Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:19:59.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding consumer choices for Ontario produce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Steven Dukeshire*
Affiliation:
Department of Business and Social Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Oliver Masakure
Affiliation:
School of Business and Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford, Ontario, Canada.
Julio Mendoza
Affiliation:
Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Bev Holmes
Affiliation:
Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Nathan Murray
Affiliation:
Department of Business and Social Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

Research has demonstrated growing public interest in local food and that this interest is driven by a number of factors including supporting local farmers, reducing the distance food travels, sustaining the environment, and food safety and quality. However, there has been very little research relating factors to actual purchase behavior. This study begins to fill that gap by relating consumer beliefs and values toward local foods with activities that support local foods as well as the actual purchase behavior for 22 fresh produce items. Data were collected through an Ontario-wide, web-based survey that is part of a longitudinal panel regarding food issues. Results from 1879 completed surveys indicated consumers had positive perceptions of local food and felt responsible for buying local, but also experienced barriers when trying to do so. Positive perceptions toward local food and a greater sense of personal responsibility to buy local were positively associated and higher barriers negatively associated with the likelihood of engaging in activities related to supporting local food as well as buying fresh produce items that were produced in Ontario. Implications of these findings are discussed in the context that consumers seem to have an overall orientation or schema to buying local in general, rather than a highly specific schema directed to one or a few particular products.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Canadian Co-operative Association. 2008. Local Food Initiatives in Canada–An Overview and Policy Recommendations. Canadian Co-operative Association, Canada.Google Scholar
2 Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA). 2013. Pick Ontario freshness. Available at Web site http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/about/pickontario (accessed May 2013).Google Scholar
3 Select Nova Scotia. 2013. Available at Web site http// www.selectnovascotia.ca (accessed June 12, 2014).Google Scholar
4 Smithers, J., Lamarche, J., and Joseph, A.E. 2008. Unpacking the terms of engagement with local food at the farmers' market: Insights from Ontario. Journal of Rural Studies 24:337350.Google Scholar
5 Feagan, R. and Henderson, A. 2009. Devon acres CSA: Local struggles in a global food system. Agriculture and Human Values 26:203217.Google Scholar
6 Feagan, R., Morris, D., and Krug, K. 2004. Niagara region farmers' markets: Local food systems and sustainability considerations. Local Environment 9:235254.Google Scholar
7 Cox, R., Holloway, L., Venn, L., Dowler, L., Hein, J.R., Kneafsey, M. and Tuomainen, H. 2008. Common ground? Motivations for participation in a community-supported agriculture scheme. Local Environment 13:203218.Google Scholar
8 Donald, B. 2009. From Kraft to Craft: Innovation and Creativity in Ontario's Food Economy. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
9 Baker, K.E. 2011. Understanding the local food phenomenon: Academic discourse, analytical concepts, and an investigation of local food initiatives. Vis-à-vis: Explorations in Anthropology 11:324.Google Scholar
10 Larson, R.B. 1998. Regionality of food consumption. Agribusiness: An international Journal 14:213226.Google Scholar
11 Schneider, M.L. and Francis, C.A. 2005. Marketing locally produced foods: Consumer and farmer opinions in Washington County, Nebraska. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20:252260.Google Scholar
12 Durham, C.A., Roheim, C.A., and King, R.P. 2009. Consumer definitions of ‘locally grown’ for fresh fruits and vegetables. Journal of Food Distribution Research 40:5662.Google Scholar
13 Hand, M.S. and Martinez, S. 2010. Just what does local mean? Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues 25:36.Google Scholar
14 Clancy, K. and Ruhf, K. 2010. Is local enough? Some arguments for regional food systems. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues 25:3640.Google Scholar
15 Onozaka, Y., Nurse, G., and McFadden, D.T. 2010. Local food consumers: How motivations and perceptions translate to buying behavior. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues 25:712.Google Scholar
16 Thilmany, D., Bond, C.A., and Bond, J.K. 2008. Going local: Exploring consumer behavior and motivations for direct food purchases. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90:13031309.Google Scholar
17 Onken, K.A. and Bernard, J.C. 2010. Catching the ‘local’ bug: A look at state agricultural marketing programs. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues 25:2430.Google Scholar
18 Hardesty, S.D. 2010. Do government policies grow local food? Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues 25:3135.Google Scholar
19 Loureiro, M. and Hine, S. 2002. Discovering niche markets: A comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado grown), organic and GMO-free products. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 34:477487.Google Scholar
20 Giraud, K.L., Bond, J.J., and Bond, C.A. 2005. Consumer preferences for locally made specialty food products across northern New England. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 34:204216.Google Scholar
21 Carpio, C.E. and Isengildina-Massa, O. 2009. Consumer willingness to pay for locally grown products: The case of South Carolina. Agribusiness: An International Journal 25:412426.Google Scholar
22 Darby, K., Roe, B., Ernst, S., and Batte, M.T. 2008. Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis of locally produced foods [electronic resource]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90:476486.Google Scholar
23 Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, C.R., and Sitz, B.M. 2003. Country-of-origin labeling of beef products: US consumers' perceptions. Journal of Food Distribution Research 34:103116.Google Scholar
24 Toler, S., Briggeman, B.C., Lusk, J.L., and Adams, D.C. 2009. Fairness, farmers markets, and local production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91:12721278.Google Scholar
25 Lusk, J.L., Foster, K., and Nilsson, T. 2007. Public preferences and private choices: Effect of altruism and free riding on demand for environmentally certified pork. Environmental and Resource Economics 36:499521.Google Scholar
26 Umberger, W.J., Thilmany McFadden, D.D., and Smith, A.R. 2009. Does altruism play a role in determining U.S. consumer preferences and willingness to pay for natural and regionally produced beef? Agribusiness: An International Journal 25:268285.Google Scholar
27 Lusk, J.L. and Briggeman, B.C. 2011. Selfishness, altruism, and inequality aversion toward consumers and farmers. Agricultural Economics 42:121139.Google Scholar
28 Chang, J.B. and Lusk, J.L. 2009. Fairness and food choice. Food Policy 34:483491.Google Scholar
29 Roininen, K., Arvola, A., and Lähteenmäki, L. 2006. Exploring consumers' perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association. Food Quality and Preference 17:2030.Google Scholar
30 Selfa, T. and Qazi, J. 2005. Place, taste, or face-to-face? Understanding producer-consumer networks in ‘local’ food systems in Washington State. Agriculture and Human Values 22:451464.Google Scholar
31 Stephenson, G. and Lev, L. 2004. Common support for local agriculture in two contrasting Oregon communities. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:210–207.Google Scholar
32 Chambers, S., Harvey, K., Traill, W.B., Lobb, A., and Butler, L. 2007. Local, national and imported foods: A qualitative study. Appetite 49:208213.Google Scholar
33 Dukeshire, S., Garbes, R., Kennedy, C., Boudreau, A., and Osborne, T. 2011. Beliefs, attitudes, and propensity to buy locally produced food. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1:1929.Google Scholar
34 Cranfield, J., Henson, S., and Blandon, J. 2012. The effect of attitudinal and sociodemographic factors on the likelihood of buying locally produced food. Agribusiness: An International Journal 28:205221.Google Scholar
35 La Trobe, H. 2001. Farmers' markets: Consuming local rural produce. International Journal of Consumer Studies 25:181192.Google Scholar
36 McIlvaine-Newsad, H., Merrett, C.D., and McLaughlin, P. 2004. Direct from farm to table: Community supported agriculture in western Illinois. Culture and Agriculture 26:149163.Google Scholar
37 O'Hara, S. and Stagl, S. 2001. Global food markets and their local alternatives: A socio-ecological economic perspective. Population and Environment 22:533554.Google Scholar
38 Baker, S., Thompson, K.E., and Engelken, J. 2004. Mapping the values driving organic food choice: Germany vs the UK. European Journal of Marketing 38:9951012.Google Scholar
39 Makatouni, A. 2002. What motivates consumers to buy organic food in the UK? Results from a qualitative study. British Food Journal 104:345352.Google Scholar
40 Magnusson, M., Arvola, A., Hursti, U., Aberg, L., and Sjoden, P. 2003. Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 40:109117.Google Scholar