See Keynes, J. M., Memorials of Alfred Marshall, Pigou, A. C. (ed.), (London, 1925), p. 9Google Scholar.

19. See Brian Porter on Martin Wight, Donelan, op. cit. pp. 64–74.

20. M. Wight ‘Western Values in International Relations’, Butterfield and Wight, op. cit. 89–131.

21. Wight, M., Power Politics (London, 1979), p. 202Google Scholar.

22. M. Wight, op. cit. p. 87.

23. M. Wight, op. cit. p. 89.

24. M. Wight, op. cit. p. 93.

25. Donelan, op. cit. p. 16.