Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:06:27.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wholesale produce auctions and regional food systems: The case of Seneca produce auction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2018

Judson Reid ,
Derek Simmonds  and
Elizabeth Newbold
Judson Reid*
Affiliation:
Cornell University Cooperative Extension, 417 Liberty St, Penn Yan, NY 14527, USA
Derek Simmonds
Affiliation:
Cornell Cooperative Extension Seneca County, 9 E Main St #308, Waterloo, NY 13165, USA
Elizabeth Newbold
Affiliation:
Northeast Center to Advance Food Safety, University of Vermont Extension, P.O. Box 559, Bennington, VT 05201, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Judson Reid, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Produce auctions are local aggregation points that facilitate access for small-scale fruit, flower and vegetable farmers to wholesale buyers from a broader geography. Buyers purchase lots from multiple farmers to fulfill wholesale demand and then retail the product to the consumers. Sales are held multiple times per week to create a consistent supply for buyers and a regular market for the farmers. With over 70 produce auctions located in eastern North America, this is a growing trend of intermediated markets. Currently, there are six active produce auctions in New York State, with two more in planning stages. Produce auctions have a positive economic impact on the communities in which they are located, as well as on those who sell and/or buy at the auction. Community values inherent to these populations contribute to the success of produce auctions as an intermediated market. As the auction market channel continues to grow, buyer and consumer education on the benefits of local auctions is important. As these auctions are based in horse-and-buggy communities, extension education needs to be tailored to Amish and Mennonite populations. Auction houses, as well as farmers, will need to stay current with federal food safety regulations and market-based requirements to remain competitive.

Keywords

Amishlocal producemarketingMennoniteproduce auctionwholesale
Type
Themed Content: Intermediated Marketing Channels in Regional Food Systems
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 34 , Special Issue 3: Themed Content: Intermediated Marketing Channels in Regional Food Systems , June 2019 , pp. 259 - 267
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergefurd, B (2011) Assessing Extension Needs of Ohio's Amish and Mennonite Produce Auction Farmers. MS. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Johnson, R, Fraser, E and Hawkins, R (2016) Overcoming barriers to scaling Up sustainable alternative food systems: A comparative case study of two Ontario-based wholesale produce auctions. Sustainability, [online] 8(328), 1–16. Available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040328 (Accessed 23 May 2017).Google Scholar
Lockeretz, W (1986) Urban consumers’ attitudes towards locally grown produce. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 1(2), 83–88.Google Scholar
McEhelny, V (1916) The economic value of the auction as a distributor of perishable commodities. In 2nd Pan-American Scientific Congress. Washington, DC: American Fruit and Produce Auction Association, pp. 1–19. Available at http://www.archive.org/cletails/cu31924013947324 (Accessed 23 May 2017).Google Scholar
Miller, A and Hauck, C (1925) American Fruit and Produce Auctions, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Department Bulletin No. 1362. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Pena, S (1996) Produce auction produces results. Eastern Pennsylvania Business Journal, 7(16), 1.Google Scholar
Reid, J (2015) Old order Mennonites in New York: Cultural and agricultural growth. Journal of Amish and Plain Anabaptist Studies 3(2), 212–221.Google Scholar
Shonkwiler, K (2014) Circle Letters, Produce Auctions, and Softball Games: Investigating the Internal Dynamics of the Old Order Migration Process. MA. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Tourte, L and Gaskell, M (2004) Horticultural auction markets: Linking small farms with consumer demand. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, [online] 19(3), 129–134. Available at https://doi.org/10.1079/RAFS200475 (Accessed 23 May 2017).Google Scholar
Tubene, S and Hanson, J (2002) The wholesale produce auction: An alternative marketing strategy for small farms. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17, 18–23.Google Scholar
Vekaufhause, G (2003) Information Regarding Produce Auctions From New York To Wisconsin. Sugarcreek: Schlabach Printers, pp 1–31.Google Scholar
Yoder, R, Schrock, L, Yoder, B and Yoder, A (2015). Directory of Produce Auctions and Co-Ops. Sugarcreek: Schlabach Printers, pp. 1–73.Google Scholar
Young Center for Anabaptist and Pietist Studies, Elizabethtown College (2016) Amish Population by State/Province, 2016. [Online] Available at http://groups.etown.edu/amishstudies/statistics/population-by-state/ (Accessed 23 May 2017).Google Scholar