Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:40:56.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed suppression with hydramulch, a biodegradable liquid paper mulch in development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2007

J.P. Warnick ,
C.A. Chase ,
E.N. Rosskopf ,
E.H. Simonne ,
J.M. Scholberg ,
R.L. Koenig  and
N.E. Roe
J.P. Warnick
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1301 Fifield Hall, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690, USA.
C.A. Chase*
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1301 Fifield Hall, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690, USA.
E.N. Rosskopf
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, USHRL, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945, USA.
E.H. Simonne
Affiliation:
Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, 1301 Fifield Hall, PO Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611-0690, USA.
J.M. Scholberg
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, PO Box 110500, Gainesville, FL 32611-0500, USA.
R.L. Koenig
Affiliation:
Rosie's Organic Farm, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA.
N.E. Roe
Affiliation:
Farming Systems Research, Inc., Boynton Beach, FL 33437, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cost-effective, laborsaving, and environmentally sound weed management practices are needed for sustainable vegetable production. Organic production, in particular, precludes the use of synthetic herbicides and requires that organic farmers utilize practices that reduce harmful environmental impact. Although polyethylene film mulch is used extensively in vegetable production in Florida, its use has a number of drawbacks, among which is the susceptibility of opaque polyethylene mulch to penetration by yellow and purple nutsedge. Appreciable labor and disposal/environmental costs are associated with its removal. A durable mulch material that would effectively control nutsedge and other weeds but with no associated environmental and disposal costs is highly desirable. Hydramulch, a paper-like material applied as a slurry consisting of cotton waste, newsprint, gypsum and a proprietary adhesive, was tested as a biodegradable alternative to polyethylene mulch during the spring of 2003. Experiments were conducted in southeastern and north-central Florida to compare the effects of three hydramulch formulations, polyethylene mulch and a no mulch control on soil temperature, soil moisture and weed infestation. Soil temperature under hydramulch was 1–4°C lower than that under polyethylene. In the absence of rain, the use of hydramulch resulted in soil moisture levels that were 1–4% lower than with polyethylene mulch. Higher soil moisture with hydramulch than polyethylene was coincident with rainfall. Hydramulch remained intact on most beds and suppressed broadleaf weeds and grasses, particularly at the north-central site where the mulch was applied at a greater thickness. However, purple nutsedge readily penetrated hydramulch. Therefore, hydramulch may be applicable for use for the suppression of broadleaf weeds and grasses at sites with little or no nutsedge pressure in fall or in crops for which cooler soils are desirable or crops that are rainfed or overhead irrigated.

Keywords

hydramulchbiodegradablemulchorganicweed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 216 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Walz, E. 1999. Final results of the biennial national organic farmers' survey. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA. Available at Web site http://www.ofrf.org/publications/survey/Final.Results.Third.NOF.Survey.pdf (verified 5 April 2005).Google Scholar
2 Majek, B.A. and Neary, P.E. 1991. Selective wavelength transmitting mulch for yellow nutsedge control. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference—Weeds. British Crop Protection Council, Surrey, UK. p. 263–268.Google Scholar
3 Maynard, D.N. and Hochmuch, G.J. 1997. Knott's Handbook for Vegetable Growers. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4 Shogren, R.L. 2000. Biodegradable mulches from renewable resources. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 16:33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Anderson, D.F., Garisto, M.A., Bourrut, J.C., Schonbeck, M.W., Jaye, R., Wurzberger, A., and DeGregorio, R. 1995. Evaluation of a paper mulch made from recycled materials as an alternative to plastic film mulch for vegetables. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 7:39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Shogren, R.L. and Hochmuth, R.C. 2004. Field evaluation of watermelon grown on paper-polymerized vegetable oil mulches. HortScience 39:1588–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Raloff, J. 2002. Toxic runoff from plastic mulch. Science News 158:221.Google Scholar
8 Rice, P.J, McConnell, L.L., Heighton, L.P., Sadeghi, A.M., Isensee, A.R., Teasdale, J.R., Abdul-Baki, A.A., Harman-Fetcho, J.A., and Hapeman, C.J. 2001. Runoff loss of pesticides and soil: A comparison between vegetative mulch and plastic mulch in vegetable production systems. Journal of Environmental Quality 30:1808–1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Ozone Depletion Rules and Regulations. Methyl Bromide. Available at Web site http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/qa.html#q3 (verified 30 March 2004).Google Scholar
10 Rosskopf, E.N., Chellemi, D.O., Charudattan, R., and Chandramohan, S. 2000. Alternatives to methyl bromide for weed control. Acta Horticulturae 532:103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Chase, C.A., Sinclair, T.R., Shilling, D.G., Gilreath, J.P., and Locascio, S.J. 1998. Light effects on rhizome morphogenesis in nutsedges (Cyperus spp.): implications for control by soil solarization. Weed Science 46:575–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Patterson, D.T. 1998. Suppression of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) with polyethylene film mulch. Weed Technology 12:275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Schonbeck, M.W. and Evanylo, G.K. 1998. Effects of mulches on soil properties and tomato production 1: soil temperature, soil moisture and marketable yield. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 13:55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Brault, D., Stewart, K.A., and Jenni, S. 2002. Growth, development, and yield of head lettuce cultivated on paper and polyethylene mulch. HortScience 37:92–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15 Weber, C.A. 2003. Biodegradable mulch films for weed suppression in the establishment year of matted-row strawberries. HortTechnology 13:665–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Masiunas, J., Wahle, E., Barmore, L., and Morgan, A. 2003. A foam mulching system to control weeds in tomatoes and sweet basil. HortTechnology 13:324–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17 Liburd, O., Casagrande, R., and Alm, S. 1998. Evaluation of various color hydromulches and weed fabric on broccoli insect populations. Journal of Economic Entomology 91:256–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Gilbert, R.A., Rice, R.W., and Lentini, R.S. 2002. Characterization of selected mineral soils used for sugarcane production. SS-AGR-227. Florida Cooperative Extension, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Available at Web site http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu (verified 22 February 2004).Google Scholar
19 Carlisle, V.M., Collins, M.E., Sodek, F., Hammond, L.C., and Harris, W.G. 1989. Characterization data for selected Florida soils. Soil Science Research Report 89-1. University of Florida. Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
20 Littell, R.C., Freund, R.J., and Spector, P.C. 1991. SAS System for Linear Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
21 Diaz-Perez, J.C. and Batal, K.D. 2002. Colored plastic film mulches affect tomato growth and yield via changes in root-zone temperature. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 127:127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Ashworth, S. and Harrison, H. 1983. Evaluation of mulches for use in the home garden. HortScience 18:180–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Clarkson, V.A. 1960. Effect of black polyethylene mulch on soil and microclimate temperature and nitrate level. Agronomy Journal 52:307–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Hemphill, D.D. Jr and Crabtree, G.D. 1988. Growth response and weed control in slicing cucumbers under row covers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 113:41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Ham, J.M., Kluitenberg, G.J., and Lamont, W.J. 1993. Optical properties of plastic mulches affect the field temperature regime. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 118:188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Hanna, H.Y., Millhollon, E.P., Herrick, J.K., and Fletcher, C.L. 1997. Increased yield of heat-tolerant tomatoes with deep transplanting, morning irrigation, and white mulch. HortScience 32:224–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Monks, C.D., Monks, D.W., Basden, T., Selders, A., Poland, S., and Rayburn, E. 1997. Soil temperature, soil moisture, weed control, and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) response to mulching. Weed Technology 11:561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Johnson, J.M., Hough-Goldstein, J.A., and Vangessel, M. 2004. Effects of straw mulch on pest insects, predators, and weeds in watermelons and potatoes. Environmental Entomology 33:1632–1643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar