Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:28:38.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives on organic transition from transitioning farmers and farmers who decided not to transition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2021

Garry Stephenson Open the ORCID record for Garry Stephenson [Opens in a new window] ,
Lauren Gwin ,
Chris Schreiner  and
Sarah Brown
Garry Stephenson*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Center for Small Farms & Community Food Systems, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
Lauren Gwin
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Center for Small Farms & Community Food Systems, Oregon State University, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
Chris Schreiner
Affiliation:
Oregon Tilth, Inc., Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Sarah Brown
Affiliation:
Oregon Tilth, Inc., Corvallis, Oregon, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Garry Stephenson, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite continuous growth in demand for organic food and farm products, US domestic supply is not keeping pace. Increasing domestic supply requires, in part, that more farms transition to certified organic production. This in turn requires a better understanding of the transition process. This paper reports on a national survey of farmers transitioning to organic certification through participation in the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Environmental Quality Incentives Program Organic Initiative (EQIP-OI). Our analysis focuses on what motivates farmers to undertake transition to organic certification and what obstacles they confront in the process. The survey population included farmers in the midst of the transition process and farmers who began transition but decided not to pursue organic farming, allowing us to compare both groups to farmers who successfully transitioned to certified organic. Because farmers do not control all of the factors that influence their success, we use a ‘spheres of influence’ framework to analyze obstacles at four levels: the farm, local and regional infrastructure, the marketplace and policy. Our results improve our understanding of the transition process and apply to a wide range of stakeholders and service providers who support farmers in different ways, through crop research, infrastructure development, market development and policy.

Keywords

Organic farmingorganic certificationorganic decertificationtransition to organic
Type
Research Article
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , December 2022 , pp. 633 - 643
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Best, H (2008) Organic agriculture and the conventionalization hypothesis: A case study from West Germany. Agriculture and Human Values 25, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S (2012) The USDA discrimination cases: Pigford, in Re Black Farmers, Keepseagle, Garcia, and Love. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 17, 3–35.Google Scholar
CoBank (2017) Surging demand for organic produce widens U.S. supply gap. News release 6/8/2017. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://www.cobank.com/-/media/files/news/2017/organicproducerelease.pdf.Google Scholar
Cranfield, J, Henson, S and Holliday, J (2010) The motives, benefits, and problems of conversion to organic production. Agriculture and Human Values 27, 291–306.Google Scholar
Darnhofer, I, Schneeberger, W and Freyer, B (2005) Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: farmer types and their rationale. Agriculture and Human Values 22, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiGiacomo, G and King, RP (2015) Making the transition to organic: ten farm profiles. Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program (SARE). Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/11299/181352.Google Scholar
Dillman, D and Smyth, J (2014) Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 4th Edn., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dimitri, C and Baron, H (2020) Private sector support of the farmer transition to certified organic production systems. Organic Agriculture 10, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitri, C and Oberholtzer, L (2009) Meeting market demand in the organic sector: handler–supplier relationships in the face of tight supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doorman, F (1991) A framework for the rapid appraisal of factors that influence the adoption and impact of new agricultural technology. Human Organization 50, 235–244.Google Scholar
Federal Register (2020) Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) for the Organic Certification Cost Share Program. Vol. 85, No. 154, Monday, August 10, 2020. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-10/pdf/2020-17385.pdf.Google Scholar
Greene, C (2013) Growth patterns in the U.S. organic industry. USDA Economic Research Service: Amber Waves. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2013/october/growth-patterns-in-the-us-organicindustry/.Google Scholar
Greene, C, Dimitri, C, Biing-Hwan, L, McBride, W, Oberholtzer, L and Smith, T (2009) Emerging issues in the U.S. organic industry. Economic Information Bulletin Number 55. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Home, R, Indermuehle, A, Tschanz, A, Ries, E and Stolze, M (2019) Factors in the decision by Swiss farmers to convert to organic farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakku, E and Thorburn, PJ (2010) A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems. Agricultural Systems 103, 675–682.Google Scholar
Jerkins, D and Ory, J (2016) 2016 National Organic Research Agenda. Santa Cruz, CA: Organic Farming Research Foundation. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at http://ofrf.org/sites/ofrf.org/files/staff/NORA_2016_final9_28.pdf.Google Scholar
Johnston, S (2010) Assessing farmer interest in transition to organic production and barriers to expansion of organic production in New York State. Report by New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at http://www.agriculture.ny.gov/ap/organic/docs/Abstract_Assessing_Farmer_Barriers.pdf.Google Scholar
Koesling, M, Loes, A, Flaten, O, Kristensen, NH and Hansen, MW (2012) Farmers' reasons for deregistering from organic farming. Organic Agriculture 2, 103–116.Google Scholar
Lau, M, Hanagriff, R, Constance, D, York, M, VanDelist, B and Higgins, LM (2010) Discerning differences among producer groups and organic adoption barriers in Texas. Journal of Food Distribution Research 40, 124–164.Google Scholar
Lloyd, D and Stephenson, G (2020) Oregon farmer perspectives on motivations and obstacles to transition to certified organic. Journal of Agriculture, Food System and Community Development 1, 101–115.Google Scholar
McBride, W and Greene, C (2015) Despite profit potential, organic field crop acreage remains low. USDA Economic Research Service: Amber Waves. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at http://www.ers.usda.gov/amberwaves/2015/november/despite-profit-potential-organic-field-crop-acreage-remains-low/.Google Scholar
National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition (2020) Presidential transition briefing papers: food & agriculture priorities for administrative action. Washington, D.C. National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. Viewed March 3, 2021. Available at https://sustainableagriculture.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NSAC-Final-Transition-Team-Document-2020-Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Organic Farming Research Foundation (2020 a) Research priorities for organic agriculture and climate change. Viewed March 3, 2021. Available at https://ofrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/RESEARCH-PRIORITIES-FOR-ORGANIC-AGRICULTURE-AND-CLIMATE-CHANGE-2020.pdf.Google Scholar
Organic Farming Research Foundation (2020 b) OFRF policy recommendations 2020. Viewed March 3, 2021. Available at https://ofrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/OFRF-Policy-Recommendations82020.pdf.Google Scholar
Organic Trade Association (2020) COVID-19 will shape organic industry in 2020 after banner year in 2019. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://ota.com/organic-market-overview/organic-industry-survey.Google Scholar
Reaves, E, Healy, C and Beach, JL (2019) US organic grain–how to keep it growing. Organic Trade Association, Sustainable Food Lab, and Farm Smart. February. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://ota.com/sites/default/files/indexed_files/US%20Organic%20Grain_How%20to%20Keep%20it%20Growing_Organic%20Trade%20Association.pdf.Google Scholar
Sahm, H, Sanders, J, Nieberg, H, Behrens, G, Kuhnert, H, Strohm, R and Hamm, U (2013) Reversion from organic to conventional agriculture: A review. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 28, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, G, Gwin, L, Garrett, A and Powell, M (2012) Enhancing organic agriculture in Oregon: research, education, and policy. OSU Extension Service, Special Report #EM9050. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/open_educational_resources/zw12z565t.Google Scholar
Stofferahn, CW (2009) Personal, farm and value orientations in conversion to organic farming. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 33, 862–884.Google Scholar
Strochlic, R and Sierra, L (2007) Conventional, Mixed and ‘Deregistered’ Organic Farmers: Entry Barriers and Reasons for Exiting Organic Production in California. Davis, CA: California Institute for Rural Studies.Google Scholar
Torres, A and Marshall, MI (2018) Identifying drivers of organic decertification: an analysis of fruit and vegetable farmers. HortScience 53, 504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA Farm Service Agency (2020) Organic Certification Cost Share Program. Fact sheet, August 2020. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/FactSheets/organic_certification_cost_share_program-fact_sheet.pdf.Google Scholar
USDA NASS (2020) Organic farming, results from the 2019 organic survey. ACH17-21. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Highlights/2020/census-organics.pdf.Google Scholar
USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) (n.d.) EQIP Organic Initiative. Viewed December 15, 2020. Available at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/programs/financial/eqip/?cid=nrcs143_008224.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Stephenson et al. supplementary material

Stephenson et al. supplementary material

Download Stephenson et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 83 KB