Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:14:57.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Profitability of abrasive weeding in organic grain and vegetable crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2018

Sam E. Wortman ,
Frank Forcella ,
David Lambe ,
Sharon A. Clay  and
Daniel Humburg
Sam E. Wortman*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, NE68583, USA
Frank Forcella
Affiliation:
North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 803 Iowa Avenue, Morris, MN56267, USA
David Lambe
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, Lincoln, NE68583, USA
Sharon A. Clay
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Horticulture, and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD57007, USA
Daniel Humburg
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD57007, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Sam E. Wortman, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed competition, especially within the crop row, limits the productivity and profitability of organic crop production. Abrasive weeding, a mechanical alternative to hand weeding, uses air-propelled grits to control small weed seedlings growing within the crop row. Recent research has demonstrated the successful use of abrasive weeding to reduce weed competition and increase yields in organic maize (Zea mays), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and green and red pepper crops (Capsicum annuum), but the profitability of this weed control tactic has not been assessed. Our objective was to determine the profitability of abrasive weeding using empirical yield data from three previously published studies, a range of crop prices and revenues, and a range of costs for wages, grit applicator ownership, tractor use, abrasive grits, and fuel. Results suggest that abrasive weeding was not profitable in organic maize production, and may reduce net income by US$223–3537 ha−1 compared with inter-row cultivation alone for weed control. The cost of abrasive weeding in maize was largely dependent on the cost of abrasive grits and the cost to own a four-row grit applicator (US$736–2105 yr−1). However, abrasive weeding was less expensive than hand weeding, especially as the scale of production increased. Abrasive weeding was profitable in tomato and pepper crops and increased net mean income by US$12,251–33,265 ha−1. However, abrasive weeding was not 100% effective and hand weeding for weed-free conditions was always the most profitable approach to in-row weed management in vegetable crops. The profit potential of the hand-weeded, weed-free treatments demonstrates the importance of weed control in high-value specialty crops–even those grown in plastic mulch film. Despite the profit potential for hand weeding observed here, labor is increasingly difficult to source, retain and afford, and abrasive weeding offers a mechanical alternative with 66% less labor required. Further research is needed to improve the efficacy of abrasive weeding and to reduce the cost of abrasive grits and application.

Keywords

Bio-based inputsfarm economicsmechanical weed controlorganic weed management
Type
Review Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 215 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, BP and Mohler, CL (2015) Weed management by upstate New York organic farmers: strategies, techniques and research priorities. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, 418–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, E (2017) Abrasive Grit Application for Integrated Weed and Nitrogen Management in Organic Vegetable Cropping Systems (M.S. Thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
Brown, B and Gallandt, ER (2019) To each their own: case studies of four successful, small-scale organic vegetable farmers with distinct weed management strategies. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34, 373–379.Google Scholar
Carlson, M (2018) Selected Agricultural Grits for Weed Control, Effect on Corn and Soybean Yield, Weed Growth, and Soil Mineralization (M.S. Thesis). South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD.Google Scholar
Carlson, M, Forcella, F, Wortman, SE and Clay, SA (2018) Using abrasive grit for weed management in field crops. In Physical Properties and Physical Methods for Stimulation of Plant Development (in press). InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. ISBN 978-953-51-5766-3.Google Scholar
Dartt, BA and Schwab, GD (2001) Crops and Livestock Budgets Estimates for Michigan. Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Economic Rep. 609.Google Scholar
Edwards, W (2015) Estimating Farm Machinery Costs: Ag Decision Maker. A3-29. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension.Google Scholar
Erazo-Barradas, M, Friedrichsen, CN, Forcella, F, Humburg, D and Clay, SA (2019) Propelled abrasive grit applications for weed management in transitional corn grain production. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34, 33–40.Google Scholar
Escalante, CL and Luo, T (2017) Sustaining a healthy farm labor force: issues for policy consideration. Choices (New York, N Y) 32, 1–9.Google Scholar
Fennimore, SA and Doohan, DJ (2008) The challenges of specialty crop weed control, future directions. Weed Technology 22, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennimore, SA, Smith, RF, Tourte, L, LeStrange, M and Rachuy, JS (2014) Evaluation and economics of a rotating cultivator in Bok Choy, Celery, Lettuce, and Radicchio. Weed Technology 28, 176–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F, James, T and Rahman, A (2011) Post-emergence weed control through abrasion with an approved organic fertilizer. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F, Humburg, D, Wortman, S and Clay, SA (2017) Air-propelled abrasive grit can damage the perennial weed, quackgrass. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 98, 963–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianessi, LP and Reigner, NP (2007) The value of herbicides in U.S. crop production. Weed Technology 21, 559–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granatstein, D, Andrews, P and Groff, A (2014) Productivity, economics, and fruit and soil quality of weed management systems in commercial organic orchards in Washington state, USA. Organic Agriculture 4, 197–207.Google Scholar
Jerkins, D and Ory, J (2016) National Organic Research Agenda. Santa Cruz, CA: Organic Farming Research Foundation, 126 p. http://ofrf.org/2016-national-organic-research-agenda-report Verified 27 July 2018.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K (2012) Comparison of production costs and resource use for organic and conventional production systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klonsky, K, Tourte, L and Chaney, D (1993) Production Practices and Sample Costs for Organic Processing Tomatoes in the Sacramento Valley. Davis, CA: University of California Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K, Tourte, L, Chaney, D, Livingston, P and Smith, R (1994) Cultural Practices and Sample Costs for Organic Vegetable Production on the Central Coast of California. University of California, Giannini Foundation Inf. Series No. 94-2, Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Melander, B (1998) Economic aspects of physical intra-Row weed control in seeded onions. In Foguelman, D and Lockeretz, W (eds), Proceedings of the 12th International IFOAM Scientific Conference. Mar del Plata, Argentina: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, pp. 180–185.Google Scholar
Nemming, A (1994) Costs of flame cultivation. Acta Horticulturae 372, 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Ruiz, M, Brenes, R, Urbano, JM, Slaughter, DC, Forcella, F and Rodríguez-Lizana, A (2018) Agricultural residues are efficient abrasive tools for weed control. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D, Hepperly, P, Hanson, J, Douds, D and Seidel, R (2005) Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 55, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, CG, Madsen, NA and Jacobsen, BH (2005) Organic farming scenarios: operational analysis and costs of implementing innovative technologies. Biosystems Engineering 91, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, CG, Nørremark, M, Jørgensen, RN, Jensen, K, Maagaard, J and Jensen, LA (2007) HortiBot: Feasibility study of a plant nursing robot performing weeding operations—part IV. 12. In. ASABE Annual International Meeting Papers. St. Joseph, MI American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Paper 077019.Google Scholar
University of Illinois FarmDoc (2018) Illinois Farm Management Handbook: Machinery Costs. http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/manage/index.asp Verified 19 April 2018.Google Scholar
University of Vermont Extension (2018) Vermont Vegetable and Berry Grower Pages. https://www.uvm.edu/vtvegandberry/?Page=marketlinks.html Verified 19 April 2018.Google Scholar
USDA Economic Research Service (2018) Organic Prices. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/organic-prices/ Verified 19 April 2018.Google Scholar
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (2018) Farm Labor Surveys. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Surveys/Guide_to_NASS_Surveys/Farm_Labor/ Verified 19 April 2018.Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018) Petroleum and Other Liquids: Weekly Retail Gasoline and Diesel Prices. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_gnd_dcus_nus_a.htm Verified 19 April 2018.Google Scholar
Wortman, SE (2014) Integrating weed and vegetable crop management with multifunctional air-propelled abrasive grits. Weed Technology 28, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortman, SE (2015) Air-propelled abrasive grits reduce weed abundance and increase yields in organic vegetable production. Crop Protection 77, 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortman, SE, Lindquist, JL, Haar, MJ and Francis, CA (2010) Increased weed diversity, density and above-ground biomass in long-term organic crop rotations. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar