Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:43:45.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sorghum sudangrass as a summer cover and hay crop for organic fall cabbage production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Denise M. Finney ,
Nancy G. Creamer ,
Jonathan R. Schultheis ,
Michael G. Wagger  and
Cavell Brownie
Denise M. Finney*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Nancy G. Creamer
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Jonathan R. Schultheis
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7609, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Michael G. Wagger
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Box 7619, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Cavell Brownie
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Box 8203, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

No-tillage (NT) organic vegetable production presents several economic opportunities for growers in the southeastern United States while promoting natural resource conservation. This study was conducted to determine if removal of sorghum sudangrass (SS) cover crop biomass as hay, frequency at which the cover crop is mowed, and tillage affect weed suppression and head weight of transplanted organic cabbage. Sorghum sudangrass [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench×Sorgum sudanense (Piper) Staph.] was planted in May 2004 at Reidsville and Goldsboro, NC, preceding the planting of organic ‘Bravo’ cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. Capitata group) in August and September 2004, respectively. SS management systems included: low-frequency mowing with hay removed following the first mowing operation (LFM-H), low-frequency mowing with hay not removed (LFM), high-frequency mowing with hay not removed (HFM) and a no cover crop control. Two tillage treatments were applied within each management system: conventional tillage (CT) and NT. Under NT conditions, SS mulch generated by LFM offered broadleaf weed control in cabbage similar to that achieved under CT, regardless of whether cover crop biomass was removed as hay. Mowing with higher frequency reduced SS cover crop biomass by 18–33% and reduced weed suppression in NT cabbage. Mowing frequency did not influence the quantity of SS that re-grew in the cabbage crop. SS re-growth contributed to lower head weight in NT compared to CT cabbage in Goldsboro, and crop failure of NT cabbage in Reidsville. Cabbage head weight was highest when the crop was not preceded by SS in both CT and NT systems (1.6 as opposed to 1.3–1.4 kg head−1). Our findings suggest that the potential for growers to manage a cover crop also as a hay crop does exist; however, SS may not be a compatible cover crop species for organic fall cabbage production due to high amounts of re-growth.

Keywords

Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanenseBrassica oleraceano-tillageconservation tillageorganic vegetable productioncover croppingweed management
Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 225 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Uri, N.D. 2000. Perceptions on the use of no-till farming in production agriculture in the United States: an analysis of survey results. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 77(3):263–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Johnson, A.M. and Hoyt, G.D. 1999. Changes to the soil environment under conservation tillage. HortTechnology 9(3):380–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Abdul-Baki, A.A., Morse, R.D., Devine, T.E., and Teasdale, J.R. 1997. Broccoli production in forage soybean and foxtail millet cover crop mulches. HortScience 32(5):836–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Chellemi, D.O. 2006. Effect of urban plant debris and soil management practices on plant parasitic nematodes, Phytophthora blight and Pythium root rot of bell pepper. Crop Protection 25(10):1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Hoyt, G.D., Monks, D.W., and Monaco, T.J. 1994. Conservation tillage for vegetable production. HortTechnology 4(2):129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Organic Trade Association. 2006. The OTA 2006 Manufacturer Survey Overview. Organic Trade Association, Greenfield, MA.Google Scholar
7Hartwig, N.L. 1988. Crownvetch and min- or no-tillage crop production for soil erosion control. Abstracts of the Weed Science Society America 28:29.Google Scholar
8Hall, J.K., Hartwig, N.L., and Hoffman, L.D. 1984. Cyanazine losses in runoff from no-tillage corn in ‘living’ and dead mulches vs. unmulched conventional tillage. Journal of Environmental Quality 13:105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lal, R., Regnier, E., Eckert, D.J., Edwards, W.M., and Hammond, R. 1991. Expectations of cover crops for sustainable agriculture. In Hargrove, W.L. (ed.). Cover Crops for Clean Water. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 1–11.Google Scholar
10Hoyt, G.D. and Hargrove, W.L. 1986. Legume cover crops for improving crop and soil management in the Southern United States. HortScience 21:397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Ranells, N.N. and Wagger, M.G. 1997. Grass–legume bicultures as winter annual cover crops. Agronomy Journal 89(4):659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Creamer, N.G., Bennett, M.A., Stinner, B.R., and Cardina, J. 1996. A comparison of four processing tomato production systems differing in cover crop and chemical inputs. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 121:559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Weston, L.A. and Duke, S.O. 2003. Weed and crop allelopathy. Critical Reviews in Plant Science 22(3–4):367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hartwig, N.L. and Ammon, H.U. 2002. Cover crops and living mulches. Weed Science 50:688–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15McSorley, R., Dickson, D.W., de Brito, J.A., and Hochmuth, R.C. 1994. Tropical rotation crops influence nematode densities and vegetable yields. Journal of Nematology 26(5):308–314.Google ScholarPubMed
16Mojtahedi, H., Santo, G.S., and Ingham, R.E. 1993. Suppression of Meloidogyne chitwoodi with sudangrass cultivars as green manure. Journal of Nematology 25:303–311.Google ScholarPubMed
17Morse, R.D. 2000. High residue, no-till systems for the production of organic broccoli. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture, 19–21 June 2000, Monroe, Louisiana. p. 48–50.Google Scholar
18Creamer, N.G. and Baldwin, K.R. 2000. An evaluation of summer cover crops for use in vegetable production systems in North Carolina. HortScience 35(4):600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Weston, L.A., Harmon, R., and Mueller, S. 1989. Allelopathic potential of sorghum sudangrass hybrid (sudex). Journal of Chemical Ecology 15(6):1855–1865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Wolfe, D.W., Riggs, D., Abawi, G., van Es, H., Stivers-Young, L., and Pederson, L. 1998. Management Strategies for Improved Soil Quality with Emphasis on Soil Compaction. Department of Fruit and Vegetable Science Report No. 72. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
21Creamer, N.G. and Dabney, S. 2002. Killing cover crops mechanically: review of recent literature and assessment of new research. Journal of Alternative Agriculture 17(1):32–40.Google Scholar
22Chamblee, D.S., Green, J.T. Jr, and Burns, J.C. 1995. Principle forages of North Carolina: adaptation, characteristics, management, and utilization. In Chamblee, D.S. and Green, J.T. (eds). Production and Utilization of Pastures and Forages in North Carolina (NCARS Technical Bulletin 305). North Carolina State University (Department of Agricultural Communications), Raleigh, NC. p. 25–47.Google Scholar
23Wu, H., Pratley, J., Lemerle, D., and Haig, T. 2001. Allelopathy in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Annals of Applied Biology 139:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Monks, C.D., Monks, D.W., Basden, T., Selders, A., Poland, S., and Rayburn, E. 1997. Soil temperature, soil moisture, weed control, and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) response to mulching. Weed Technology 11(3):561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Drost, D.T. and Price, H.C. 1991. Effect of tillage system and planting date on the growth and yield of transplanted tomato. HortScience 26(12):1478–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS version 8, On-line Help. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
27Younger, M.S. 1998. SAS Companion for P.V. Rao's Statistical Methods in the Life Sciences. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, CA.Google Scholar
28Beuerlein, J.E., Fribourg, H.A., and Bell, F.F. 1968. Effects of environment and cutting on regrowth of a sorghum-sudangrass hybrid. Crop Science 8:152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Mohler, C.L. and Teasdale, J.R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Vicia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Research 33:487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30Finney, D.M. 2005. Evaluation of sorghum sudangrass as a summer cover crop and marketable hay crop for organic, no-till production of fall cabbage. MS thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
31Putnam, A.R., DeFrank, J., and Barnes, J.P. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. Journal of Chemical Ecology 9(8):1001–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Bottenberg, H., Masiunas, J., Eastman, C., and Eastburn, D. 1997. Yield and quality constraints of cabbage planted in rye mulch. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 14:323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Hoyt, G.D. and Walgenbach, J.F. 1995. Pest evaluation in sustainable cabbage production systems. HortScience 30(5):1046–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34Wolfe, D.W., Topoleski, D.T., Gundersheim, N.A., and Ingall, B.A. 1995. Growth and yield sensitivity of four vegetable crops to soil compaction. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 120(6):956–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35Vepraskas, M.J. 1988. Bulk density values diagnostic of restricted root growth in coarse-textured soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52(4):1117–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36Putnam, A.R. and DeFrank, J. 1983. Use of phytotoxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Protection 2(2):173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Geneve, R.L. and Weston, L.A. 1988. Growth reduction of eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis L.) seedlings caused by interaction with a sorghum–sudangrass hybrid (sudex). Journal of Environmental Horticulture 6(1):24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar