Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:29:08.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land use and soils disposal: From competition to territorial governance (examples from land use conflicts in the greater Paris region)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2013

André Torre  and
Ségolène Darly
André Torre*
Affiliation:
UMR SAD-APT, INRA—Agro Paristech, Paris—Saclay University.
Ségolène Darly
Affiliation:
UMR LADYSS, University Paris 8, and UMR SAD-APT, INRA.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rural, natural and peri-urban areas seem nowadays to become the object of conflicts and tensions because of their multi-functional nature. If these conflicts issue from opposing views about the use of land, they are also determined by the spatial parameters that characterize the pieces of land affected by the projects of land-use transformation, and by the antagonistic relationship between two or several units of action (farmers and local planners, for example). Therefore, there is a need for a new management of rural (and peri-urban) areas, and this is the role of territorial governance, which is the engine of local development, and the tool for better local compromises, involving periods of opposition and streams of negotiation. Territorial governance has to take into account not only negotiations but conflict relations as well and to include both interaction schemes into its framework. Our study assesses the role played by conflicts in land use within a peri-urban context, based on studies on the Greater Paris region, and a case study on the use of agricultural soils on the urban fringe.

Keywords

land useconflictsgovernanceurbanizationagricultural soils
Type
Themed Content: Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 29 , Issue 3: Special Section: Themed Content: Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems , September 2014 , pp. 206 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Röling, N. and de Jong, F. 1998. Learning: Shifting paradigms in education and extension studies. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 5(3):143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Marsden, T. 2006. Pathways in the sociology of rural knowledge. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T., and Mooney, P. (eds). The Handbook of Rural Studies. Sage Publications, London. p. 510.Google Scholar
3van der Ploeg, J.D., Renting, H., Brunori, G., Knicken, K., Mannion, J., Marsden, T., de Roest, K., Sevilla Guzman, E., and Ventura, F. 2000. Rural Development: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4):391–408.Google Scholar
4Darly, S. and Torre, A. 2013b. Land-use conflicts and the sharing of resources between urban and agricultural activities in the Greater Paris Region. Results based on information provided by the daily regional press. In de Noronha Vaz, T., Van Leeuwen, E., and Nijkamp, P. (dir.). Towns in a Rural World. Ashgate, London. p. 358.Google Scholar
5O'Lear, S., Diehl, P.F., Frazier, D.V., and Allee, T.L. 2005. Dimensions of territorial conflict and resolution: Tangible and intangible values of territory. GeoJournal 4(64):259–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wester-Herber, M. 2004. Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts-the role of place-identity in risk perception. Environmental Science & Policy 7(2):109–116.Google Scholar
7Joerin, F., Pelletier, M., Trudelle, C., and Villeneuve, P. 2005. Analyse spatiale des conflits urbains. Enjeux et contextes dans la région du Québec. Cahiers de Géographie du Québec 49(138):319–342.Google Scholar
8Ley, D. and Mercer, J. 1980. Locational conflict and the politics of Consumption. Economic Geography 56(2):89–109.Google Scholar
9Zérah, M.H. 2007. Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: The case of Sanjay Gandhi National Park in Mumbai. Cities 24(2):122–132.Google Scholar
10Solana-Solana, M. 2010. Rural gentrification in Catalonia, Spain: A case study of migration, social change and conflicts in the Empordanet area. Geoforum 41(3):508–517.Google Scholar
11Woods, M. 2003. Deconstructing rural protest: The emergence of a new social movement. Journal of Rural Studies 19:309–325.Google Scholar
12Halseth, G., Markey, S.P., and Bruce, D. (eds). 2010. The Next rural Economies: Constructing Rural Place in Global Economies. CABI, Wallingford, UK. p. 297.Google Scholar
13Campbell, S. 1996. Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association 62(3):296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Darly, S. and Torre, A. 2013. Conflicts over farmland uses and the dynamics of ‘agri-urban’ localities in the greater Paris region. Land Use Policy 33:90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Rucht, D. and Neidhardt, F. 1999. Methodological issues in collecting protest event data: Unit of analysis, sources and sampling, coding problems. In Rucht, D., Koopmans, R., and Neidhardt, F. (dir.). Acts of Dissent: New Developments in the Study of Protest. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham. p. 65–89.Google Scholar
16Torre, A., Melot, R., Magsi, H., Bossuet, L., Cadoret, A., Caron, A., Darly, S., Jeanneaux, P., Kirat, T., Pham, H.V., and Kolokouris, O. 2014. Evaluating and measuring conflictuality related to different and opposite land uses. Methods and identification. Springer Plus (forthcoming).Google Scholar
17Darly, S. 2012. Conflits d'usage et effets de reterritorialisation de l'agriculture. Economie Rurale 332:31–46.Google Scholar
18Pasquier, R., Simoulin, V., and Weisbein, J. (eds). 2007. La gouvernance territoriale. Pratiques, discours et théories. Droit et Société, 44, LGDJ, Paris.Google Scholar
19Kooiman, J. 2000. Societal governance: Levels, modes, and orders of social-political interaction. In Pierre, J. (ed.). Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
20Powell, W. 1991. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organisation. In Thompson, G., Frances, J., Levavcic, R., and Mitchell, J. (eds). Markets and Hierarchies and Networks: The Co-ordination of Social Life. Sage, London.Google Scholar
21Wettenhall, R. 2003. The rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Organization Review 3(1):77–107.Google Scholar
22Pierre, J. 2000 Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
23Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. 2001. Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanhamn, MD.Google Scholar
24Torre, A. and Traversac, J.B. (eds). 2011. Territorial Governance. Local Development, Rural Areas and Agrofood Systems. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg & New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Dowding, K., John, P., Mergoupis, T., and Van Vugt, M. 2000. Exit, voice and loyalty: Analytic and empirical developments. European Journal of Political Research 37:469–495.Google Scholar
26Torre, A., Aznar, O., Bonin, M., Caron, A., Chia, E., Galman, M., Guérin, M., Jeanneaux, Ph., Kirat, Th., Lefranc, Ch., Melot, R., Paoli, J.C., Salazar, M.I., and Thinon, P. 2006. Conflits et tensions autour des usages de l'espace dans les territoires ruraux et périurbains. Le cas de six zones géographiques françaises. Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine 3:415–453.Google Scholar
27Glazer, A. and Konrad, K.A. (eds). 2005. Conflict and Governance. Springer-Verlag, New York. p. 201.Google Scholar