Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:03:39.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The eighteenth-century historiographic tradition and contemporary ‘Everyday IPE’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

MATTHEW WATSON
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on Adam Smith's largely sympathetic response to the Rousseauian critique of the moral degeneracy of modern ‘economic man’. It thus emphasises his philosophical ambivalence towards commercial society over the textbook IPE presentations which ascribe to him an almost wholly unreflexive market advocacy. In doing so it provides important methodological lessons for the study of Everyday IPE today. Arnaldo Momigliano has identified a decisive break in historical method in the eighteenth century, of which Smith and Rousseau were key exponents. However unwittingly, contemporary Everyday IPE scholars are the spiritual heirs of the eighteenth-century move from writing public histories of the state to writing private histories of unnamed individuals who embody the most recent phase of human sociability. The eighteenth-century economic man was conceptualised in relation to evolving forms of economic organisation, where the economy in turn was thought to reflect the prevailing system of ‘manners’. Smith united with Rousseau in the belief that their society's bourgeois politeness allowed materialist ideologies to corrupt the moral autonomy of the individual. The historical method underpinning such concerns also allows Everyday IPE scholars to ground similarly-styled attempts to understand threats to moral autonomy arising from the struggle over economic surplus today.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, amongst others, Amoore, Louise, Globalisation Contested: An International Political Economy of Work (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Elias, Juanita, Fashioning Inequality: The Multinational Company and Gendered Employment in a Globalizing World (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004)Google Scholar; Franklin, Marianne, Postcolonial Politics, the Internet, and Everyday Life (London: Routledge, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Aitken, Rob, Performing Capital: Toward a Cultural Economy of Popular and Global Finance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watson, Alison, The Child in International Political Economy: A Place at the Table (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar.

2 Cohen, Benjamin J., International Political Economy: An Intellectual History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

3 For an early precursor, see, Murphy, Craig and Tooze, Roger, ‘Getting Beyond the “Common Sense” of the IPE Orthodoxy’, in Murphy, Craig and Tooze, Roger (eds), The New International Political Economy (London: Lynne Rienner, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See, in particular, Momigliano, Arnaldo, ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, 13:3/4 (1950), pp. 285–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Momigliano, Arnaldo, ‘Gibbon's Contribution to Historical Method’, Historia, 2:4 (1954), pp. 450–63Google Scholar.

5 Phillips, Mark Salber, ‘Reconsiderations on History and Antiquarianism: Arnaldo Momigliano and the Historiography of Eighteenth-Century Britain’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 57:2 (1996), pp. 297–316, 300CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Pocock, J. G. A., ‘Adam Smith and History’, in Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), p. 27Google Scholar.

7 This general tendency is really well captured – and critiqued – in Brown, Vivienne, ‘Metanarratives and Economic Discourse’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96:1 (1994), pp. 83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Tabb, William, Reconstructing Political Economy: The Great Divide in Economic Thought (London: Routledge, 1999)Google Scholar.

8 An important book showing why this was not the case is Colander, David, The Lost Art of Economics: Essays on Economics and the Economics Profession (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2001)Google Scholar.

9 Heilbroner, Robert, Teachings from the Worldly Philosophers, new edn (London: W. W. Norton, 1997), p. 246Google Scholar.

10 Woolf, D. R., ‘A Feminine Past? Gender, Genre, and Historical Knowledge in England, 1500–1800’, American Historical Review, 102:3 (1997), pp. 645–79, 665–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Phillips, Mark Salber, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740–1820 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 176–7Google Scholar.

12 Adam Smith, ‘A Letter to the Authors of the Edinburgh Review’, reprinted in Smith, Adam, Essays on Philosophical Subjects, ed. Bryce, J.C. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund Press, 1982 [1756])Google Scholar.

13 Fleischacker, Samuel, On Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations: A Philosophical Companion (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), p. 117Google Scholar.

14 Rasmussen, Dennis, The Problems and Promise of Commercial Society: Adam Smith's Response to Rousseau (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008), p. 60Google Scholar.

15 Watson, Matthew, Foundations of International Political Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 172–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Hobson, John and Seabrooke, Leonard, ‘Everyday IPE: Revealing Everyday Forms of Change in the World Economy’, in Hobson, John and Seabrooke, Leonard (eds), Everyday Politics of the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

17 One excellent example of such work is: Kerkvliet, Benedict, The Power of Everyday Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005)Google Scholar. Another example is Morton, Adam David, ‘Peasants as Subaltern Agents in Latin America: Neoliberalism, Resistance and the Power of the Powerless’, in Hobson, John and Seabrooke, Leonard (eds), Everyday Politics of the World Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

18 See, for example, Davies, Matt and Ryner, Magnus (eds), Poverty and the Production of World Politics: Unprotected Workers in the Global Political Economy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Langley, Paul, The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Blaney, David and Inayatullah, Naeem, ‘Undressing the Wound of Wealth: Political Economy as a Cultural Project’, in Best, Jacqueline and Paterson, Matthew (eds), Cultural Political Economy (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar.

20 Best, Jacqueline and Paterson, Matthew, ‘Introduction: Understanding Cultural Political Economy’, in Best, Jacqueline and Paterson, Matthew (eds), Cultural Political Economy (London: Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar.

21 Murphy, Craig and Tooze, Roger, ‘Introduction’, in Murphy, Craig and Tooze, Roger (eds), The New International Political Economy (London: Lynne Rienner, 1991), p. 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 Rosow, Stephen, ‘Echoes of Commercial Society: Liberal Political Theory in Mainstream IPE’, in Burch, Kurt and Denemark, Robert (eds), Constituting International Political Economy (London: Lynne Rienner, 1997), pp. 42–4Google Scholar.

23 On which, see Rothschild, Emma, Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001), pp. 116–56Google Scholar.

24 This has been described as nothing less than a ‘renaissance’ in Smith studies. See Recktenwald, Horst Claus, ‘An Adam Smith Renaissance anno 1976? The Bicentenary Output. A Reappraisal of his Scholarship’, Journal of Economic Literature, 16:1 (1978), pp. 56–83Google Scholar.

25 Montes, Leonidas, Adam Smith in Context: A Critical Reassessment of some Central Components of His Thought (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Smith admired Gibbon as a person, but Rousseau did not. See respectively Rae, John, Life of Adam Smith (London: Macmillan, 1895), p. 414Google Scholar; Edmonds, David and Eidinow, John, Rousseau's Dog: Two Great Thinkers at War in the Age of Enlightenment (London: Faber and Faber, 2006), p. 57Google Scholar.

27 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon's Contribution to Historical Method’, p. 459.

28 Ibid., p. 457.

29 Ibid., p. 453.

30 Ibid., p. 307.

31 Ibid., p. 453.

32 Phillips, ‘Reconsiderations on History and Antiquarianism’, pp. 297–8.

33 Momigliano, Arnaldo, ‘The Introduction of the Teaching of History as an Academic Subject and Its Implications’, Minerva, 21:1 (1983), pp. 1–15, p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Bloch, Marc, The Historian's Craft (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1992), p. 27Google Scholar.

35 Momigliano, ‘Gibbon's Contribution to Historical Method’, p. 459.

36 Pocock, J. G. A., Barbarism and Religion, Volume Two: Narratives of Civil Government (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37 Watt, Ian, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1974), p. 38Google Scholar.

38 Schonhorn, Manuel, Defoe's Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 47–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 O'Brien, Karen, Narratives of Enlightenment: Cosmopolitan History from Voltaire to Gibbon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 Momigliano, ‘The Introduction of the Teaching of History’, p. 7.

41 Bowerstock, G. W., ‘Momigliano's Quest for the Person’, History and Theory, 30:4 (1991), pp. 27–36, 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Harkin, Maureen, ‘Adam Smith's Missing History: Primitives, Progress, and Problems of Genre’, English Literary History, 72:2 (2005), pp. 429–51, 438–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Phillips, Mark Salber, ‘Adam Smith and the History of Private Life: Social and Sentimental Narratives in Eighteenth-Century Historiography’, in Kelley, Donald and Sacks, David Harris (eds), The Historical Imagination in Early Modern Britain: History, Rhetoric, and Fiction, 1500–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 326Google Scholar.

44 Miller, Peter, ‘Momigliano, Benjamin, and Antiquarianism after the Crisis of Historicism’, in Miller, Peter (ed.), Momigliano and Antiquarianism: Foundations of the Modern Cultural Sciences (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007), p. 337Google Scholar.

45 Allen, N. J., ‘The Category of the Person: A Reading of Mauss's Last Essay’, in Carrithers, Michael, Collins, Steven, and Lukes, Steven (eds), The Category of the Person: Anthropology, Philosophy, History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 39Google Scholar.

46 Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, Volume Two, p. 20.

47 Harkin, ‘Adam Smith's Missing History’, p. 439.

48 Ignatieff, Michael, The Needs of Strangers (London: Chatto and Windus, 1984), pp. 111–13Google Scholar.

49 Berry, Christopher, The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Hirschman, Albert, The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, Twentieth Anniversary Edition (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997 [1977]), pp. 56–63Google Scholar.

51 McCloskey, Deirdre, The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 2006), pp. 72–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Rosenblatt, Helena, Rousseau and Geneva: From the First Discourse to the Social Contract, 1749–1762 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 60–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Phillips, Society and Sentiment, pp. 176–7.

54 Woolf, ‘A Feminine Past?’, p. 653.

55 O'Brien, Narratives of Enlightenment, p. 16.

56 Poovey, Mary, A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 214–63Google Scholar.

57 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Politics and the Arts: Letter to M. d'Alembert on the Theater, trans. notes, introduction Bloom, Allan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968 [1758])Google Scholar.

58 Costelloe, Timothy, ‘The Theater of Morals: Culture and Community in Rousseau's Lettre á M. d'Alembert’, Eighteenth-Century Life, 27:1 (2003), pp. 52–71, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Banerjee, Amal, ‘Rousseau's Concept of Theatre’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 17:2 (1977), pp. 171–7, 172–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 See Momigliano, ‘Gibbon's Contribution to Historical Method’, p. 459.

61 Marshall, David, ‘Rousseau and the State of Theater’, Representations, 13:1 (1986), pp. 84–114, 84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Rousseau, Politics and the Arts, p. 22.

63 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. and introduction Cole, G. D. H. (London: Everyman, 1993 [1754]), pp. 95–6Google Scholar.

64 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘A Discourse on Political Economy’, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. and introduced Cole, G. D. H. (London: Everyman, 1993 [1755]), p. 147Google Scholar.

65 Hont, Istvan, ‘Free Trade and the Economic Limits to National Politics: Neo-Machiavellian Political Economy Reconsidered’, in Dunn, John (ed.), The Economic Limits to Modern Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 48Google Scholar.

66 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, trans. with preface, notes and an interpretative essay Butterworth, Charles E. (Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1992), p. 115Google Scholar.

67 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, ‘A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences’, in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. and introduced Cole, G. D. H. (London: Everyman, 1993 [1750]), p. 6Google Scholar.

68 McLendon, Michael Locke, ‘The Overvaluation of Talent: An Interpretation and Application of Rousseau's Amour-Propre’, Polity, 36:1 (2003), pp. 115–38, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

69 Barber, Benjamin, ‘Rousseau and the Paradoxes of the Dramatic Imagination’, Daedalus, 107:3 (1978), pp. 79–92, 79Google Scholar.

70 O'Brien, Narratives of Enlightenment, p. 5.

71 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, p. 75.

72 Costelloe, ‘The Theater of Morals’, p. 58.

73 Rousseau, Politics and the Arts, p. 57.

74 Rousseau, The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, p. 118.

75 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, pp. 86, 88.

76 Rosenblatt, Rousseau and Geneva, p. 127.

77 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Émile, Or Treatise on Education, trans. Foxley, Barbara (New York: BiblioBazaar, 2006 [1762]), p. 149Google Scholar.

78 Marks, Jonathan, ‘The Savage Pattern: The Unity of Rousseau's Thought Revisited’, Polity, 31:1 (1998), pp. 75–105, 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Rousseau, Émile, p. 562.

80 Marshall, ‘Rousseau and the State of Theater’, p. 85.

81 Hanley, Ryan, ‘Commerce and Corruption: Rousseau's Diagnosis and Adam Smith's Cure’, European Journal of Political Theory, 7:2 (2008), pp. 137–58, 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences’, p. 29.

83 Rousseau, Émile, p. 264.

84 McLendon, ‘The Overvaluation of Talent’, pp. 117–19.

85 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on Political Economy’, pp. 160–2.

86 Garrard, Graeme, Rousseau's Counter-Enlightenment: A Republican Critique of the Philosophes (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2003), p. 48Google Scholar.

87 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, p. 112.

88 Melville, Peter, ‘The Sleepy Carib: Rousing the ‘Native Informant’ in Rousseau’, European Romantic Review, 13:2 (2002), pp. 183–9, 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 Yousef, Nancy, ‘Savage or Solitary?: The Wild Child and Rousseau's Man of Nature’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 62:2 (2001), pp. 245–63, 263CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 Watson, Foundations of International Political Economy, pp. 101–8.

91 Dent, Nicholas, A Rousseau Dictionary (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), p. 29Google Scholar.

92 Smith, Adam, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, eds Raphael, David Daiches and Macfie, Alec from a composite of all seven editions (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund Press, 1982 [1759/1790]), I.iii.3.1Google Scholar.

93 Meek, Ronald, ‘New Light on Adam Smith's Glasgow Lectures on Jurisprudence’, History of Political Economy, 8:4 (1976), pp. 439–77, 440CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

94 Winch, Donald, Adam Smith's Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), p. 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.3.34.

96 Ibid., I.ii.3.4.

97 Ibid., V.2.13.

98 Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences’, p. 6.

99 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, V.2.3.

100 Schneider, Louis, ‘Adam Smith on Human Nature and Social Circumstance’, in O'Driscoll, Gerald (ed.), Adam Smith and Modern Political Economy: Bicentennial Essays on The Wealth of Nations (Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1979), p. 57Google Scholar.

101 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, IV.1.8.

102 I am grateful to one of the journal's anonymous referees for getting me to focus on this aspect of the argument.

103 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.2.

104 Harkin, ‘Adam Smith's Missing History’, p. 433.

105 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, VII.iv.6.

106 Banerjee, ‘Rousseau's Concept of Theater’, pp. 175–6.

107 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.6.

108 Ibid., I.iii.3.6.

109 Ibid., IV.1.6.

110 Ibid., IV.1.6, IV.1.10.

111 Ibid., IV.1.8.

112 Ibid., IV.1.8.

113 Ibid., IV.1.8.

114 Griswold, Charles, Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 165Google Scholar.

115 Rothschild, Economic Sentiments, p. 231.

116 Otteson, James, Adam Smith's Marketplace of Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 122–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

117 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.1.

118 Hanley, ‘Commerce and Corruption’, p. 144.

119 Pangle, Thomas, ‘The Classical and Modern Liberal Understandings of Honor’, in McNamara, Peter (ed.), The Noblest Minds: Fame, Honor, and the American Founding (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998), p. 211Google Scholar.

120 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.ii.intro.2, VI.iii.11.

121 Fleischacker, On Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, pp. 87–90.

122 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, III.2.1.

123 Ibid., III.2.4.

124 Ibid., III.2.7.

125 Ibid., III.2.32.

126 Rousseau, Émile, p. 265.

127 Force, Pierre, Self-Interest before Adam Smith: A Genealogy of Economic Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

128 Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I.iii.3.2.

129 Ibid., III.3.41.

130 Ibid., I.iii.3.2.

131 Ibid., III.3.41.

132 Ibid., IV.1.11.

133 Ibid., III.3.43.