Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:42:51.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Urban organic farming in Austria with the concept of Selbsternte (’self-harvest‘): An agronomic and socio-economic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Christian R. Vogl*
Affiliation:
Institute for Organic Farming, University for Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria.
Paul Axmann
Affiliation:
Institute for Organic Farming, University for Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria.
Brigitte Vogl-Lukasser
Affiliation:
Institute for Organic Farming, University for Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

In Vienna, consultants, organic farmers and green-minded consumers have developed a new concept of urban organic farming, called Selbsternte (’self-harvest‘). Organic farmers prepare a plot of arable land (the Selbsternte plot) and sow or plant rows composed of 18–23 plant species. In mid-May the plots are divided into subplots that contain 2–6 m of every sown species and are rented to so-called self-harvesters for a period of about 136 days. In 2002 Selbsternte was being practiced at 15 plots in Vienna or in neighboring cities, represented by 861 subplots, with a total area of 68,740 m2, and managed by 12 organic farmers for 861 registered self-harvesters. At the Roter Berg plot, experimental subplots were established to evaluate yields and the value of the harvested produce, and interviews were conducted with 27 self-harvesters, the eight Selbsternte farmers and one Selbsternte consultant. The experimental subplots were managed in two different ways, namely, ’with low intensity‘ (LIS) and ’with high intensity‘ (HIS; meaning additional harrowing, mulching and sowing of additional plants). At the LIS 24.2 h and at the HIS 38.9 h of work were invested over 51 days. Monetary investment was US$184 for the LIS and US$259 for the HIS subplots. The total harvest of fresh produce was: 163 kg subplot–1 for LIS and 208 kg subplot–1 for HIS subplots. The total value of the harvest at the HIS was US$364 for conventional and US$766 for organic prices. All self-harvesters saw the rental of a subplot and the work as an activity of leisure. More than half of the self-harvesters reported ’trying something new‘ at their subplots. The most frequently mentioned innovation for them was growing an unknown species. Twenty-five self-harvesters sowed 54 different, additional plant species. The motivating factors in establishing Selbsternte plots, as reported by all the farmers, were, primarily, better relations with consumers and work diversification, and only then were economic factors a consideration. The contribution of Selbsternte to income varied at the farms, being between 0 and 30% of the total farm income. As a main success factor, all of the farmers reported a close relationship between the self-harvesters and the farmers. Selbsternte subplots can be understood as small experimental stations where self-harvesters merge traditional horticultural techniques with urban ideas on permaculture, sustainable land use and participatory farming. Selbsternte has potential value for the improvement of urban agriculture, but also for the development of organic farming in general.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Bakker, N., Dubbeling, M., Gündel, S., Sabel-Koschella, U., and Zeeuw, H.d. (eds). 2000. Growing Cities, Growing Food–Urban Agriculture on the Policy Agenda. German Foundation for International Development, Feldafing, Germany.Google Scholar
2Mougeot, L.J.A. 2000. Urban agriculture–definition, presence, potentials and risks. In Bakker, N., Dubbeling, M., Gündel, S., Sabel-Koschella, U., and Zeeuw, H.d. (eds). Growing Cities, Growing Food. German Foundation for International Development, Feldafing, Germany. p. 142.Google Scholar
3Smit, J., Ratta, A., and Nasr, J. 1996. Urban Agriculture: Food, Jobs and Sustainable Cities. United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA.Google Scholar
4Moustier, P. 1996. Organisation in the Brazzaville vegetable market. PhD thesis, University of London, UK.Google Scholar
5Armar-Klemesu, M. 2000. Urban agriculture and food security, nutrition and health. In Bakker, N., Dubbeling, M., Gündel, S., Sabel-Koschella, U., and Zeeuw, H.d. (eds). Growing Cities, Growing Food. German Foundation for International Development, Feldafing, Germany. p.99117.Google Scholar
6Deelstra, T. and Girardet, H. 2000. Urban agriculture and sustainable cities. In Bakker, N., Dubbeling, M., Gündel, S., Sabel-Koschella, U., and Zeeuw, H.d. (eds). Growing Cities, Growing Food. German Foundation for International Development, Feldafing, Germany. p. 4365.Google Scholar
7Grünsteidel, I. 2000. Community Gardens–Grüne Oasen in den Ghettos von New York. In Meyer-Renschhausen, E. and Holl, A. (eds). Die Wiederkehr der Gärten. Studienverlag, Innsbruck, Austria. p. 125139.Google Scholar
8Gröning, G. 2000. Kampfesmutige Laubenpieper–Kleingärten und Politk in Berlin zwischen 1985 und 1995. In Meyer-Renschhausen, E. and Holl, A. (eds). Die Wiederkehr der Gärten. Studienverlag, Innsbruck, Austria. p. 140161.Google Scholar
9Akemine, T. and Pestemer, R. 2002. Die Selbstversorgungs-Guerilla in Japan. In Meyer-Renschhausen, E., Müller, R., and Becker, P. (eds). Die Gärten der Frauen–Zur sozialen Bedeutung von Kleinstlandwirtschaft in Stadt und Land weltweit. Centaurus, Herbolzheim, Germany. p. 178188.Google Scholar
10Garnett, T. 2000. Urban agriculture in London: rethinking our food economy. In Bakker, N., Dubbeling, M., Gündel, S., Sabel-Koschella, U., and Zeeuw, H.d. (eds). Growing Cities, Growing Food. German Foundation for International Development, Feldafing, Germany. p.477500.Google Scholar
11Galanti, G. 2002. Integrating ecological practices into urban garden management in developing countries. Urban Agriculture Magazine 6: 1516.Google Scholar
12Van Hirtum, M., Goewie, E., Getachew, Y., and Van Veenhuizen, R. 2002. Transition to ecological urban agriculture–a challenge. Urban Agriculture Magazine 6: 13.Google Scholar
13Böhnhardt, J., Fennekohl, K., Engelhardt, H., Winnicki, T., and Hess, J. 1999. Gemüse selbst ernten. University of Kassel, Kassel-Witzenhausen, Germany.Google Scholar
14Wortmann, A. 2000. Gemüse selbst ernten auf der Domäne Frankenhausen: Ein Beitrag zum nachhaltigen Konsum. Masters thesis, University of Kassel, Kassel-Witzenhausen, Germany.Google Scholar
15Bernard, H.R. 2002. Research Methods in Anthropology–Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, California, USA.Google Scholar