Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:22:56.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Articulating an alternative: the contribution of John Burton

Review products

BurtonJohn, DukesFrank, and MasonGeorge, Conflict: Resolution and Provention, Basingstoke and London, Macmillan, 1990 (hereafter CRP)

BurtonJohn (ed.), Conflict: Human Needs Theory, Basingstoke and London, Macmillan, 1990 (hereafter CHNT)

BurtonJohn and DukesFrank (eds.), Conflict: Readings in Management and Resolution, Basingstoke and London, Macmillan, 1990 (hereafter CRMR)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Extract

Taken together, these four volumes comprise the Conflict Series, and represent the fruits of work completed by John Burton, with others, in the last years of his formal academic career in the United States, at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington, DC, and at the Center for Conflict Resolution at George Mason University in Virginia. Burton has now ‘retired’ (though he still writes vigorously) to his native Australia, and that event, together with the appearance of these works, prompts this synoptic evaluation of them in the context of Burton's life and previous work. What makes this particularly interesting in the case of John Burton is that his career has been less than singular; first a civil servant, then a diplomat, then an academic, he moved from Australia, then to the United Kingdom and thence to the United States, with various stops along the way. Though he has written a great deal—books, articles and conference papers—and was a key participant in the organization of the peace research movement in the 1960s, especially the International Peace Research Association and the Conflict Research Society in the United Kingdom (and is described on the back cover of CRP as ‘the founder of the field of conflict resolution’), he was never a professor during his extended residence i n the United Kingdom at, first, University College, London, and then at the University of Kent, achieving that status only later, at George Mason University.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a discussion of Bull and Burton together, see Jones, R., ‘Antipodean Antinomies’, in Political Studies, vol. 34 (1986), pp. 149–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Groom, A. J. R. and Olson, W. C., International Relations Then and Now (London, 1991), p. 139Google Scholar.

3 Lederer, K. (ed.), Human Needs (Cambridge, MA, 1980)Google Scholar.

4 Banks, M. H., Conflict in World Society (Brighton, 1984), p. xiiGoogle Scholar.

5 Brent, J., Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life (Bloomington, 1993)Google Scholar; Griffin, D. R., Founders of Constructive Postmodern Philosophy (Albany, 1993)Google Scholar.

6 Dryzek, J., Discursive Democracy (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar.

7 Dryzek, Discursive Democracy, pp. 3–4.

8 Burton, J. W. and Vayrynen, R., ‘The End of International Relations?’, in Groom, A. J. R. and Light, M. (eds.), Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory (London, 1994), p. 75Google Scholar.