Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 1985
Most commentators on the 1949 sterling crisis have viewed it as an episode with implications merely for the management of the British economy. This paper, based on the public records now available, discusses the impact of the crisis on British economic foreign policy. In particular it suggests that the crisis revealed deep Anglo-American differences, centring on the nature of the Marshall Plan, on the international value of the sterling area, and on the proper relationship between the United Kingdom and Western Europe, Ultimately the British succeeded in resolving these disagreements: but this triumph ironically implied both the defeat of British aims in post-war European reconstruction and a long term delusion that great power status could be maintained on the basis of a special relationship-with the United States.
1. See for example Alec Caimcross, ‘The 1949 Devaluation of Sterling’, in Cairncross, Alec and Eichengreen, Barry, Sterling in Decline: the Devaluations of 1949 and 1967 (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
2. Triffin, Robert, The World Money Maze (New Haven, 1966), p. 400.Google Scholar
3. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1947, Volume III (hereafter FRUS), pp. 276–83.Google Scholar Summary of a meeting on 25 June 1947.
4. See Milward, Alan S., War, Economy and Society 1939–1945 (1977), p. 355.Google Scholar
5. PRO T 229/136, memorandum by R. W. B. Clarke, 15 July 1947. See also Newton, C. C. S., ‘The Sterling Crisis of 1947 and the British Response to the Marshall Plan’, Economic History Review, 2nd ser. xxxvii (1984), pp. 91–118.Google Scholar
6. Organization for European Economic Co–operation.
7. See Newton, C. C. S., ‘Britain, the Dollar Shortage, and European Integration, 1945–1950’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, 1982, chapter VI.Google Scholar
8. ECA, Recovery Guides, No. 9, 06 1949, p. 4.Google Scholar
9. Gordon, Robert Aaron, Business Fluctuations (New York, 1964), pp. 477–8.Google Scholar
10. Ibid., p. 478.
11. United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe (hereafter UN, ECE), Economic Survey of Europe in 1949 (Geneva, 1950), p. 143.Google Scholar
12. ECA, Recovery Guides, No. 10, 09 1949, p. 4.Google Scholar
13. Zupnick, Elliot, Britain's Postwar Dollar Problem (New York, 1957), p. 111.Google Scholar
14. The Economist, 3 09 1949, pp. 515–17, ‘The Sterling Balances’.Google Scholar
15. UN, ECE, Economic Survey of Europe in 1949, p. 134.
16. ECA, The Sterling Area: An American Analysis (Washington, 1951), pp. 638–9.Google Scholar
17. FRUS, 1949, III, p. 377, Hoffman to Harriman, 17 March 1949.
18. Ibid., and see FRUS, 1949, III, p. 379, Webb, James(Acting Secretary of State), to Lewis Douglas (United States Ambassador in London), 28 05 1949.Google Scholar
19. See for example PRO FO 371/25577, UE 2133/150/53, Sir Stafford Cripps to Sir Oliver Franks, 6 April 1949.
20. See Newton, C. C. S., ‘Britain, the Dollar Shortage, and European Integration’, p. 255.Google Scholar
21. Joyce, and Kolko, Gabriel, The Limits of Power (New York, 1972), p. 464.Google Scholar
22. PRO CAB 129/37, C.P. (49) 228, ‘Economic Report’, 4 November 1949.
23. For a more detailed discussion of American attempts to liberalize European payments arrangements in 1949 see Newton, C. C. S., ‘Britain, the Dollar Shortage, and European Integration’, pp. 248–59.Google Scholar
24. Williams, Philip, Hugh Gaitskell (London, 1979), p. 195.Google Scholar
25. PRO FO 371/75578, UE 3830/150/53, Minute by R. W. B. Clarke, 16 June. 1949.
26. PRO CAB 134/220, E.P.C. (49) 27th Meeting, 7 July 1949.
27. PRO CAB 134/222, E.P.C. (49) 73, Memorandum by Cripps, 7 July 1949.
28. For records of the Cripps–Snyder meetings see PRO FO 371/7559, passim.
29. FRUS, 1949, III, pp. 801–2, Snyder to Acheson, 10 July 1949.
31. Jay, Douglas, Change and Fortune (1980), p. 186.Google Scholar
31. PRO CAB 128/16, CM. (49) 48th Conclusions, 28 July 1949.
32. Hamby, Alonzo L., Beyond the New Deal: Harry S. Truman and American Liberalism (New York, 1973), pp. 331–2.Google Scholar
33. PRO FO 371/75590, UE 5984/150/53, Franks to Bevin, 19 September 1949.
34. See Newton, C. C. S., ‘Britain, the Dollar Shortage, and European Integration’, pp. 275–7.Google Scholar
35. PRO FO 371/75586, UE 5578/150/53, minute by Sir Roger Makins t o Bevin, 29 August 1949.
36. McLellan, David, Dean Acheson, The State Department Years (New York, 1976), p. 242.Google Scholar
37. After Hervé Alphand, head of the Economic Section of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
38. On cross rates see PRO FO 371/75590, UE 5980/150/53, minute by K. R. C. Pridham, 21 September 1949; on exclusion see PRO FO 371/78103, UE 10095/306/98, letter from Eric Berthond to Roger Makins, 1 October 1949.
39. See PRO CAB 134/221, E.P.C. (49) 6, 25 January 1949.
40. PRO CAB 129/37, CP (49) 203, joint memorandum by Bevin and Cripps, ‘Proposals for the Economic Unification of Europe’.
41. See Newton, C. C. S., ‘Britain, the Dollar Shortage, and European Integration, 1945–1950’, pp. 284–6.Google Scholar
42. PRO FO 371/78104, UR 11088/306/98, Acheson to Bevin, 25 October 1949.
43. See FRUS, 1950, Volume III, p. 893Google Scholar, bilateral Anglo–American meeting of 1 May 1950.
44. Cairncross, Alec, ‘The 1949 Devaluation of Sterling’, pp. 142–55Google Scholar, in Cairncross, Alec and Eichengreen, Barry, Sterling in Decline: the Devaluations of 1931, 1949 and 1967 (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
45. Milward, Alan S., The Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1945–1951 (London, 1984), pp. 294–5.Google Scholar
46. See Newton, C. C. S., ‘The Sterling Crisis of 1947 and the British Response to the Marshall Plan’, Economic History Review, 08 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. See Strange, Susan, Sterling and British Policy (Oxford, 1971).Google Scholar