Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:32:59.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Civilisations and harm: the politics of civilising processes between the West and the non-West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Alan Chong
Alan Chong*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Centre for Multilateralism Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Singapore
*
* Correspondence to: Alan Chong, Associate Professor, Centre for Multilateralism Studies, S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Block S4, Level B4, Nanyang Avenue 639798, Singapore. Author’s email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Andrew Linklater’s Violence and Civilization in the Western States-System is to be both praised and critiqued for opening spaces for discussing civilisational standards in the era of a globalising world. It offers a healthy provocation for inquiry into how non-Western states ought to comprehend the legacies of Western political evolution colouring existing ‘IR’ as a discipline. Linklater’s book inspires three thematic reactions: globalisation does bring harm; the notion of a universal civilisation remains open to debate; and the possibilities of civilising patterns in premodern Southeast Asia serving as supplementary mirrors and extensions of the relationship between violence and civilisation. It is suggested that Linklater’s sequel must consider the trajectory of non-Western sociologies of IR.

Keywords

Critical TheoryHistorical SociologyAsian IRPremodern International FormationsGlobal IR
Type
Forum: Linklater’s Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , October 2017 , pp. 637 - 653
Copyright
© British International Studies Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Linklater, Andrew, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press and Polity Press, 1998), p. 5 Google Scholar.

2 Linklater, Transformation of Political Community, p. 7.

3 Linklater, Andrew, Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), p. xi Google Scholar.

4 Linklater, Andrew, The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Ibid., p. 73.

6 Ibid.

7 Ibid.

8 See, for instance, Aydin, Cemil, Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007)Google Scholar and Mishra, Pankaj, From the Ruins of Empire: The Revolt against the West and the Remaking of Asia (New York: Picador, 2012)Google Scholar.

9 Mishra, From the Ruins of Empire, pp. 1–9.

10 Linklater, Violence and Civilization, p. 59.

11 Ibid., p. 296.

12 Waters, Malcolm, Globalization (London: Routledge, 1995), p. 3 Google Scholar.

13 Giddens, Anthony, The Consequences of Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990), p. 64 Google Scholar.

14 Thornton, A. P., Imperialism in the Twentieth Century (London: Macmillan, 1980), p. 62 Google Scholar.

15 One wonders if Nkrumah had intended this to be a sharp pun!

16 Nkrumah, Kwame, Consciencism: Philosophy and Ideology for Decolonization and Development with Particular Reference to the African Revolution (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1964), p. 2 Google Scholar.

17 Hobson, John, ‘The postcolonial paradox of Eastern agency’, in Pinar Bilgin and L. H. M. Ling (eds), Asia in International Relations: Unlearning Imperial Power Relations (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017), pp. 109–120 Google Scholar. The thesis of globalisation containing within it disguised strategies of power relations has only been examined in piecemeal fashion. These are some examples of this angle of critical inquiry: Spybey, Tony, Globalization and World Society (Oxford: Polity Press, 1996)Google Scholar; Bauman, Zygmunt, Globalization: The Human Consequences (Oxford: Polity, 1998)Google Scholar; Falk, Richard, Predatory Globalization: A Critique (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Held, David, McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David, and Perraton, Jonathan, Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Juillet, Luc, ‘Domestic institutions and non-state actors in international governance’, in Theodore H. Cohn, Stephen McBride, and John Wiseman (eds), Power in the Global Era: Grounding Globalization (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000), pp. 125–138 Google Scholar; Halperin, Sandra and Palan, Ronen (eds), Legacies of Empire: Imperial Roots of the Contemporary Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar.

18 Ritzer, George, The McDonaldization of Society (Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press, 2000), chs 3–6 Google Scholar.

19 Quoted in Linklater, Violence and Civilization, p. 261.

20 Ibid., pp. 313–16.

21 Pacey, Arnold, Technology in World Civilization: A Thousand-Year History (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1991), pp. 101–107 Google Scholar.

22 Ibid., pp. 64–8.

23 Ibid., p. 53.

24 Ibid.

25 Headrick, Daniel, Power over Peoples: Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

26 Nabil-i-Azam, , The Dawn-Breakers: Nabil’s Narrative of the Early Days of the Baha’i Revelation, trans. and ed. Shogi Effendi (New York: Baha’i Publishing Committee, 1932), p. 131, quoted in Headrick, Power over Peoples Google Scholar, pp. 178–9.

27 Bartelson, Jens, ‘Towards a genealogy of “society” in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 41:4 (2015), pp. 657–692 Google Scholar; Weber, Martin, ‘On the history and politics of the social turn’, Review of International Studies, 41:4 (2015), pp. 693–714 Google Scholar.

28 Linklater, Violence and Civilization, p. 9, emphasis added.

29 Elias, Norbert, The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, trans. Edmund Jephcott, eds Eric Dunning, Johan Goudsblom, and Stephen Mennell (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2000), p. 5 Google Scholar.

30 Ibid., p. 5, emphasis added.

31 Ibid., p. 6.

32 Reid, Anthony, Charting the Shape of Early Modern Southeast Asia (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 1999), pp. 1–7 Google Scholar.

33 Emmerson, Donald K., ‘“Southeast Asia”: What’s in a name?’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 15:1 (1984), pp. 1–21 Google Scholar.

34 Lorge, Peter A., The Asian Military Revolution: From Gunpowder to the Bomb (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

35 Sejarah Melayu [Malay Annals], trans. C. C. Brown, intro. Roolvink, R. (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1970), p. 2 Google Scholar. (Hereafter Sejarah [Brown translation]).

36 Wolters, O. W., History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives (2nd edn, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2004), p. 113 Google Scholar.

37 Ibid., p. 113.

38 Coedès, George, The Indianized States of Southeast Asia, ed. Walter F. Vella, trans. Susan B. Cowing (Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1968), pp. 21–22 Google Scholar.

39 Ibid., pp. 23–6.

40 Norene Shaffer, Lynda, Maritime Southeast Asia, 300 B.C. to A.D. 1528 (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015), pp. 37–43 Google Scholar.

41 Reid, Anthony, ‘Islamization and Christianization in Southeast Asia: the critical phase, 1550–1650’, in Anthony Reid (eds), Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power and Belief (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 151–179 Google Scholar.

42 Miles, Douglas, ‘Shamanism and the conversion of Bagdju Dayaks’, Oceania, 37:1 (1966), p. 5 quoted in Reid, ‘Islamization and Christianization in Southeast Asia’, p. 160Google Scholar.

43 Duarte, Diego, ‘Historia de la Provincia del Sancto Rosario … en Philipinas’ [1640], in E. H. Blair and J. A. Robertson (eds), The Philippine Islands, 1493–1898, Volume 30 (Cleveland: Arthur H. Clarke, 1903-9), p. 238 Google Scholar.

44 Reid, ‘Islamization and Christianization in Southeast Asia’, pp. 178–9.

45 Reid, ‘Islamization and Christianization in Southeast Asia’, p. 156.

46 Hikayat Patani: The Story of Patani, eds A. Teeuw and D. K. Wyatt, 2 vols (The Hague: Koninklijk Instituut, 1970), 1:75, 78–9, quoted in Reid, ‘Islamization and Christianization in Southeast Asia’, p. 156.

47 Shamsul, A. B., ‘A history of an identity, an identity of a history: the idea and practice of “Malayness” in Malaysia reconsidered’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 32:3 (2001), pp. 355–366 Google Scholar.

48 Chong, Alan, ‘Premodern Southeast Asia as a guide to international relations between peoples: Prowess and prestige in “intersocietal relations” in the Sejarah Melayu ’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 37:2 (2012), pp. 87–105 Google Scholar.

49 Sejarah [Brown translation], p. 87.

50 Chong, ‘Prowess and prestige’, pp. 97–9.

51 Sejarah [Brown translation], p. 16.

52 Chong, ‘Prowess and prestige’, p. 100.

53 See, for instance, Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry (eds), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2010)Google Scholar.

54 Linklater, Violence and Civilization, p. 379.

55 See fn. 51.

56 Linklater, Violence and Civilization, p. 471.

57 My position associates with the tone of Ling, L. H. M., ‘Introduction: Learning anew: Asia in IR and world politics’, in Pinar Bilgin and L. H. M. Ling (eds), Asia in International Relations: Unlearning Imperial Power Relations (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017), pp. 1–10 Google Scholar.